Preview

In the short story, “The Bet” by Anton Chekhov, the

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
341 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In the short story, “The Bet” by Anton Chekhov, the
In the short story, ?The Bet? by Anton Chekhov, the banker and the lawyer had different opinions to the merits of capital punishment. To prove his point, the banker bet the lawyer two million dollars that he could not stay in solitary confinement for fifteen years. The lawyer left his cell five minutes before the stipulated time. In the literal sense, the banker won. However, the real winner was the lawyer.

It can be argued that capital punishment is immoral and unjust. At the same time, life imprisonment is also argued as immoral and unjust punishment. The lawyer spent fifteen years by himself to show that life imprisonment was not unjust. In his experience, the lawyer became more understanding of the world, nature, and life. He read many books and studied numerous languages. In a note to the banker, the lawyer wrote, ?Your books have given me wisdom?I know that I am wiser than all of you.? The lawyer proceeded to say, ?I depise wisdom and the blessings of this world. It is all worthless, fleeting, illustory, and deceptive?? The lawyer left his cell early to prove the point that he depised all that the world lived by. He did this in action and therefore did not receive the two million dollars. He proved that he gained wisdom which is more powerful than money.

The banker won the bet in the literal sense because he did not have to pay the lawyer. During the lawyers time in jail, the banker gambled all of his money in the stock market and he did not have the two million dollars. Morally, the banker lost the bet because he reached such a low point, that he even contemplated killing. The banker regreted that he ever made the bet. The bet affected his happiness and his day to day life.

The lawyer wrote, ?I marvel at you who exchage heaven for earth. I don?t want to undersatnd you.? This proved that the lawyer would choose death over life alone. In this sense, the lawyer did win the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The tittle “The Death Penalty: Justice for None” the author provokes a feeling to the readers of compassion and empathy making it seem like the death penalty is completely ignorant and wrong no matter what the consequence of the criminal is. The authors opinion about the death penalty is that the death penalty in the united states shouldn’t even be considered an option because it is cruel and unjust.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kim V. Son Case Study

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To summarize the case of Kim v. Son, Jinsoo Kim invested in two of Stephen Son’s corporations, which eventually failed, and Kim lost his money. Son felt bad, he and Kim got together and became very intoxicated and signed a “contract” in blood, stating that Son promised to pay Kim the money he lost and Kim agreed not to sue him. As it turned out, when Son sobered up he refused to keep his promise to pay Kim, so Kim filed a lawsuit based on this bloody contract. The judge declared the contract void due to lack of consideration (Beatty, Samuelson, Bredeson, 2013).…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I find that the most important part of this story is how the plot moves along so quickly. It also manages to describe successfully each conflict or major part of the story. The key element of the plot is when Zaroff and Rainsford play the game. The main conflict would be external which is man verses man, or Zaroff verses Rainsford. There are three major conflicts of man that can be found in Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game." In the rest of this short essay I will utilize the elements of compositions and also identify and explain the three conflicts of man found in this story.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Death, Reason, and Judgment: The American Experience”, which was posted on the ‘Filosofia Politica’ website (1), Ronald J. Allen (2) argues in a high academic level on the meaning and nature of errors in the imposition of capital punishment. Ronald J. Allen is the John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law at Northwestern University in Chicago. This paper will analyse and discuss the theories of the article and address two issues raised by Allen: the utilitarian and normative components of capital punishment, and the costs of errors of capital punishment.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur had been born and bred to be a lawyer, but he still felt privileged when he took his seat at the head of the plaintiff’s table in the courtroom.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors", three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation, the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw, he pulled out his consent, and the other two men killed him anyway, eating him. Five days later, the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple case over the battle of life and death, and it truly is. The two men, Dudley and Stephens, made a conscious decision to commit not only the crime of murder, but the atrocity of cannibalism. Crime is crime and law is law- when breaks a law and commits a crime, a punishment must ensue.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    millions of people will say you won. They'll read in the papers tonight that you smashed a bad law. You made it a joke!" (Lee and Lawrence 122). Drummond is teying to say that even though you happened to lose the case you won everyone else in the world.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty. This name alone would scare anyone and it is undoubtable the worst penalty a person could receive. It has been used for centuries, but today many argue that this punishment is not moral, while there are others that argue that if you are cruel enough to take a life, you deserve to get your life taken away, a life for a life. Louis Pojman and Jeffrey Reiman have debated this issue very closely, coming up with two opposite opinions on capital punishment. I will argue that even though I can see why Pojman thinks the way he does, he just doesn’t have enough evidence to back up his thesis when comparing it to Reiman’s. I will suggest an adjusted version of Pojman’s argument on deterrence for capital punishment by looking…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story titled The Lottery written by Shirley Jackson is an interesting story with an unpredictable ending. The story tells us about a tradition in a small town which is held every year. The tradition is called ‘the lottery’ where the ‘winner’ will be stoned to death. Actually it is a horrible tradition, but in the story it is considered usual, and even acceptable in the society. There are several irony that we can see in the story according to that ‘scapegoat’ tradition.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Gentleman of the jury, be merciful. For God’s sake, be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him. But let us say he was not. Let us say for a moment he was not. What justice would there be to take this life? Justice gentleman? Why I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this”. (Chap. 1, pg. 8) My analysis of this story weighs on multiple dynamics:…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson is a short story that without the symbolism of its characters, would amount to little more than an odd tale about a stoning. However, because of what each character represents and the way the setting helps to magnify those representations, it becomes a short story that is anything but short of meaning. The first character is probably the most obviously symbolic character of the story. Every word that leaves Old Man Warner’s Mouth reeks of tradition. He never stops criticizing new ideas about the lottery, the way it is run, or complaining about how things have changed for the worst, etc., etc. When Mr. Adams tells him that the residents of a neighboring village are considering doing away with the lottery, he says…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Second point is that a man ought to be repaid the same measure as his cruel act of murder. If you were to analyze such a statement with one eye closed then you would fail to see the bigger picture that exists. How can it be that we live in a world that simply puts away the unemotional individuals for useless rehabilitation? What will stop them from committing the same acts of injustice once released or a successful escape? In King’s critic she made mentions “an evil deed is not redeemed by an evil deed,” Demolishing the…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial draws on a rather bleak image of humanity the crime in question is first degree murder most serious charge tried in our courtroom’ the victim is not portrayed as innocent but as a ‘tough, cruel, primitive kind of man’ the lawyers on the case too are described as not doing their job properly and lacking the motivation to investigate the possibilities…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays