Preview

Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
78 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary
    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ethical Systems of Kant and Mill
    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Ethical Systems of Kant and Mill

    What part does happiness play in determining the morality of an act in a situation? Can a concept that ties morality to the search of happiness truly be rational? What of the opposite? Is it possible to view every situation with objectivity, never taking into account an emotion (like happiness)? The questions above concern themselves with the part of the central tenets of the ethical views of two very important philosophers, respectfully: John Mill and Immanuel Kant. The ethical theories that these two philosophers laid out clash with each other in fundamental ways, from how reason was defined, to the role that “happiness” played in determining the ethical choice in a moral dilemma. In the following pages, I will attempt to present and discuss the theories of Kant and Mill, pointing out what I perceive as weakness in said theories, as well as the possible strengths of each system.…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making

    In this analytical paper I’ll be analyzing a scenario about a five year old girl who is in renal failure and is in need of a kidney transplant. In this the father is the only one compatible with her, but he does not want to donate his kidney to save her life. The scenario will be analyzed through the deontological/Kantian and the consequentialist/utilitarian viewpoints in ethical decision making. It’ll also be analyzed by deciding which perspective would be relevant and a discussion of what I as a doctor would do following the ethical view point of my choice.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Business Ethics
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Business Ethics

    Immanuel Kant would never condone Scott’s behavior to use Bailey in the way he did. He would have called Scott’s actions immoral and unethical. Kant’s theory indicated that, “we should never use people” and “everyone, no matter who they are, should be both the legislator and the follower of moral laws” (Ciulla 95). He similarly stated, “For all rational beings stand under the law that each of them should treat himself and all others never merely as a means but always at the same time as an end in himself” (Ciulla 107). Kant would feel that it was Scott’s duty to make decisions without using another person as simply a means to an end, and that people should be treated as ends in themselves. By Scott attempting to make Bailey do these unethical…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Reason
    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Reason

    Immanuel Kant’s essays Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason led to his critique Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Guilt And Punishment
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant On Guilt And Punishment

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Ethical Theory Analysis
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Ethical Theory Analysis

    Kant’s formulas are then treated as candidates for a universal moral criterion for the permissibility of maxims, to be tested against our intuitions regarding the best cases that inventive philosophers can devise as apparent counterexamples. If one interpretation of Kant’s formula yields counterintuitive results, then another interpretation is proposed. The fate of Kantian ethics itself, as a moral theory, is then seen as depending on this enterprise of interpretation, and how well our best interpretation of Kant’s principle fares against our intuitions about the most challenging examples against which we can test…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Great Philosopher: Immanuel Kant
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Great Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

    Immanuel Kant is recognized as the greatest philosopher since Plato and Aristotle (Wolff). He is most widely known for his work in the fields of metaphysics and epistemology (McCormick). Kant published many works regarding his epistemological views, but his most famous work is The Critique of Pure Reason (McCormick). He noted that Descartes had “simply accepted consciousness as an…inexplicable fact” (Wolff). Kant utilized this observation to refute Descartes’ famous quote, “I think, therefore I am,” with a slightly revised premise— “I am conscious” (Wolff).…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Ethical Theory
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant's Ethical Theory

    Fraud is generally defined as an omission of a material fact or a misrepresentation of the truth, intended for personal gain or to cause loss to another party. The act of fraud is most commonly committed in order to deprive another of money, property, or a legal right. Fraud is considered criminal activity, and anyone who is affected by a fraudulent act has the ability to file a lawsuit to collect damages. J.C. Penny was accused of marking up the prices on their products and then discounting them to the original price in order to trick customers into thinking they were receiving heavy discounts and better deals. J.C. Penny committed this act for their own personal gain, and in doing so, they deprived their customers of money that they would…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Principle Of Morality Essay
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Principle Of Morality Essay

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis
    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world, but fails to account for how the world actually is, which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory In Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of
    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kant's Moral Theory In Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of

    Kant’s moral theory is a form of deontological moral theories. Deontology is regarding which choices are morally required, forbidden, or permitted, in other words, it guides and assesses human choices. Moral consideration affords to rights and duties. It is around the moral behaviour and act according to rational thought. In Kant’s moral theory, people, as a rational agent with free will, have the obligation to follow the rules of the actual moral law, otherwise, it is irrational behaviour.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant's Duty Defined Morality
    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kant's Duty Defined Morality

    Every ethical theory has its distinct perspective or view on what is morally correct or incorrect. Each theory has its defect, imperfection, and rebuttal. The moral principles described in this paper include Utilitarianism, Kant's Duty Defined Morality, Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, The Divine Command Theory, and Natural Law Theory. This paper argues that Kant's Duty Defined Morality is better than the other ethical principles. Kant's theory is not a consequential theory; thus the theory focuses on the action at hand and the duty one should commit because it is their job to. Kant’s Defined Morality judges the action itself, and is the most reasonable therefore; it is the best ethical theory and the most…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Virtue Ethics Analysis
    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Theory Of Virtue Ethics Analysis

    According to Kant, “it is a person that is the source of value. A person is of infinite worth, and what a person has, what a person does, what a person believes, what a person enjoys are all dependent upon the person’s and the person’s autonomy. Kant says that the virtues themselves evenness of temper, patience, can be turned evil if they are used for evil” (O’ Sullivan & Pecorino, 2002). By the words of Kant it would seem that he believes that people have the ability to be good and bad but the choice between good or bad can be impacted by the moral beliefs and nature of the person. A person can decided to be bad if the make up of them or behavior favor morally bad behavior. Kant seems to be touching on an idea that order that caused for morally wrong actions should not be followed.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Kant And Moral Law
    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparing Kant And Moral Law

    If someone is carrying out an act but they fear the consequences, then they are not acting in accordance with moral law. If someone is carrying out an act but they are only looking for a reward, then they are also not acing in accordance with moral law. Kant says, “Like a jewel, it would still shine by itself, as something that has its full worth in itself” (Kant 10). Kant is suggesting that a moral act is good in itself; it does not need to have rewards or consequences surrounding it to be worth something. It is a good act simply because it is a good act. Reasonable morality motivates people act morally without the influences of consequences or rewards. This is very important because you must do the ethical thing regardless of the consequences…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics