Blekinge Institute of Technology
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PAYBACK METHOD IN CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISION.
By
Alaba Femi, AWOMEWE & Oludele Olawale, OGUNDELE
Supervisor: Anders Hederstierna
Thesis for the Master’s degree in Business Administration Fall/Spring 2008
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PAYBACK METHOD IN CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISION.
By
Alaba Femi, AWOMEWE & Oludele Olawale, OGUNDELE
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MBA (Master of Business Administration)
Blekinge Institute of Technology
2008
Supervisor Anders Hederstierna
ii
Abstract Title: The importance of the Payback method in Capital budgeting decision.
Authors: Alaba Femi, Awomewe and Oludele Olawale, Ogundele
Supervisor: Anders Hederstierna
Department: School of Management, Blekinge Institute of Technology
Course: Master’s thesis in business administration, 15 credits (ECTS).
Background and Problem Discussion: The capital budgeting decision has been a very typical issue in the sustenance of a company. Several companies have lost their identity or liquidated due to wrong capital budgeting decision they made at one particular time or the other. Based on these prevalent problems in industries and the effect of globalisation on industries, it is important to use effective method to analyse investment before decision is made. Capital budgeting is extremely important because the decision made involve the direction and opportunity for future growth of the organisation. One of the traditional methods commonly used for capital investment appraisal by some organizations is the payback method, although this method has been criticized by academicians that it does not include the future cash flow and do not measure profitability. The wide acceptance of this method by practicing managers, has called for investigation as why is the method is still popularly used in organizations. In this thesis work, we
References: Blatt, J.M. (1979). Investment evaluation under uncertainty. Financial Mgmt, 8(2): 66681 [2] Brian Baldwin (1997). Economic justification of process improvement and automation projects, ABB Industrial Systems Inc. Cooper, William D. Morgan et al (2001), Margart Business Forum (online). Available from http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/116186585_1.html (accessed 19/05/08) Don Dayananda et al. (2002). Capital Budgeting: Financial Appraisal of Investment Projects Drury. C. Braund, S., Osborne. P. and Tayles, M. (1993). A Survey of Management Accounting Practices in UK Manufacturing Companies. Chartered Association of Certified Accountants. London Fotsch. R. J. (1983). Machine tool justification policies: their effect on productivity and profitability. J. Manuf. Systems, 3(2): I69 -195. Gert Sandahl and Stefan Sjogre (2003) Capital budgeting methods among Sweden’s largest groups of companies: The state of the art and a comparison with earlier studies. Hoskins, C.G. and Mumey, G.A., (1979). Payback: a maligned method of asset ranking? Eng. Economist, 25(l):53. 65. Lefley F. (1996). The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis, International Journal of Production Economics 44 (3) (1996) 207-224 and Northcott D. Northcott, Capital Investment Decision-Making, Academic Press, New York, 1992. Longmore, D. (1989). The persistence of the payback method: a time-adjusted decision rule perspective. Eng. Economist, 34(3): 1855194 McIntyre A.D and Coulthurst, N.J, (1986). Capital budgeting practices in medium-sized businesses A survey. A Research Report, Institute of Cost and Management Accountants, London. McIntyre A., Coulthurst N. (1987), Planning and control of capital investment in mediumsized UK companies, Management Accounting 65 (3) 39-40. Meir Statman and James F.Sepe. (1984) Managerial incentive plans and the use of the payback method. Journal of Business Finance is/ Accounting, 11(1). MJ du Toit and A Pienaar (2005). A review of the capital budgeting behavior of large South African firms. Meditari Accountancy Research Vol.13 No 1; pp19-27 Numminen Emil, (2008). Software Investments under Uncertainty, Pg 26 - 27 63 Oblak D.J. and Helm Jr. R.J. (1980). Survey and analysis of capital budgeting methods used by multinationals. Financial Mgmt. 9(4): 37741. Petty J.W., Scott Jr., D.F. and Bird. M.M., (1975). The capital expenditure decision-making process of large corporations Eng. Economist, 20(3): 159- 172. Pike, R.H. (1985). Disenchantment with DCF promotes IRR. Certified Accountant July: 1417 Rappaport. A. (1965). The discounted payback period. Mgmt. Services July/August: 30-36 Runyon, L.R. (1983) Capital expenditure decision making in small rms, Journal of Business Research 11 (3) 15-22. Schall L. D., Sundem. G. L. and Geijsbeek Jr. W. R. (1978). Survey and analysis of capital budgeting methods. J. Finance. 33(I): 281-288. Segelod E. (1995), Resource Allocation in Divisionalized Groups, Ashgate, Avebury. Statman, M. and Sepe, J.F., (1984). Managerial incentive plans and the use of the payback method. J. Bus. Finance Act, 1 l (1): 61-65. Stefan Yard (1999). Developments of the payback method Int. J. Production Economics 67 (2000) 155 – 167 Woods M Pokorny, M. Lintner, V. and Blinkhorn, M. (1985). Appraising investment in new technology Mgmt.Act, October: 42243 Yard S, 1987. Kalkyllogik och Kalkylkrav-Samband Mellan Teori och Praktik vid Kravstallande på Investeringar i Foretag, Lund University Press, Lund, 1987. 64