Human Enhancement Technology Argumentative Essay
Argumentative essay
The world that human is living today is fulfilled with technology. The scope of such technological applications is not limited in one specific field. To be more specific,, technology can be used in the teaching area, agricultural development, aerospace engineering, medical science and service industry etc, which brings a substantial number of benefits. However, technology itself is a double-edged sword. When engaged in medical treatment and personal benefits, some people are skeptical about the practicability and feasibility of using technology to improve one’s mental or physical abilities. Some opponents might claim that people are born with given characteristics and it is morally unacceptable to change the intrinsic properties. …show more content…
Take brain chip as an example, many Americans, who are highly religious, are skeptical about the prospect of implanting a computer chip in the brains to improve the mental abilities to make them stronger and faster, since many believe that they are the Mark of the Beast, without which no one can buy or sell (de la Vega, 2005, p.62) and they will receive severe punishments from God if they choose to change their bodies. However, the problems generated by religion are insignificant and negligible compared to the huge benefits from human enhancement technology. In a addition, religious people overwhelmingly shift the focus point to the religious rules, which do not create any tangible harmful effects at all. The so-called punishments cannot be proved or confirmed by any existing researches or documents. Bennet (2016) argues in his article, if such technology exists that gives practical advantages, which is rejected by religious problems, it is a greater crime not to implement such technology than to operate it. Simultaneously, not every Christian or church opposes to this technology. According to Masci (2016) many mainline churches will support enhancement in a positive way as they will see aspects of it as attempts to improve human well-being and alleviate suffering. In short, religious problems are somehow exaggerated by the opponents of human enhancement technology, and the disputed problems are gradually being
The world that human is living today is fulfilled with technology. The scope of such technological applications is not limited in one specific field. To be more specific,, technology can be used in the teaching area, agricultural development, aerospace engineering, medical science and service industry etc, which brings a substantial number of benefits. However, technology itself is a double-edged sword. When engaged in medical treatment and personal benefits, some people are skeptical about the practicability and feasibility of using technology to improve one’s mental or physical abilities. Some opponents might claim that people are born with given characteristics and it is morally unacceptable to change the intrinsic properties. …show more content…
Take brain chip as an example, many Americans, who are highly religious, are skeptical about the prospect of implanting a computer chip in the brains to improve the mental abilities to make them stronger and faster, since many believe that they are the Mark of the Beast, without which no one can buy or sell (de la Vega, 2005, p.62) and they will receive severe punishments from God if they choose to change their bodies. However, the problems generated by religion are insignificant and negligible compared to the huge benefits from human enhancement technology. In a addition, religious people overwhelmingly shift the focus point to the religious rules, which do not create any tangible harmful effects at all. The so-called punishments cannot be proved or confirmed by any existing researches or documents. Bennet (2016) argues in his article, if such technology exists that gives practical advantages, which is rejected by religious problems, it is a greater crime not to implement such technology than to operate it. Simultaneously, not every Christian or church opposes to this technology. According to Masci (2016) many mainline churches will support enhancement in a positive way as they will see aspects of it as attempts to improve human well-being and alleviate suffering. In short, religious problems are somehow exaggerated by the opponents of human enhancement technology, and the disputed problems are gradually being