Preview

In Response To Meno Socrates Meaning

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In Response To Meno Socrates Meaning
Philosophy Midterm Paper Being compared to a torpedo fish may seem like an insult, but in Socrates’ case, it is nothing but a compliment because of the actions behind it. Socrates is known for his questioning and critical thinking abilities that might give him this nickname. Meno, frustrated by Socrates extreme questioning, says, “Indeed if a joke is in order, you seem, in appearance and in every other way, to be like the broad torpedo fish, for it too makes anyone who comes close and touches it feel numb, and now you seem to have had that kind of effect on me, for both my mind and my tongue are numb, and I have no answer to give you.” (Plato 81). Socrates has “numbed” Meno’s mind and essentially made him feel stupid. “In response to Meno, Socrates says he is willing to accept the torpedo-fish simile so long as it is true that the torpedo fish numbs not only other fish but also itself. “I myself do not have the answer when I perplex others,” he …show more content…
Through his constant questioning, torpedo fishing, and gadfly-like behavior, his intentions all were pure, and his actions helped the city to be active and to realize what they don’t know and begin to search for it. Socrates was not a bad person, he acted the way he did because he thought that was the way he should act. “For Socrates, the science of good and bad is simply the science of what condition is naturally, objectively, and actually the ideal condition for a human being.” (Ibid, 171). (Graham 40). So, when he acted like a torpedo fish, it was because morally, he thought that was the right choice. His accomplishments with his torpedo fishing led to great philosophers following his example, including Martin Luther King Jr. Torpedo fishing people is a good way for everyone in the city to stay active and not become sluggish or ignorant of the issues going on around them. If more people acted as Socrates,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After observing the unchangeable nature of Meno, Socrates uses his last attempt to differentiate between true knowledge and right opinion, which can lead to similar action and outcomes. His vital note is that right opinion is easy to lose, but true knowledge can be recollected at any time. A person can listen to another's teaching without pondering and assume that he knows the knowledge behind it, while he only possesses transient right opinion, like Meno's receipt of Gorgias's ideas. However, he will never grasp the real knowledge, which will encompass all specific situations and stay within an industrious, pensive, and open…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous charges against Socrates in the reading of The Apology. The basic charges against him include impiety, corrupting the youth, and theorizing about unknown topics. He does not believe in the gods that the state does, and therefore seeks for natural explanations to processes that occur in the world around him. He did not recognize the gods and introduced other new divinities. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth. Due to the constant asking of questions and inquiry, it lead him to try to discover new things about life. Since he looked for natural reason, he began to teach others about his understandings. His followers soon began to imitate his methods and expose other people as unwise which was a threat to the order…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like King, he was also very open-minded and practiced non-violence to solve problems. His main focus was breaking up problems into a series of questions, and the answers will gradually distill to the answer a person truly seeks. It’s similar to a hypothesis; if you’re lucky, it’ll only take a few steps, but if not, it might require a little more patience and critical thinking. This is now called the Socratic Method, a reversed process of elimination, in that better hypotheses are found by progressively identifying and eliminating those that lead to contradictions. This makes perfect sense; we can use a modern day example. You’ve probably heard this a lot, “there’s no such thing as a stupid question.” This is true most of the time. We are naturally born with curiosity, especially when we were younger. Remember those good old days when you just kept on asking “why” or “how” and so on? We don’t really notice it but all questions do have an answer, it’s just if you’re willing to look for it. Socrates was wise to know his limitations, and admit to the things he did not know…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates believed that his purpose, as a moral individual, was to achieve true wisdom of virtue and justice. With this considered, one may ask, "Then why did he accept punishment for crimes he didn't commit?" Socrates didn't care for fate, because he was only concerned for whether or not he and others were doing the right thing. This belief is shown to be evident when Socrates says, "You are sadly mistaken, fellow, if you suppose that a man with even a grain of self-respect should reckon up the risks of living or dying, rather than simply consider, whenever he does something, whether his actions are just or unjust, the deeds of a good man or a bad one." (Defence of Socrates, 28a).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Meno is the literary work done by Socrates the main theme in this dialogue/story is what is virtue. The dialogue between Meno and Socrates gives insight and question on what it is. It begins with Meno telling Socrates that he has been under the spell of Socrates and that he did not know what virtue was. This is what started the whole conversation between the boy, Meno, and Socrates. First off Socrates asks Meno what virtue is Meno listed examples about virtue but he did not the exact definition. Instead Socrates uses an analogy with the priestess and priests of who believe that people have an immortal soul. He also then uses the torpedo fish, which is a metaphor for when people are “paralyzed” by for being confused and having inconsistent.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the most part, Socrates speaks in a very plain, conversational manner. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed: with honesty and directness. He explains that his behavior stems from a prophecy by the oracle at Delphi which claimed that he was the wisest of all men. Recognizing his ignorance in most worldly affairs, Socrates concluded that he must be wiser than other men only in that he knows that he knows nothing. In order to spread this peculiar wisdom, Socrates explains that he considered it his duty to question supposed "wise" men and to expose their false wisdom as ignorance. These activities earned him much admiration amongst the youth of Athens, but much hatred and anger from the people he embarrassed. He cites their contempt as the reason for his being put on trial.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno Paradox

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If Meno were a Know-It-All on the subject of virtue, according to Meno’s paradox, Socrates’ questions should not have impacted him at all, and yet he seems impacted. The possibility that Meno superficially, not totally, understands the concept of virtue, is not a possibility for which Meno’s paradox allows. Socrates’ questions, then, move Meno from confident knowledge to a recognition of his own limitations, a movement which should not have been possible were Meno’s paradox valid. Additionally, Meno’s continued participation in the dialogue suggests an intellectual surrender of his paradox since his participation implies an investment in adding to his own…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates questioned the poets, the poets believed that they had the ability to speak brilliantly about various issues. However, Socrates revealed that although they each wrote amazing works of art, their intelligence did not come from wisdom, but instead, came from an impulse which wasn’t associated with their genius. As Socrates interrogated the craftsmen, he seemed to find men who genuinely contained much wisdom in their craft, but the men thought that their abilities in a certain field granted them to speak officially in other fields that they were associated with, although they truly knew nothing. Each case shows that Socrates confirmed that he would prefer to be as he is, stating that he truly knows nothing, rather than to be filled with a false impression of his own wisdom. Socrates states, “So I asked myself on behalf of the oracle whether I would prefer to be as I am, being in no way wise in their wisdom or ignorant in their ignorance, or to have both things that they have. I answered myself and the oracle that it profits me to be just as I am”…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exacty is virtue and how does one describe it? In the dialog Meno, two men, Meno and Socrates, attempt to define virtue. The dialog begins with Meno asking Socrates if virtue can be taught. Personally, I do not imagine that virtue can be taught. Meno does not exactly know what virtue is but guesses that it is to possess power and to retain good things. Socrates argues that learning is impossible because a soul has already learned everything from passed lives and that learning is simply recollection from those past lives. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Meno’s paradox and to determine how Socrates resolves it.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His “Socratic Method” of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (“Socrates Biography.”).…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato, in his book Meno, defines whether or not virtue can be taught. He does so by presenting two different characters; Meno is just a mere prop that Plato utilizes so that he could convey his real messages through Socrates. The book is written in the dialectic style and begins with Meno’s question if virtue is teachable. Socrates responds to Meno’s question by saying that in order to answer that question, one must first know whether virtue can be defined or not. Meno attempts three times to define virtue however, each time Socrates refutes his definition with a counterargument. By the end of his third attempt, Meno calls Socrates a “torpedo fish” because he feels as if all the knowledge that he had acquired from Gorgias was replaced by questions and uncertainty. In the aforementioned passage, in the doxical context, Socrates admits he has this effect on others because he himself doesn’t know . On the other hand, in the ethological context, Socrates is mocking the teachings of Gorgias and the Sophists. Moreover, in a broader perspective, through Socrates, Plato criticizes all who pretend like they have acquired all the knowledge attainable in this world.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following I will summarize Socrates' discussion with Meno: To enjoy fine things and to have power, A tag from an unknown writer. At the end of the day, Meno has depended on an outer power, as opposed to his own particular considering. Desiring something good, aren’t they a hazardous passage, particularly on the grounds that there is a clear inconsistency between asserting that individuals don't want something bad, and guaranteeing that what they want is actually bad. The arrangement is to understand that individuals need things under a certain portrayal. Desiring bad things and getting them, Socrates is teasing Meno with a procurement of his case that excellence is desiring fine things and being able to secure for one self.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays