Approved
Accepted
December, 1987
yoi T3. ;'987
Wo./;?
MESSAGE PROCESSING
-> MESSAGE EFFECTS
Fig.
1.1.
The research model frequently used in current humor appeals research.
By contrast, this dissertation suggests that research into humor's communication effects requires a fuller and more complex conceptual model (see figure 1.2). This expanded model implies (1) that humor is multidimensional, (2) that humor is a family of related
The Semiotic Relationship Between Humor and Message
HUMOR 1, HUMOR 2 AND HUMOR 3 A (Multiple Processes and Multiple Effects) ^
A
THE MESSAGE-
Central Route or Peripheral Processing
MESSAGE -^ EFFECTS
Fig.
1.2.
The proposed research model for humor appeals research.
8 phenomena which involve somewhat different processes that produce somewhat similar effects, (3) that the effect of humor largely depends on the type of message processing employed, and (4) that the specific relationship of humor elements to message elements determines the potential influence of one on the other. The current research model requires conceptual modification in several areas. Chapters 2 to 4 address these conceptual issues.
Chapter 2 presents evidence concerning the multidimensionality of humor. Chapter 3 discusses message structure, message processing and Then, using the
their implications regarding the effect of humor.
theoretical foundation laid out in chapters 2 and 3, chapter 4 develops a taxonomy of humorous message types. Chapters 5 to 8 test the descriptive and experimental value of the proposed model. Chapter 5 reviews several bodies of literature Chapter 6 describes an
concerned with humor's communication effects.
experiment