or asking “why do you do what you do?” To the point, it is absolutely important to consider the impact of a group has o the behavior of others in the same society for they will impact the community to join in the actions. And usually it’s far better to act as a large collective group then tackling an issue alone.
2) Throughout the course distinctions have been made as to the difference between human smuggling versus human trafficking. Present how each of these are commonly defined by government and NRO’s. Then, critically examine these definitions as to whether they are really different or whether they are all part of the same transnational crime phenomenon. What implications does this have for its prevention and responses by nation states? Provide referenced and convincing support for your position.
Government Definitions:
Human trafficking falls along the lines of criminal activity where business is done to exchange human beings for cash transactions. Trafficking enterprises seek profit from exploitation of the victims. Human trafficking allows for the use of fraud, force or coercion. The government defines human trafficking as sexual or commercial sex acts which involve force and fraud of individuals under the age of 18. Also the government add the section where transporting, provision or obtaining of a person for labor or certain services by the use of force and fraud for the purpose of slavery labor. Human smuggling I defined as facilitation, transportation and attempted transportation illegally across international borders, violating country laws. Majority of smugglers use false documents to transport individuals into a country for a fee (US Department of States, 2006). NGO’s Definitions:
Human trafficking is defined as a modern day slavery where victims are used for forced labor or sexual exploitation.
NGO’s follow the UN Law which defines human trafficking similar the US state department (Florida NOW Trafficking, 2016).
Human Smuggling is also defined similar to that the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organized Crime which states, “ the procurement, in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit, of the illegal entry of a person into a State of which the person is not a national or a permanent resident”(UNCTOC).
Differences between the 2:
Illegal smuggling requires illegal crossing of borders of another country. Where human trafficking is a crime against a person and involves commercial sex acts or labor services induced by force ad fraud. Certain differences between human trafficking and human smuggling is consent exploitation and transnationality. In regards to consent smugglers agree to move people from one country to another illegally for a fee. Majority of trafficked victims, have no say in what they do or where they are taken. They are misled or forced to have been deceived into agreeing by false promises, only to then face exploitation. And of course there is the notion of smuggling which happens to have and end destination whereas trafficking doesn’t. On the opposite side, traffickers exploit their victim throughout the entire journey and at each stop domestically and/or internationally. …show more content…
Whereas smuggling always involves crossing international borders and trafficking happens regardless of whether victims are taken to another country or moved within a country’s borders.
Then, critically examine these definitions as to whether they are really different or whether they are all part of the same transnational crime phenomenon.
These definitions are similar the only main difference is one looks from government perspective and the other mixes government with a more subtle approach considering the individuals customs and beliefs. The main issue is that various agencies monitor the same issue, human trafficking. It’s high difficult to monitor the trafficking when there are so many agencies rushing to do the same. Niam stated, how “fighting these criminal networks with highly centralized, nation nation-based bureaucracies and the frictions and problems they face manifest in the fact that they are merely states (Niam).”
What implications does this have for its prevention and responses by nation states? Provide referenced and convincing support for your position.
The topic of human trafficking and smuggling will continue to be a popular discussion among political circles and the international community.
There is and continues to strike up response to improve political efforts to end the problem. Illegal entry and smuggling of individuals but there is the issue that those who are trafficked or smuggled defend their choice to work in this servitude or smuggled across borders. The issue is goes back to the asymmetric theory introduced by Niam, the issue where criminal organizations are steps ahead of the government (Niam). These smuggling rings have advantages over governments since there isn’t an international collective monitoring agency within certain areas to monitor and prohibit these illegal activities and prosecute these offenders. These illegal organization relying of the struggles of these weak individuals to make a profit, they use the gaps in the system and the fragmented legal systems of a society to their advantage. It’s also an advantage for these illegal organizations to supply a basic service of cheap labor for companies or organizations in other countries who seek these low paid individuals to employ. The dependence these migrants/trafficked victims along with ignorance is what fuels this operations. The issue of border controlling has risen and along with it the human rights f these illegal individuals entering to country. The treatment and the initial actions taken to stop these individual from coming in have been
scrutinized, for example, Mexico and United States border. So the methods are called into question by organizations fighting for human rights (Migrant Smuggling And Trafficking)