Axe body spray and perfumes for men is known to be one of the most sexist and misogynistic companies around. Their commercials depict women as sexual objects, to be rounded up by perfume and used for the wearers desire. Antithetical to that, Dove is known for it’s Real Beauty campaign. Empowering women to be proud of who they are and what they look like, Dove makes great efforts in the self-respect movement. Something that is little known to the general population is that these two brands are owned by the same big corporation: Unilever.
This is an example of how people take advantage of other peoples values and circumstances. All they want is money. Large corporations don’t care if you get the girl or if you feel beautiful, they are just trying to make as much money as possible. It is evident that they take advantage of young peoples desires to feel wanted, and many peoples desires to feel comfortable in their own skin for their own benefits, no matter the contradiction in values.
Cancer is something everyone will experience in their lives. At some point in any given life, someone will encounter cancer in themselves or a loved one. In New Zealand, an organisation called Project Promise was raising funds to build a cancer research hospital. They were $383,000 short of what they needed, and time was running out. When the members of the organisations were beginning to lose hope, someone donated one million dollars. They set out to find who it was, but the donor wanted to remain anonymous.
This was selflessness as best we know it. The concept of altruism is one under debate on it’s own; but the idea of altruism in a broad sense is displayed here. Whoever donated this money was not out for a material return or accolades from their peers. Perhaps this amount was much to give, perhaps not; either way, it was needed and someone gave it. The anonymity let the donor do something good without receiving material or social benefits, showing that selflessness is possible.
Hurricane Sandy happened last year and caused devastation for the residents along the Jersey shore. So many people were left homeless and there weren’t many police officers or law enforcement agents around to keep control of the situation. Many people were considered heroes in this situation; giving up their time and resources to help those who lost everything. There are still people helping those who became homeless, and some still who are giving more of their time and efforts to set up programs for the mentally ill to cater to their specific needs. However, there have also been looters. People who took whatever they could find from wherever they could find it. There are construction companies who are taking advantage of desperate families and committing fraud. They are scamming people who already have nothing to take even that away. With no restraints, people do anything, whether good or bad.
Religious institutions are more and more in the news with both good and bad happenings within. Religious institutions have been called out for the wrongdoings they have condoned, and praised for the good things they have condoned.
The new Pope has made a big step in telling catholics around the world to stop hate and move on from certain issues that have lead to exclusion of certain groups from the church. By telling the world of catholics that they “cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods”, he opened a window for people to get over these things and accept people for who they are.
Stephen Weinberg said that “with or without [religion] you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.” Religion gives people reasons to do atrocious things. If one believes their god tells you to do something under threat of eternal torture, one will do anything. Honour killings, terrorism, hate speech, telling people in AIDS-ridden countries not to use condoms, and systematically moving rapist priests to different churches instead of prosecuting them are all things done in the name of god. Most people would agree that these things are not good things.
Government does nothing to control human nature but create the laws to which citizens must abide by. By looking around the world at various governments, it is evident that people will act how they naturally are independent of government. Government only tries to regulate a forced goodness in people. In Syria, China, Egypt, Ireland, Germany, and Canada- all around the world and in all forms of government- people do great and terrible things.
However, contrary to that is the example of the country of North Korea. In North Korea it is completely illegal to have differing opinions to the one that the government has. If it is found that someone has different ideas of how things should be, their family, including them, is thrown into concentration camps. In this case, the government is being completely controlling of everything everyone does, thinks, and feels in reaction to anything.
There are people in this world who do the right things, people who do the wrong things, and some are indifferent. It is illogical and unfair to generalise seven billion people and counting into one fixed human nature. People make choices every day, and those choices are based on both what one knows and what one doesn’t know; the choices made by an individual may vary depending on what their circumstances are. Other peoples choices can change what may have happened.
Ilyas Kassam said that “an over examination of life can deter you from life itself.” There are times when it is helpful and important to examine one's life and think about what it means to be human. The conclusion I have drawn about our nature is that we don’t have a nature. To find out whether someone is a kind or evil person it is necessary to learn about them, to know their circumstances, and to try and understand why they make the choices they do. There will always be evil people, but the one thing to keep hope for is the fact that there will always be good people too.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In document 1, the anti-sophist teacher and philosopher, Socrates, suggests that "The unexamined life is not worth living". This quote can be interpreted by saying that it is good to examine your life, or think over it with great caution, and not make mistakes. He recommends that it is good to discover yourself, know what you…
- 304 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
we are taking, and the decisions we are making. I like how Socrates puts it “An unexamined life is life not…
- 818 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Let's look at an example of Confucius who is most famous for self-reflection. He always said that when he was talking about adults, he emphasized reflection of own-self. Confucius regarded the reflection obtained through people and people so much as to have an anthropological relation of Confucius. That is to say that it grows through self-reflection like the saying of Socrates. For one thing, for example, I have deeply learned the word “self-reflection” when taking a course about relationships. I had the time to learn intensively the word "self-reflection" in some way, learning what is important. Growing up and development what everybody feels what is difficult words but, If you have time to reflect on yourself, not in this sense, you can learn what is wrong with me and how to fix it. After I analyzing, I can understand what Socrates wants to say through “unexamined life is no life”. As my experience, when I was young, my mother always treated me after I made mistakes, she gave me time alone in a room. She only said to me “think yourself what is wrong with your acting and behaviors”. This is really common treatment in my hometown when someone’s kids have mistakes. Giving time for thinking yourself. That is self-reflection. I totally agree “unexamined life is no life” what Socrates said at trial If this saying’s meaning is right same as what I thought. Not in difficult terms such as development, growing up, just we are able to think yourself by oneself without any helping what is right or not. I think that is all of the human…
- 1143 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Egoism is the act of behaving self-interestedly, and is perceived as a negative trait even though it can be seen as a tool of survival (Rosenstand, 2003: 131). However, there is an opposing theory, which is altruism. Altruism is defined as a concern for the welfare of others and is considered virtuous (Rosenstand, 2003: 150). We are often made aware of heroes who risk their lives for others and these heroes inspire many. We are encouraged to be altruistic, early in our lives. Nonetheless, one notices how altruist acts usually include rewards, even if it’s just a simple thank you. This leads to questions such as, does true altruism exist, or do people always have a motive as to why they perform altruistically?…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
So though I do enjoy helping others, is it truly to help them, or my own ego, mindset, conscience? In the third chapter entitled ‘Unbelievable Stories about Apathy and Altruism,’ the first story is about a woman brutally murdered by her apartment and no one around; none of the numerous witnesses did anything to help this woman, or to stop what was going on. This sickens me. If one was to even help out in this situation, I wouldn’t even consider it altruistic; I’d consider it a moral duty. Unfortunately, I do not believe in anyone being simply altruistic, as much as I want to, and it’s sad. Humans are selfish animals. In this chapter, the authors write about an experiment done in a lab to see if altruism actually did exist by playing a game with money (a person was given a certain amount of money in which they had to split with somebody else). The average amount of money given away was twenty percent of their own, and although the scientists believe this to be an example of altruism, I have to disagree. I believe the people did that since it wasn’t their own money to spend in the first place—they hadn’t earned the money themselves, they were just receiving it, so why not give some away? Also, it would make themselves feel a little bit better; getting free money, it’s only fair to share some, correct? Their conscience came into…
- 1813 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Altruism-Altruism is described as the “unselfish attention to the needs of others. It has also been defined as “sacrifice as a benefit for others” (Haigh, 2010).…
- 755 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Altruism is the opposite of egoism. Individuals who perform helpful acts for others do so purely for genuine concern and/or to increase the welfare of others (Fiske, 2012, pg. 347). People who perform altruism acts feel empathy, concern, and/or sympathy for another. People who act in an altruistic way see the world as benevolent (Fiske, 2012, pg. 347).…
- 767 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article, The Unexamined Life is Not Worth Living, School Papers explains, “ If a person does not examine his life, he may keep making the same mistakes and never change...The Apostle Peter says that while waiting for the return of Christ, one should “make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with Him… Despite the fact that a man with an unexamined life should still continue to exist, he will not achieve the fulfillment that an examined life will.” Therefore, a person who does not question life and the essence of it isn’t really living accordingly. It is sensible to examine our behaviors and actions, and learn from…
- 1030 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Young dark skinned women found it to be racist due to the ‘before and after’ words. The advert shows a timeline starting from the left with an African American, Latina women in the middle and white woman at the end to the far right. This suggests that getting more visibly beautiful skin means having lighter and whiter skin. Furthermore, not only is it the colour of skin which is found to be an issue but also the models size. The model underneath the word ‘after’ is white, skinny and blonde. The ideology message sent to the audience is that women need to have a particular look, in order to be beautiful. Dove may have not designed the ad in this manner on purpose, but the general public do.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Another example, this author has witnessed was after Hurricane Katrina. Many came to the Gulf Coast to help, which this author believes was probably a combination of both altruism and egotistic. The end goal was to increase the welfare of those who had lose so much. To this author this is true altruism.…
- 794 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
to be easy, everyone would go through the days knowing the answers to their lives. Nothing would be an unexpected surprise to people, but that is not the case. Instead, we attempt to plan out every day and learn to expect the unexpected. A person can try to plan the best future for him or herself, but when it comes down to it, it is ultimately not in his or her hands. Whether a person is rich or poor, beautiful or hideous, popular or lonely, powerful or shy, that is who he or she is and he or she is wonderful. Life is worth living no matter which “category” one falls under. But is that all there is to it? Is life just simply one’s ego? People spend their entire life trying to get on the right track to life, but what about when that is all taken away. Questioning the value of a person’s life when he or she is living versus when he or she…
- 2256 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Aztecs were a Native American tribe who came to be in 1300. They lived in the…
- 1288 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The natural way of how one acts, feels and thinks refers to ones human nature. “Nature” refers to something us as humans have acquired naturally. We’re going to be focusing on if humans are born good or evil by human nature. Good, meaning morally right and evil meaning morally wrong or bad.…
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Humans are the only species that fight and kill among themselves and cause other species to go extinct. Is the state of nature of humans naturally good or bad? This question has been asked in the psychological world many times. Here is my answer: although we humans have a tendency to believe that people are normally good, people are born to be bad. Because people can not have a peaceful condition of living without authority, are not trustworthy of the public, and prioritize their needs over others’ needs (self interest).…
- 973 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When you are posed with the question if human beings are inherently good or bad, you often find yourself floundered to find an answer. It is a fundamental question with no definite answer, only your conception of situations and human beings. People often look for the bad in the world, they point out the negative things instead of the positive because that’s what people want to hear about. The positive things are overlooked, which concludes with people believing that humans are inherently bad. Unfortunately, they do not recognize the many positive actions of others. Humans, when born, naturally crave love and affection. They are born without greed or desire. Mankind is inherently good, as demonstrated in the novel Night written by Elie Wiesel…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays