Preview

Hume's Argument of Future Matters of Fact

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hume's Argument of Future Matters of Fact
Hume’s argument of future matters of fact
According to David Hume, statements concerning future matters of fact always require empirical support. It is impossible to have knowledge of such facts without grounded impressions, or experience. Hume declares that justification for claims of future matters of fact are inferred from cause and effect relationships rather than from tangible experience. Similarly, cause and effect relationships are recognized through experience. Human’s naturally reason inductively, or in other words, use experience to establish beliefs about things which have yet to be observed. Hume argues that through such assumptions, it is impossible and rather foolish to derive any reliable conclusions about the world based on inductive reasoning.
Hume argues future matters of fact are considered knowledge on the basis of cause and effect relationships. He declares that in order to satisfy our knowledge of future matters of fact, it is necessary for us to foremost question how we arrived at the knowledge of cause and effect. Cause and effect relationships are plainly unattainable; we can only make inferences concerning future matters of fact. Hume suggests, “No object ever discovers, by the qualities which appear to the senses, either the causes which produce it or the effects which will arise from it; nor can our reason, unassisted by experience, ever draw any inference concerning real existence and future matters of fact” (Hume, 241). Humans have habit of visualizing one event following another, and declaring the first event causes the second. Hume rejects such an idea, arguing that we cannot declare any inferences taken from past experiences as knowledge of future matters of fact. As Hume addresses the principle of induction, he claims that there is always room for error when making and inductive inference.
Rejecting the principle of induction, the idea that the present will resemble the past, Hume states that “The mind can never possibly find



Cited: Hume, D. (2008). An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In J. Feinberg & R. Shafer-Landau, Reason and Understanding (pp. 237-263). Boston: Wadsworth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume criticised the teleological argument in plenty of ways as he believed that the argument was deeply flawed.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduced by Ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle (5th century BC), induction is a process that begins with the observation of natural phenomena and ends with the assembly of a scientific law to describe the general regularity of said phenomena. This intuitive process was accepted within the scientific community for centuries yet the basis of Aristotle’s method relies entirely on human ability to simply observe natural phenomena, see a pattern and make observational statements. If there were to exist a large number of observational statements that were repeated under several varying circumstances in which no conflicting observation was made, these observational statements could then be promoted to universal or generalised statements that refer to all events of a particular kind given certain conditions (SCIE1000 Lectures…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    miracle hume essay 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hume uses both an a priori and inductive argument to challenge miracles, which comes from his definition of a miracle as “a transgression of a law of nature which a particular volition of the Deity interposition of some invisible agent.” Hume’s challenge relies on if the laws of nature are fixed, if they are, and the definition of a miracle is that it breaks the laws of nature, then this is a contradiction. If miracles are a contradiction then it is rational to believe that they do not occur. A Biblical example of a miracle is Jesus walking on water - it goes against what we know about gravity and about the properties of water which are both scientific and natural laws, and so it is hard to believe that his could of happened, but due to witnesses it is thought to be true. Hume argues against witnesses as he says it seems more logical to say that the witness is incorrect than to argue that the miracle actually happened.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psyc 4100

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rychlak, J. F. (1998). Is there an unrecognized teleology in Hume 's analysis of causation?. Journal Of Theoretical And Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 52-60.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume arguments from testimony suggest that the only evidence we have of miracles occurring is from testimonies from other people. He says that the likelihood of a miracle occurring compared to that of the witnesses being mistaken. As Hume is a sceptic he argues that the most rational belief in anything must have evidence to back it up.…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s arguments were actually responding to the argument as outlined by thinkers such as Plato, Cicero and Aquinas. Hume analyses four of the main premises laid out in a standard Teleological argument and deconstructs them in order to find fault within the logic. The first one that I shall present is Hume’s argument to disparage the claim that one can find only order and good design within the universe. Hume throws the omnipotence and benevolence of God into question when he highlights the fact that there is much suffering and pain and evidence of bad design in the world around us. It is easy to suggest that the world is not harmonious within the workings and regulations of itself and this is shown by the vast amount of suffering, disease,…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, David Hume writes that “Whatever exists must have a cause or reason of its existence; it being absolutely impossible for any thing to produce itself, or be the cause of its own existence.” He claims that in going through the causes and reasons of each existing thing that we either have to “go on in tracing in tracing an infinite succession, without any ultimate cause at all”, (which Hume states is “absurd”) or we “must at last have recourse to some ultimate cause, that is necessarily existent” (Hume). Even at the most basic level of life, sub-atomic particles, cannot produce themselves; something is necessary for their existence. Hume then states:…

    • 861 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes that impressions are livelier than ideas. A great example he gives is the idea of love. Isn’t feeling love more lively than watching a movie about two people being in love? I would agree so. Often times Ideas can be made up or nonexistent.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument Hume uses to prove his Copy Principle is derived from the idea of God. Hume explains that God, “as meaning an infinitely intelligent, wise, and good being” is constructed from the reflections of our own human mind; that all ideas of God are copied from a lively perception that corresponds to the limitless attribute of God. The second argument asserts that conceptions are produced only when one has had a feeling or sensation that is introduced to them beforehand; “a blind man can form no notion of colors, a deaf man of sounds” (540). This also explains differences in conceptions, as others may possess many senses which we have never been introduced to, through the only manner which an idea can have access to the mind; feeling and…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume begins section six of “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” by stated right out that chance does not exist, but is merely a result of our ignorance of the causes behind any given event. He argues this by relating probability and belief. Belief arises when probability is at its most high. According to chance, any event may turn out anyway. Hume illustrates his point with a die. If a die were marked with one figure on four sides, while another figure on the other two sides, then it would be most probable that the die would land on the former side. If, however, the die had a thousand sides marked in one manner and only one side marked differently, then the probability of landing on the former mark would be higher. As such, our belief or expectation of this result would be higher1. As the chance of landing on one side of the die increases, the probability of that result also increases, and as such our belief in that result increases. As experience tells us that one result is more probable then another, so our mind construes the belief in that result. The nature of belief is thus constructed, as an experiment is repeated (such as the tossing of the fictional thousand sided die) and the result shows itself to be the same more often then not, then the idea of obtaining that result becomes more concrete and…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    David Hume Research Paper

    • 6305 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Hume could not (as he does) carry out his science of human nature. One might reply that…

    • 6305 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays