Most people would concede that cloning and genetic enhancements are two notorious words that most would not consent with. In Mr. Kass’s article “Preventing Brave New World” commences on the astonishing achievements in bio-medical science and technology. Mr. Leon E. Kass agrees that people should be obliged for the breakthrough of advanced bio medical science and technology. Mr. Kass’s incredible work in bio-ethical science has placed this very well known philosopher in the white house with the Bush’s administration. Mr. Kass mentions in his article that we live in a world where transforming powers are already being applied in the 20th century, For example; In vitro fertilization, bottled embryos wombs, surrogate wombs, cloning, genetic screening,…
Imagine a world where there are clones who look exactly like a specific person. A world with many famous figures of the past, such as George Washington, Mother Teresa, and so many more. With cloning, that world may be possible, concluded “Cloning and the Human Family: Theology After Dolly” by Allen Verhey. A clone is a genetic copy of an individual. Scientifically, animals and other species can be cloned by “transferring DNA from a single cell of an animal into an egg cell and creating a relatively exact copy of that animal,” according to “Genetic Defects Found in Cloned Animals” by Steve Mitchell (Mitchell).…
On the other hand, there are quite a few cons that potentially outweigh the pros of cloning humans. The first con is that human cloning is unnatural. According to Lombardo, “many feel that interfering with the natural process of pro-creation would lead to other attributes of life being altered” or displaced from society. Many people are opposed to this issue due to their religious beliefs, because they feel man will be replacing the higher being as the creator of creatures on this Earth. In a scientific point of view, using an older cell to create a new organism could possibly cause an “imprinted age [to] be place on the growing embryo”, resulting in faster aging (“Pros and Cons of Human Cloning”). Lastly, because human cloning is a roughly…
Human Cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of an existing, or previously existing, human being or growing cloned tissue from that individual (Cloning Fact Sheet). Scientists remove the nucleus, which contains the genetic material, from an egg. The genetic material from an adult somatic cell is removed and placed in the egg. It now has a complete set of genes. The egg is placed in a petri dish to allow it to develop into an embryo, which is placed into a surrogate mother to continue to grow and develop into a baby (Genetic Science Learning Center). This technique is called nuclear transfer or nuclear transplantation because they transfer the nucleus from one cell to another (Kilner). Therapeutic cloning is a technique of human…
Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…
In the world of medicine, the use of reproductive technologies is similar to the story of, Frankenstein. Just like when Victor Frankenstein is able to gather old body parts together and be able to create a live human being is just like the idea behind how both doctors and parents have the complete control over the little details of the unborn child’s life. This would include things such as choosing the “correct” embryo to actually changing the cell inside the embryo to make sure that it will be in their eyes the perfect fit to their family. Within our society, the use of reproductive technology is a very controversial moral issue because of the idea of being in complete control of an unborn child’s life.…
The style Lewis Thomas uses is very unique. He writes in a very conversational tone, making it easier for readers to read and relate. He also adds in rhetorical questions as well as short simple sentences in his writing structure, and the entire passage seems to flow eloquently. Lewis Thomas has a distinct voice that is unique only to himself.…
The paper I chose to write a rebuttal on focuses on genetic cloning and its religious ethics. The basis of this article is that cloning a human being is wrong and scientists should know better to do so. The author argues, just because we can do something does not mean we should. Many people reference the bible as stating God created everything and if we clone living biological entities, then we are assuming the role of God and creating life. In this article, the author makes the point that God is the father of all life and life starts in the womb. That is the only way life should begin. Although this article starts out fairly, non-objective, that changes quite dramatically by the end of the article. I will be going over some of the key points of this article and identifying why I think this article is biased and based on feeling and not on fact. This article tends to focus more on the potential negative aspects of cloning and not the positive ones.…
Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of a human being. Cloning has recently become a possibility that seems much more realistic nowadays in society than a long time ago. Even though some people think that cloning should be allowed, I am not in agreement with this because of these three reasons: When people want to create a clone I believe they are trying to imitate God, it goes against ethics, and it also can cause health problems.…
Since 1885, cloning has been a hot topic in the science communities throughout the world. The first demonstration of artificial embryo twinning was performed by Hans Adolf Edward Dreisch using a sea urchin (National Human Genome Research Institute). In this simple experiment, Dreisch proved that shaking two-celled sea urchin embryos separated them and allowed each cell to grow into full sea urchins. What was learned by this experiment was that embryos in early stages of development have their own set of genes and can grow into full organisms, giving way for the principles of cloning used today. From then on, multiple scientific achievements have been reached, such as the artificial cloning of a salamander in 1902, the first successful nuclear…
If the modification is performed improperly the damage inflicted could prove to be irreversible. At one point when testing on animals it has been shown that “germline introduction of an improperly regulated normal gene resulted in pogency of the modified animal with no obvious effects on development, but enhanced tumor incidence during adult life” (Hall 162). Along with the fact that “although such methods may be undertaken to fabricate improved humans, in some cases, by accident or intent, the outcomes will be quasi-human or less than human” (Hall 164) people are hesitant to make this method of medicine wide spread. Another reason why people are worried about the mass populace utilizing this technology is due to the fact that some may consider it “a satanic act of disbelief and corruption that would change the nature with which God created human beings” (Sachedina 190). Other ethical concerns may include the “deep-seated fear of the further deterioration of social and familial values” (Sachedina 192) that could possibly occur through the overuse of cloning and genetic engineering technology. As a result of these factors concerned individuals have spoken out against the use of such technologies in favor of safer and more commonly accepted methods of curing the ill and providing crops for…
John A. Robertson, "Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation," The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 119-122.…
If we look at the best experience we have, identical twins, we find that twins share only 50% of personality characteristics and 70% of their intelligence, so we could safely assume clones would be nowhere near Zerox copies of the original.…
Since the dawn of civilization, mankind has been plagued by innumerable ethical quandaries. From the subjugation of those whose pigment doesn’t match our own to the creation of weapons of mass destruction, history has repeatedly shown us that as the human race progresses, there are always ethical dilemmas that make us question our every step. As our technological capabilities continue to grow at an exponential rate, these predicaments have continued to crop up alarmingly fast. Among the most recent ethical questions to plague our society is the one pertaining to human cloning. Supporters of this potential technological breakthrough cite it as one of the greatest achievement of the human race, while its detractors bemoan the ethics of…
There is a belief that many people share and that is that no one’s genes, be that of an unborn child, should be altered without his/her permission. It has been an unspoken truth that messing around with a person’s natural characteristics and way of being would end in a disastrous way that could affect our society. Since 1987, about 25 years ago, scientists have been stressing that very point. They stated that they would not interfere or alter the natural characteristics of a patient’s unborn child. But that all changed when in 1997 the first genetically engineered child was born. The means of how this child was born could shape the way our society thinks and, eventually, divide us. For these very reasons, Designer Babies should only be created…