Since I learn to understand the world I always believe in two saying that, “everything happens for a reason’ and “never compunction the past because it made you who you are today”. I have felt that these statements have always been supportive and positive in my life. After studying determinism, these statements seem to epitomize the theory of cause and effects. Determinism is the doctrine that all events, including human choice and decisions, are necessarily determined by motives, which are regarded as external forces acting on the will. The opposing theory is libertarianism and is an older encouragement than its rival. Libertarians view that at least some human actions are free and depending on the situations people can exercise their free will.
William James an American philosopher and psychologist, defends a moderately reasonable style of libertarianism. He has faith in free will and entitlements we are free whenever we have a genuine choice. I find Mr. James analysis of determinism in Melanie Chaparian’s, “Am I free or determined?” to be substantial in the sense that libertarianism must be contemporary in the human condition but I found his theory a lot more flexible than the declarations by determinism. Libertarianism is more complex because it looks into the human thought process than a simple excuse such as, there is no free will because everything is pre-determined, which takes away any responsibility human should have for their activities. Libertarianism includes the principle of free will, therefore stating that we always have the power to choose our actions, regardless of the situations. Free will is the opposite of determined; this is the key hurdle among Libertarianism and Determinism. In James defense of free will, he argues that we can choose between possible actions and in order to prove that we chose our own action to prove that we have free will and we do what we feel that is right or wrong. People may choose any of the possible actions that will not include pre-determined. After making the decision we may perform action that will include the free will. He also claims that substantial evidences of human life must sufficiently be clarified in any balanced theory of human behavior. Determinism does not prove the feelings of freedom of regret that the human race experiences. Determinists believe the feeling of freedom is illusion and we have no control over our actions and decisions are already made for us and we have to obey them. Libertarianism conforms that we have the freedom of our free will. We make the choice and then make our own decision to follow in order to get success.
In conclusion, Personal experience is often referred to when studying libertarianism. This is why I find it to be the most balanced theory and more in depth and complex then determinism, which is quick to assume and passive towards human feelings. In relation to the statements I first mentioned, theorists such as Friedrich Nietzsche with his “will to power” ideology and William James’ moderate take on Libertarianism, along with the study of Determinism vs. Free Will, has changed my perspective on past choices and what, if anything actually happens for a specific reason. When I think of my statement now that I have feeling that I do have some freedom in my path of life to make decisions and the some of the decision I made in my past.
The large ant
In “The Large Ant” by Howard fast, Mr. Morgan kills the large ant because he is human. It is human nature to look at something out of the standard critically and bee scared of it. In the face of taking highly developing brainpower and high dimensions for reason, when the primal existence constitution is susceptible, the human default setting is to respond with violence without thinking. The ignorant and naturally violent wildlife of humanity will catch up with us and this will be the fate of humankind. We are inevitably doomed with the curse of fear and this is quite apparent in Mr. Morgan’s character in “The Large Ant”.
Every single human being has separate personalities that set them apart from other humans. If we look at the characteristics of human abroad, we think, feel, and act in the same nature in distinctive situations. If human feels the frightened enough that they feel threatened they just over react and they will kills what made them got scared. Mr. Morgan is normal, intelligent and not savage man, he still reacts that way. He thought that he was in danger even though he was not in danger, yet he still reacts as any human would do. That is related to the theory of B.F.Skinner. It’s all about how human behave on the situation and the outcome from that reaction. Human are often unaware why they react the way they do. They might be able to realize that is human nature, but still not to be able to grasp the concept of why. If we look back in the event he says “it was just their” and he kills it. Mr. Morgan cannot explain why he killed it. That shows the existential theory of Friedrich Nietzsche.
Therefore, humanity is fairly violent and in “The Large Ant” by Howard fast this is quite obvious. Mr. Morgan kills the ant because he is human. It’s a human nature to look at something and react on at and be scared of it and this is quite unfamiliar. When human is scared they will react and they will respond with violence without thinking. Soon enough thee ignorant and naturally violent environment off humanity will catch up with us and will be the doom of humankind. We certainly are hopeless with the curse of fear and this is quite apparent in Mr. Morgan’s character in “The Large Ant”.
Bibliography * Symbolism in. (n.d.). Scribd. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/53165209/Symbolism-in * Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee — Do you have free will or is your life determined?. (n.d.). Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://kyleehanson.tumblr.com/post/3811127202/do-you-have-free-will-or-is-your-life-determined
* now., & &, G. c. (n.d.). Is Our Future Determined or Free?. RZIM Europe — Helping the thinker believe and the believer think. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.rzim.eu/is-our-future-determined-or-free
Bibliography: * Symbolism in. (n.d.). Scribd. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/53165209/Symbolism-in * Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee — Do you have free will or is your life determined?. (n.d.). Through the Eyes of Ky-Lee. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://kyleehanson.tumblr.com/post/3811127202/do-you-have-free-will-or-is-your-life-determined * now., & &, G. c. (n.d.). Is Our Future Determined or Free?. RZIM Europe — Helping the thinker believe and the believer think. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.rzim.eu/is-our-future-determined-or-free
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
These individuals distinguish between external and internal causal factors to argue that inner psychological states are compatible with determinism because these internal states are determined by the agent. van Inwagen disagrees with this statement because he claims that it is difficult to specify which futures are open to us and which are not. Additionally, compatibilists must deny the No Choice Principle because if an individual believes in a deterministic system, they cannot simultaneously accept that there is at least one instance where one event does not uniquely determine the next. To continue, libertarians believe that determinism is incompatible with free will but there is free will in the sense that individuals seem as though they could have acted differently. van Inwagen argues this view by giving an example in which an individual is faced with a choice in which if the pulse in their brain goes to the left of a fork, the individual will make one decision and if it goes to the right, the individual will make the opposite decision.…
- 1546 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
a controversy between whether or not a person has free will. He states that a determinist,…
- 479 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to determinism and free will, there are two categories which determinists would side with. Either they are a soft or a hard determinist. Determinism is defined as the theory that “everything in the universe..is entirely determined by causal laws, so that whatever happens at any given moment is the effect of some antecedent cause” (Pojman & Fieser, Free Will and Determinism, p. 388). In this essay, I will be reviewing philosopher Baron d'Holbach's arguments against the concept of free will in the perspective of a hard determinist.…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Explain determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism, and discuss in detail which you think is the most convincing position in the free will debate.…
- 200 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Free will is a concept of much debate. I base my conception of free will on Erasmus's definition. Erasmus argues that free will is “The human will by which man is able to direct himself towards to turn away from what leads to eternal salvation”(6). My conception of free will alters the last clause and instead substitutes, man’s ability to direct himself towards and turn away from success, in addition to having the freedom to define such success. In this paper I will argue that man’s will is never completely free; it is always dependent to some extent on God. I will analyze the philosophical theories of Erasmus, Luther, Descartes, Spinoza, and the movie The Adjustment Bureau, and the arguments they they make in their…
- 2353 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
The debate between freewill and determinism stems from the apparent conflict between the universal rule of causality that is deeply rooted in nature, and between the apparent ability of human beings to choose between multiple courses of action in order to lead to the most desirable outcome. The universal rule of causality simply claims that inorganic matter such as tables, chairs and rocks are acted upon by whatever forces affect it, however, human beings seem to be an exception to this rule by their unique ability to ponder about how to go about making decisions in their life and which…
- 1181 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…
- 1021 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…
- 1475 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…
- 1857 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Free will: the philosophical assumption that individuals can dictate their own lives free of any social constraint or external factors.…
- 1753 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, by Sober, it mentions three views of freedom: hard determinism, libertarian, and soft determinism. Being a hard determinist means you do not have free will, an incompatibilist, and causal determinist. Libertarians are free and incompatibilist; soft determinist are people that say that we do have free will and are causal determinism. An incompatibilist has many options and is free to pick any one of the choices. A causal determinist is when events turn out the same even if you go back in time. In this essay I am going to argue that we should be hard determinist because we do not have free will to choose our genes and environment.…
- 539 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Various philosophers have explained iterations of free will in more depth, resulting in a greater number of issues connected to it. When arguing against free will, the concept of determinism is advanced as the main argument. Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision, and action, is predetermined. The main perceived threats to our freedom of will are various alleged determinisms. These can be physical, psychological, biological or theological in nature. For example, suppose you meet a person you are instantly attracted to. Practically every thought and emotion in your body commands you to approach the person but for various reasons you hold back; the moment doesn't feel right.…
- 157 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
I understand that Certain information will need to be shared between Staff and outside organisations and that information can only be disclosed if it is in the residents best interests or for the protection of others or in the interest of public health, investigation, or if a serious crime committed.…
- 611 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays