Referendums are a popular vote where the people are asked to decide on an important or constitutional issue directly. The key features of a referendum are that they the questions usually asked are single questions and are put forward by the government. In a referendum the citizens make the decision and it is always a YES/NO answer. However the conclusive answer is not binding on Parliament.
There are 4 main reasons why referendums are held in the UK. Firstly one reason for a referendum is when it has been promised in the party’s manifesto. For example the 2011 referendum held in the UK was to do with whether the system of Alternative vote should be adopted for the UK general elections. This was promised in the Manifesto pledge by the Liberal Democrats, which was used as a compromise between the conservatives and liberal democrats before forming the coalition government. The outcome of this referendum was a no by 67.9% to 32.1% voting yes. This means that political parties may promise a referendum if they are elected. If they go on to win the election, they deliver on this promise of a referendum.
Another reason why referendums are held in the UK is constitutional change and being able to make the change legitimate. An example of this is the 1998 referendum in London. The question asked was ‘Are you in favour of the government’s proposals for a Greater London Authority made up of an elected major and a separately elected assembly? A referendum was needed so the government can get the consent of the people to bring a major and consent to imply taxation increase that would be needed to introduce a major an elected assembly. This would not just affect the way the people are being represented by having a major to help introduce change and important matters concluded but also increase the amount of tax people are paying the be able to fund the Major and the elected assembly that were being introduced as well. This meant that the government got direct consent of the people and this legitimises the change. This is all needed to be able to make any change put forward in a referendum legitimate as it is a change to the constitution.
Lastly another reason why referendums are held in the UK is to avoid splits in political parties. For example in the 1975 referendum in the UK and the question the government asked was ‘Do you think that the UK should stay in the European community?’ This question was asked due to the fact that the Labour party couldn’t decide on this matter and the Prime Minister Harold Wilson ordered a referendum to settle the issue. In this situation it causes a few worries for the government due to the fact that the government are struggling to make a decision and are not working together. This poses the worry of not being able to agree in the future on matters that divide the conflict and could cause continuous conflict when having the solve issues and problems. This means that when the government are divided on an issue that could cause splits and collapse of the government the matter is put to the people and they make the decision instead. When the government puts forward a referendum they have to listen to the decision of the people. Therefore as well as the government preventing splits and collapse, it also portrays a sense of a strong and stable government as well as receiving the outcome from the people’s votes.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Another strength of the UK constitution is that there is sovereignty of Parliament. This is a strength as its elected body is accountable to the people. For example, MP’s are elected by the people whop stand in Parliament, which therefore means that the people in power have the general publics support to make decisions. But the nature of our constitution means that the location of sovereignty is a bit of a muddle.…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Frank Brennan’s informative book No Small Change: The Road to Recognition essentially looks at the prospect of potentially having a renewed referendum. Looking back at 1967, and the staggering amount of public support to both eliminate discrimination against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and to include Aborigines as part of the census, in essence ushered rudimentary human rights laws. That being said, Brennan observes the same opportunity to further the constitutions ongoing faults, issuing his respected opinion on how the country can push forward by delving into our failures and using them as a means of improvement. Though the prospect of a new referendum may seem far reaching on the outlook,…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1850 Britain was extremely far from being known as a democracy. This was due to the fact that the great reform act only extended the power of the vote from wealthy landowning men in 1832 to the wealthy middle class men. This meant that the majority of the population still were unable to vote. For a country to be democratic it entails to have certain circumstances which would include the majority of the population, every adult, having the right to vote for their country. There should also be an equal amount of seats distributed. All elections that take place should be run fairly and be restricted from intimidation and influence. Every adult should also only be entitled to one vote whereas at this time some individuals who went to university could vote in their university constituency as well as when they owned a property. It should be allowed that a person from any background is able to become an MP. By 1918 many of these circumstances had been met although not all. Although improvements had been met in Britain some aspects that would make the country fully become a democracy where not in place, therefore it can be argued that Britain was not fully a democracy by 1918.…
- 1328 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Referendums cause the public to become more educated and engaged, which would help the UK to become more democratic. For example, the Scottish referendum scheduled to take place next year has already started campaigning, with their “Yes, Scotland” campaign. Through activities like campaigning, the government can engage the public and they then become more educated about it.…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
(c) Is pressure group politics in the UK better described as pluralist or as elitist?…
- 4329 Words
- 18 Pages
Good Essays -
The 1967 Referendum was an extremely momentous event for Indigenous Australians; it signified that legal discrimination towards Aborigines would end soon, and promised full and equal citizenship to them. The Referendum not only affected their rights and freedoms, but also indicated that the nation was prepared to embrace Indigenous people as a part of their society and culture.…
- 333 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Evaluate how democratic in practice, initiatives and referendums are in making public policy. (30 marks)…
- 907 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A referendum is supposed to be enhancing democracy in the UK however they undermine our system of representative democracy, where candidates are elected to make decisions on behalf of their constituency. These candidates have a good understanding of politics and are elected to make decisions with the constituent’s best interests in heart. They are used, as most people in the UK do not have the political knowledge and understanding to make these important decisions. They are less likely to have access to key arguments and information than elected, full-time politicians. Furthermore in seeking a majority vote, referendums may undermine the rights of the minorities that are generally well protected by constitutions and judiciaries within representative democracies. They are detraction in a representative system of democracy and as such they surrender power of experts to the masses.…
- 1040 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Referendums could improve democracy in many ways, for example, it could help the votes and policies be more precise, because people are individually voting on specific policies, which therefore make the UK more democratic as it would be more representative towards minority groups in society. The referendums could also promote political education of the voters, as it can bring issues to attention by using the media, which would make the voters more aware of the…
- 671 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
On the 6th of November 1999 Australia was very close to becoming a republic. There was a 4% difference in the vote for the referendum with 46% of voters in favour for Australia to become a republic and 54% of voters against becoming a republic winning by the smallest margin. But why become a republic?…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Referendums are very harmful to a Representative Democracy. They undermine Parliamentary Sovereignty, allow our politicians to abdicate responsibility for major political decisions, prevent them from exercising their informed judgements, and can be manipulated by Governments. This is to say nothing of the premise of allowing important decisions to be made by an uninformed electorate that can be swayed by the Media Industry at the drop of a hat. And indeed, the worst case scenario of Tyranny by Majority is one that should not be disregarded. Of course, Referenda are not entirely harmful. They are useful tools for ensuring that elected Governments do not overstep their boundaries…
- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
To be able to pass laws and money onto Aboriginal Australians the constitution had to be changed. Therefore a referendum had to take place over two issues;…
- 349 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Back in Australian history, many people would stop voting, to a point where they made it mandatory. The voting system was brought in 1924 and the turnouts are usually not under 90%. The year the government had to enforce this rule it rose to about 32%. This system is still disproving what people say, that the citizens were forced against their own will. But it is supported by 70% of the citizens. More than 23 countries have compulsory voting and like Australia, the benefits have outweighed the negatives.…
- 602 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
because it is the basis for the founding of the very system. The votes of all people ought to be…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, it could be argued that the more proportional electoral systems are the closest to a 'perfect' electoral system because they show what/who the people of the UK really voted for. One proportional system is the Single Transferrable Vote. This system operates by representatives being elected in large multi-member constituencies, the voting is preferential and also known as 'Voting Ordinal' where the voters can vote as many times as they want. The candidates much receive a quota known as a droop quota to actually become elected and if they reach this quota any excess votes are redistributed on the basis of 2nd preferences. The calculation used to work out the quota is (total valid poll/(seats+1))+1, which some people argue is too complicated for any elections in the UK, if no candidate reaches the quota then the lowest places candidate is eliminated and the second preferences of the people that voted for them are redistributed. This system is used successfully in many UK elections, it's used in Northern Ireland for elections such as in the Assembly, for local government elections and EU parliament elections. The Republic of Ireland and Scotland both use it for Local Elections.…
- 2195 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays