Preview

Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Nature
According to Plato’s ideas of Human Nature, man can not be without imperfections. Plato believes that man cannot live alone in human nature and due to this weakness man will naturally form social relationships that enhance his chances of surviving in nature. Plato goes onto say, with these social relationships must come social and political structure to control greed and envy, without social and political structure these can not be maintained. With all that being said Plato colors his views of government by saying it is inevitable. As long as man must form a social relationship to survive, he will eventually have to construct government to control social relations.
Aristotle’s famous saying “Man is a political animal” says a lot about his views of human nature. Like Plato, Aristotle believes the construction of government is inevitable. In human nature males are superior to females. Slavery is a natural part of life and slavery is helpful to society. A slave master must always be good to his slaves. Aristotle believes that family is a component of human nature. In human nature man needs he family to survive. “Man is a political animal” pants the color of how Aristotle views the nature of government. He believes that man will always form some type of government in the end.
St. Augustine was a Christian philosopher and he had a Dualistic Constructive Version on Human Life. Just like the book he wrote there was the City of God and the City of Man. St. Augustine was not worried about the City of man but the City of God. According to St. Augustine there was divine nature which was God the creator, Corporal Nature which was the body, and Spiritual Nature which is the soul. St. Augustine believed the soul is naturally peaceful and man has free will. St. Augustine also believed that human nature was believers vs. non- believers. I do not feel that St. Augustine paints a clear picture of how he views government but I do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sparta vs Athens Dbq

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it came to government the Spartan government was a very tough government it was an oligarchy and relied on farming and war. The Athenians government was an easier government being a democracy and relying on trading and focusing on arts and culture. In Sparta the government was an oligarchy an extremely tough government that was focused all around war. The Spartan government decisions were made by the kings and the elders. The Athenian government was a strong democracy run by the people. The philosopher Plato tried to reform the government and he wanted the government to get stronger for the people and was. In Doc. 5 it states how the more poor people there are that means the poor have more say in the government and this is what Plato strived for. In each document it shows the characteristics of each government in doc. 1 it explains how the elders and kings make the decisions and that is how it is an oligarchy. In Doc. 5 it explained how the people rule the government by how which class there in but it shows how the people have a say in the government unlike when a king and a select group of people run it.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed that the Democratic state degenerates into anarchy and that paves the way for the Tyrant to come in and rule over the weak. He believed this largely because he thought that in Democracy every man would arrange his own life to suit his pleasure, and if anything this seems like an early attack upon moral relativism because of the anger towards men just doing whatever they wished. He remarks that the life of a democrat is: “Subject to no order or restraint, and he has no wish to change an existence which he calls pleasant, free, and happy”. Plato thought that the insatiable desire for this good would lead to the neglect of everything else and would “transform” a democracy and make it lead to a demand for despotism. He foresaw that all of this would lead to citizens becoming so sensitive that they reject even the slightest application of control and would call it “tyranny” which would simply lead to a disregard of the Law. This would be total anarchy which would only lead to a Tyrant coming in and taking the power for himself, something that Plato utterly hated the thought of.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After reading St. Augustine's book it seemed to me that he had very little interest in politics as a whole, but he did seem to have a a great interest on the moral problems that plagued them. The books that make up this work come from one of his previous works entitled, The City of God, in which Augustine discusses many different aspects of the city. Augustine's view of Christianity in regard to politics was due to the moral decline of the Roman Empire and the effect of this decline on the still faithful Christians. Augustine blamed the pagan gods and their lack of concern for the moral character which defined those who worshiped them. He also makes a reference to Plato's Republic, in regards to the way Plato wanted to banish the poets from his city in speech. Augustine also felt that there should be strong censorship of the poets when writing about the gods because they made fools out of them. Augustine is also very concerned with the amount of people who in past invasions of their homelands escaped by lying about being Christians and then turned their backs on Christ when the danger had…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Natures Tragic Flaw

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you believe there is a beast within man that tempts us to do wrong and commit sin? Or is it just human nature to be sinful? In the bible, book of Genesis, it shows how God created Adam and Eve. These two beings had everything one could possibly imagine, food, water, shelter, and the protection of our heavenly father. Their only rule in The Garden Of Eden was to not eat from the forbidden fruit tree in the center of the garden, but Adam and Eve were flawed and soon fell into temptation from the serpent, and ate the fruit. They went against God’s only command and made the human species sinners. In the novel, The Lord Of The Flies, a plane crashes on an uninhabited island leaving numerous boys stranded. These boys had to learn to survive without adults to make their food and provide shelter for them. At first they all agree to a chief, Ralph, and are willing to work together to build shelters, but as the novel reaches its climax, they turn savage which soon leads to the death of three boys. The author “William Golding” portrays that it is not human nature within ourselves that makes us act out, but when times are rough, violence and sin leads us away from the path of righteousness.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato States Decline Essay

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How and why, according to Plato, do States decline. “…since all creates things must decay, even a social order of this kind cannot last for all time, but will decay.” (546a) Socrates recognises that his “ideal state” is unlikely to occur in the first place, but if it did exist, it will not last. Plato breaks down the decay into five regimes, decaying in order of best to worst, with each regime occupied by a type of man. Fundamentally, the decline occurs due to the polis not recognising their proper role and overstepping their specific set of duties.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He openly believes that the state should strongly enforce moral paternalism upon its people. Plato believed that individuals were incapable of achieving personal happiness on their own. As a result, they were not able to comprehend what was good or bad for them. Consequently, they needed the guidance and direction from their leaders in order to attain personal satisfaction. Plato worried that without the influence of paternalism, the overall morality of a nation would suffer; the righteous nature of a nation’s populace could fall victim to corruption.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In short, Plato’s government reinforces the need for order while giving the illusion of freedom. Whereas Machiavelli proposes that government’s primary concern is to remain intact, thereby preserving stability for the people who live under it.Plato main focus is way of life for people.But for Machiavelli country protection and people protection is most important him.So he make sure that they are ready for any kind attack on them.Plato is not favor of cruilty he beileve cruitly makes things more worse.But Machiavelli think cruilty is required so that people remain in their limits.If there is not cruilty people are the most evil on earth so he beileve there should be some cruilty.Plato would establish only one specific class to be the armed protectors of the State, but Machiavelli would create a fighting force where anyone who seems qualified to handle a weapon could do so Machiavelli's assertion that the people should generally be left alone so as to facilitate the ruler's continued support from the people. Plato believes that a government needs to directly interfere with people so as to make their lives more virtuous. Machiavelli think a ruler is concerned with nothing but his maintenance of power. But Plato's ruler is virtuous and cares for his people, not his own…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature

    • 1288 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Aztecs were a Native American tribe who came to be in 1300. They lived in the…

    • 1288 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Thomas Paine, “society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil.”…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, one of the many well-known philosophers in history, is Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), who believed in more of a natural institution. Aristotle was heavily influenced by Plato, but disagreed with some aspects of his philosophy. However, Aristotle agreed with Plato’s theory, in which humans are political animals, but what sets humans different from animals, is that humans can reason. Hence, this forces people to live according to their reason rather than their passions. The downside of this ideology, is that the thoughts on a particular topic one would have, would be significantly different from other people, thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result, if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act, society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals, resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on, Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    St. Augustine And Judaism

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Augustine's contribution to political believed was that man's transgression nature inclines him to do detestable and that just through dedication to God can man would like to have triumph over his base nature. Since just a few individuals are called to an existence of atonement and salvation, the political procedure must discover shared conviction whereupon the spared and unsaved may commonly exist together. Augustine discovered this shared view in the connection of common peace. He contemplated that both Christians and non-Christians want peace in light of the fact that, without it, neither could accomplish their craved closures. At the end of the day, social request serves the self-hobbies of both gatherings and along these lines is the point of common government. Government power comes specifically from God and, in Augustine's perspective, it makes a difference not whether that legislature is "great" or "bad" since compliance is required of all. Undoubtedly, his wish is that all administration would be in the hands of Christians, yet he recognizes that such is not the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The natural way of how one acts, feels and thinks refers to ones human nature. “Nature” refers to something us as humans have acquired naturally. We’re going to be focusing on if humans are born good or evil by human nature. Good, meaning morally right and evil meaning morally wrong or bad.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Among the thinkers we have studied in class, we can divide their views on political justice into two major categories: those who believe justice is what the ruler says it is, and those who believe justice is part of a higher “moral code” independent of the ruler. Thrasymachus and Hobbes believe that the powerful dictate law and order. On the other hand, Aristotle, Polemarchus, Socrates, and Plato believe that justice cannot be influenced by those of the ruler. I believe the best account of political justice is a combination of a few thinkers including those of Thrasymachus, Aristotle, and Plato. This account would borrow Thrasymachus’s idea that those who have power dictate justice; Aristotle’s idea that the well-being of the community would be better than the prosperity of the individual; Plato’s idea that justice is merely an instrumental value.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays