Preview

Hussein

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
316 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hussein
Hussein Ali
BLW – Case problems
Chapter 18

18-1
Issue: Which one of Cohen and Windsor is entitled to get the deposit?
Rule of Law: Liquidated Damages
Application: Liquidated damages means that provisions must paid by the breaching party to the party that has been breached.
Conclusion: Cohen gets to keep that deposit

18-3
Issue: Should the court hold, as VanHorn argued, that Barton did not take reasonable steps to mitigate her damages?
Rule of Law: Mitigation of Damages
Application: Under the contract of Mitigation of Damages, when a breach of contract occurs, the innocent injured party is usually held to a duty to mitigate or reduce the damages that he or she suffers. In this case, VanHorn suffers from the contract that Barton breached.
Conclusion: Barton is responsible for mitigating VanHorn’s damages.

18-5
Issue: In whose favor should the court rule, and why?
Rule of Law: Waiver of Breach
Application: Under the doctrine of Waiver of Breach, the waiver erases any past action on the contract; the contract continues as if the breach had never occurred.
Conclusion: The court should rule in Clark Construction’s favor.
18-7
Issue: What are the requirements to recover on a theory of quasi-contract?
Rule of Law: Quasi Contract Application: To recover under the theory of quasi contract, the party seeking recovery must show that 1- the party has conferred a benefit on the other party. 2- the party conferred the benefit with reasonable expectation of being paid. 3- the party did not act as a volunteer in conferring the benefit. 4- the party receiving the benefit would be unjustly enriched if allowed to retain the benefit without paying for it.
Conclusion: The requirement that is most likely to be disputed in this case is whether the party receiving the benefit would be unjustly enriched if allowed to retain the benefit without paying for it or not.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Is the liquidated damages clause valid in this case? (Hill, 2014) Now 17,000 was valid and reasonable in light of the language of the contract and to what both Sun Ship and C & H agreed on. But to further penalize was not reasonable. I agree with Sun Ship that in that they tried to invoke the hindsight rule, claiming that “it shouldn't have to pay liquidated damages that were so far out of proportion to the actual damages” (Mihai,n.d.) The situation as it developed was different from the anticipation and the barge was not ready but neither was the tug. C and H were, in fact, able to find other shipping and their crop did not rot, nor were their customers left without sugar. I do believe in the claim by Sun that the actual damages suffered, does not justify the liquidated damages enforced by…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 WEEK 4

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 4758 Words
    • 20 Pages

    If the subject matter of a contract turns out to be more valuable than one of the parties believed it would be, that party can rescind the contract.…

    • 4758 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Dunlap did not present evidence that the practice can show that a protected group was adversely impacted.” Since he could not prove his claim by challenging the process used in his own interview the courts decided that the disparate impact claim would not be enough sufficient evidence to use against Tennessee Valley…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pichelman vs. Barfknecht

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue: Should Arnold and Sylvia Barfknecht have been convicted of a negligent tort against Betty Pichelman?…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A deeper focus and analysis on the Fifth Circuit’s jurisprudence in this area was required. The analysis focused on the past history of how the Fifth Circuit approached sufficiency arguments, and how its approach had shifted to the present (with Rubio’s case as the newest example). See footnote 3 and 4, and the enormous research required (footnote 4 as roughly 36 or more cases firming up a consistent pattern of Jackson’s application in sufficiency cases). By extension, additional time was necessary to detail how and why the Fifth Circuit had shifted in its application of Jackson over time.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The alleged that defendant breached the parties' agreement when his partnership terminated the Deferred [**2] Compensation Agreement.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 2

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 1 W300

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Claimants in actions for breach of contract and in tort will usually damages as the principal remedy…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lwc1 Study Plan

    • 4774 Words
    • 20 Pages

    rely. The plaintiff did so. The only way to avoid injustice is to enforce the…

    • 4774 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS Part II Recap • • • • CISG Transactions covered under CISG Choice of Law Interpretation of CISG- Objective and subjective test • Formation of a contract; offer, acceptance, withdrawal, acceptance with modification. Overview • Buyer’s and seller’s obligations • Buyer’s and seller’s remedies GENERAL STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE • Both buyer and seller have to perform their obligations under the contract. • A party that fails to perform is in breach. • The party that does not breach has remedies.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shlensky V. Wrigley

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case proves that the defendant and the stockholders he represented were the majority stockholders, the plaintiff is a minority stockholder and the majority stockholders can control the policy of the corporation. The court was not necessarily in favor of what the majority…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critique on “Damages” as a remedy for breach of contract under Indian, American, English and Chinese law.…

    • 8885 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays