· Examine at least two historical theories of emotion and arousal as they relate to human motivation.…
| |Compare and contrast the psychoanalytic, humanistic, and diversity views of human motivation.| | |…
Even though he had classified justice as one of the artifial virtues, he later identifies it, along with benevolence, as a social virtue. He argues that although benevolence is necessary for self-enjoyment, it cannot be reduced entirely to self-interest as the Hobbesians think but tends rather to promote social welfare. While benevolence is an original principle in human nature, justice is not. The need for rules of justice is not universal. It arises only under conditions of relative scarcity, where property has to be regulated to preserve order in society. For Hume the language of morality implies some sentiment common to all mankind, which recommends the same object for general approval. It also implies some universal and comprehensive…
A miracle is often defined as an extraordinary event which cannot be explained either by natural or scientific laws. However, this definition of miracles often varies person to person. R.H. Holland defines miracles as a “remarkable and beneficial coincidence that is interpreted in a religious fashion,” whereas David Hume, writing during the Enlightenment period as an empiricist claimed that miracles are both improbable and irrational. In his book, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume defined miracles as a violation of the laws of nature. Although Hume may say that miracles are the least likely of events, that does not lead on to say that they do not occur at all; it is possible to say that they do occur but it is not very likely. Also, it is difficult to explain these extraordinary events, and so a miracle is a good way of explaining these things. This essay will discuss Hume’s claim, and will come to the conclusion that miracles are not the least likely of events.…
Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…
The interaction of emotional and arousal to motivation was gathered in 1884 and 1885 from William James and Carl Lange. James and Lange believed a person’s emotions occur because of Psychological events that they suffer from. For instance, if a person is the victim of a tragic event, this can cause post-traumatic stress syndrome. This cause’s fear from that movement on and at times causes the person to withdraw from the event or anything pertaining to it due to fear.…
Hume argued, that although sometimes a good motive does not bring about pleasurable outcomes, we are able to appreciate it . This is made possible by our imagination and our belief of cause and effect, with which we are able to visualize thus appreciate the supposed good outcomes of such a good motive under normal circumstances, and thereby approve of the motive, even if the imagined good outcomes are not realized in the reality . A good motive with good resulting effects realized certainly strikes us more strongly, but when the good effects are not resulted, we tend to correct our sentiment because luck carries no moral value .…
Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…
A motive is a specific need or drive that arouses you and directs your behavior toward a certain goal. Emotion refers to the experience of feelings, (such as fear, sadness, happiness, etc)…
Stroud, B. Hume: The Arguments of the Philosophers. Suffolk: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc, 2002.…
Nathaniel Hawthorne was an intelligent man, which who also and a nervous breakdown. He won a lot of awards, but “he became increasingly dissatisfied, as if his dark insights in the human heart cast gloom into his own.” (Daniels 296) He became into a human that would give his heart to the devil. He wouldn’t talk to anyone and would just walk the village minding his own business. Hawthorne consumed many stories and poems for example, “In 1837, Hawthorne emerged to publish a collection of stories, twice-told tales.” (296) After his dark stage disappeared, he then started to make more stories. He thought that if his gloomy stage was gone, then he could produce way more stories than usual. In Hawthorne’s stories, he uses…
David Hume was a Scottish philosopher who lived in the mid to late 1700’s. He wrote on a variety of topics, metaphysics, aesthetics, ethics, the self, and more. However, some of his most intriguing and significant work was done on the philosophy of religion. Though he was often very definitive and straight forward in his works, he never made a truly positive statement regarding his religious beliefs. Much evidence exists suggesting that he was an atheist, however he often seems to waver and frequently hints at a belief in the divine, despite his skepticism.…
Nathaniel Hawthorne has received the title of “American genius” because of his literary works such as “The Scarlet Letter” and “Young Goodman Brown.” Many critics agree that Nathaniel Hawthorne is a writer of “Dark Romanticism,” which led him to be famous because he ventured away from transcendentalism. There are many reasons as to why Hawthorne stands out from his fellow colleagues who were part of his movement from the transcendentalist to dark romantic. One of the reasons being that Hawthorne wrote about “how humanity was an evil creature, perpetually plagued with sin, guilt, and morbidity.” He also based his books and short stories on the Puritan community and how he portrayed that everyone had an “other.” His use of allegory and symbolism…
These traits are the building blocks of our identity and should be fed in order to better understand who we are. These two men seem to agree that our passions needs special attention in order to have an enduring and comfortable life. Despite being different, they share similar ideas, one being that humans can be similar to animals therefore cannot separate reason from passion. Philosophers like Rene Descartes believe reason triumphs passion, and we are distinct from animals because of God and superior intellect. Without God involved, I believe that in an isolated state away from any outside influence that we are naturally selfish and greedy; in the sense that we feed off our desires similar to animals. We have the will power to do good, but giving into our wants and needs is easier to us. Because of this quality, we are taught to control our emotions, passions, desires and feelings to make sense of our surroundings, but at the same times. Hume and Southworth are both related by opinion and may even support each…
I agree with Hume when he presented the idea of out constancy and coherence exist but I am yet to understand the term external world. I do believe however, that Hume made some very irrational assumptions when he said that the imagination is flawed. I believe that humans ability to imagine is one of the main contributor to human’s survival for many centuries. Hume states our imagination is faulty, breaks and combines idea, thus forming new ones. This now leads me to ask the question what exactly leads our imagination. Is our imagination lead by association, by contiguity, by resemblance or even by Illusion? If I cannot presently answer these questions then all the things I thought I truly knew and understood I do not anymore. Are most of the concepts and subject matter that once governed my behave could all be a fabrication of my imagination. As I reflect on the writing presented to me by Hume I think back to the question that we had once spoken about during class regarding what is your “true Self’? Hume study does help me to understand a lot about things we never rationally observed throughout our lives before. I can say that most of Hume’s writings are philosophically unjustified for he believed that he gave an accurate account of how humans arrive at the idea of…