Ielts Task 2 Model Answer
IELTS
Writing Task 2 |Model Answer
Prompt: Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve the poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than the financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s challenging world, economic conditions of poorer societies have deteriorated whilst the affluent ones have increased their fortunes due to the unfair life situations stemming from Capitalism. In this respect, in order for poor countries to solve that issue relating to fund, some wealthy communities usually support, thereby establishing charities to raise money. Nonetheless, giving financial aid to poor countries might not be the effective way of preventing this financial problem for a number of reasons.
To begin with, one of the fundamental reasons why raising money for less rich countries cannot be an influential solution could be directly associated with the fact that the benefits of encouraging to their insufficient public facilities including education, health and transportation instead of giving money are obviously profound. In other words, money is not a single avoidance of poverty without the basic needs in the long term. Consequently, richer countries should give attention to poorer ones’ deficiencies, which tends to have a pivotal role to play in solving their monetary problems.
Secondly, so as to save the poor people suffering from the poverty, the wealthy should provide with an opportunity to support in building factories and train the people by giving courses of those establishments. It is an undeniable fact that this circumstance is a better solution for the poverty apart from giving financial aid to poor societies.
In conclusion, it would be reasonable to say that poverty could be ceased if the money is used in an efficient way.
Word Count: 248
Cem
Writing Task 2 |Model Answer
Prompt: Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve the poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than the financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s challenging world, economic conditions of poorer societies have deteriorated whilst the affluent ones have increased their fortunes due to the unfair life situations stemming from Capitalism. In this respect, in order for poor countries to solve that issue relating to fund, some wealthy communities usually support, thereby establishing charities to raise money. Nonetheless, giving financial aid to poor countries might not be the effective way of preventing this financial problem for a number of reasons.
To begin with, one of the fundamental reasons why raising money for less rich countries cannot be an influential solution could be directly associated with the fact that the benefits of encouraging to their insufficient public facilities including education, health and transportation instead of giving money are obviously profound. In other words, money is not a single avoidance of poverty without the basic needs in the long term. Consequently, richer countries should give attention to poorer ones’ deficiencies, which tends to have a pivotal role to play in solving their monetary problems.
Secondly, so as to save the poor people suffering from the poverty, the wealthy should provide with an opportunity to support in building factories and train the people by giving courses of those establishments. It is an undeniable fact that this circumstance is a better solution for the poverty apart from giving financial aid to poor societies.
In conclusion, it would be reasonable to say that poverty could be ceased if the money is used in an efficient way.
Word Count: 248
Cem