Humanities of Hamlet
The Humanities, Vocationalism and the Public Good: Exploring ‘the Hamlet Factor’
Laurence Wright
The humanities, like most academic disciplines, face questions of popular and public perception. The sciences, for instance, increasingly attract challenges, sometimes of dubious validity, from passionate advocates of so-called ‘deep ecology’ outside the academy, and from postmodern science studies within it. Educationists worldwide face growing discontent with the quality and character of public education. Anthropologists fend off endemic charges of political incorrectness while struggling with the possible demise of their discipline. The fine arts have become inured to occasional ugly public confrontations and persistent bland dismissal by majority opinion. The humanities, it seems, are not alone in feeling the need to clarify their relations with the public. Some of the needed elucidation is trivial, but deserving of wide public dissemination, debate and consideration: for instance, the vocational contribution of the humanities is often misunderstood. Other matters are more fundamental. They have to do with understanding the value of the humanities in relation to the cultural formation of human beings. In South Africa the humanities stand in particular need of winning broader public acceptance and support because they are repositioning themselves in what is in significant respects a new country. Internal scrutiny and revision need to be accompanied by renewal of public understanding, both with regard to potential recruits to the disciplines (students and their parents, for instance) and in terms of the value placed on the humanities by employers and decision-makers in society. Vocationalism Let us begin with the trivial. It is often said that the university is the natural home of those who seek answers to the big questions. Well, here are some big questions: The science graduate asks, ‘Why does it work?’ The graduate in accounting asks, ‘How much will it cost?’ The
Laurence Wright
The humanities, like most academic disciplines, face questions of popular and public perception. The sciences, for instance, increasingly attract challenges, sometimes of dubious validity, from passionate advocates of so-called ‘deep ecology’ outside the academy, and from postmodern science studies within it. Educationists worldwide face growing discontent with the quality and character of public education. Anthropologists fend off endemic charges of political incorrectness while struggling with the possible demise of their discipline. The fine arts have become inured to occasional ugly public confrontations and persistent bland dismissal by majority opinion. The humanities, it seems, are not alone in feeling the need to clarify their relations with the public. Some of the needed elucidation is trivial, but deserving of wide public dissemination, debate and consideration: for instance, the vocational contribution of the humanities is often misunderstood. Other matters are more fundamental. They have to do with understanding the value of the humanities in relation to the cultural formation of human beings. In South Africa the humanities stand in particular need of winning broader public acceptance and support because they are repositioning themselves in what is in significant respects a new country. Internal scrutiny and revision need to be accompanied by renewal of public understanding, both with regard to potential recruits to the disciplines (students and their parents, for instance) and in terms of the value placed on the humanities by employers and decision-makers in society. Vocationalism Let us begin with the trivial. It is often said that the university is the natural home of those who seek answers to the big questions. Well, here are some big questions: The science graduate asks, ‘Why does it work?’ The graduate in accounting asks, ‘How much will it cost?’ The
Cited: Africa Institute. 1996. Africa at a Glance: Facts and Figures, 1995/96. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa. Allen, Robert C. 1999. Education and Technological Revolution: The Role of the Social Sciences and the Humanities in the Knowledge-based Economy. Ottawa: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. ---------------------. 1998. The Employability of Graduates in Humanities, Social Sciences and Education: Recent Statistical Evidence. Ottawa: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Aristophanes. 1984. The Clouds. Ed. Alan H. Sommerstein. Warminster: Aris & Phillips. Bronowski, Jacob. 1964. Science and Human Values. 1956. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Halliday, M.A.K. 2001. Day Trip Boy Car Theft Fury: On the Complementarity of System and Text. Guest lecture, University of Liverpool, June. (Transcribed by Diana Kilpert from a recording supplied by Geoffrey Thompson.) ‘Hi-tech CEOs say value of liberal arts is increasing.’ http://www.trainyourbrain.ca/english/tools/ceo.html Downloaded from the World Wide Web: 25 March, 2006. Howie, Sarah. 2001. Mathematics and Science Performance in Grade 8 in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council. Mills, C.Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 1997. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. London: Harvard University Press. Oakeshott, Michael. 1967. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. 1962. London and New York: Methuen. Plato. c1997. Apology of Socrates. Ed Michael C. Stokes. Warminster: Aris & Phillips. -------. 1994. Republic. Trans. Robin Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Popper, Karl. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 1945. 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Shakespeare. 1987. Hamlet. Ed. G.R. Hibbard. c1602. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. *‘Statement by 15 University Vice-Chancellors from the Province of Ontario, Canada.’+ http://www.trainyourbrain.ca/english/supporters/chancellors.html Downloaded from the World Wide Web: 25 March, 2006. South African Government. Ministry of Education. 1997. White Paper on Higher Education. http://www.polity.org.za/html/govdocs/white_papers/educwp3.html?rebookmar k=1#PURPOSES Downloaded from the World Wide Web: 10 April 2006. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell. Wolpert, Lewis. 1993. The Unnatural Nature of Science. London, New York: Faber and Faber.