INCREASING THE SKYRANGER’S AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE THROUGH SHAPE OPTIMISATION OF THE WING
KENNEDY KAIRU MBUGUA
0803460
SUPERVISOR: RAY KIRBY
ME3309
Overview of the Project
The Skyranger along with other ultra-light home build plane are designed and constructed to be extremely cost effective due to the low price at which they are marketed. In this report the aerodynamic performance of the Skyranger’s wing is analysed and particular modifications such as the implementation of wing twist and the introduction of wingtip devices are discussed as possible retrofits. Issues being investigated: induced drag caused by the production of lift especially though take-off and landing configurations in aircraft, parasite drag caused by the modifications such as winglets, implementations of the modifications. Concluded is the success of the project and whether the proposed modifications are a realistic improvement to the Skyranger taking into account all design factors such as cost, complexity of the design and build and weight changes.
Aims, Objectives and Milestones.
The aim of the project is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Skyranger wing using forms of shape control on the wing planform. This will be achieved through the following objectives.
Back Ground Research
This will be split into two sections that will look into the background wing tip devices and wing twist
Wing Twist
In 1899 the wright brothers were experimenting on wing twist as a means of controlling the rolling motion of an aircraft. This was accomplished though many hours of watching birds in flight when Wilbur Wright concluded that “regain their lateral balance when partly overturned by gust of wind by torsion of the tips of the wings” (Padfield and Lawrence 2005). This is considered as one of the most important discoveries of aviation and also the origins of wing twist. Ludwing Prandtl published the
Bibliography: 1. Airbus Airliner Information And Facts (2003).Aviation Explorer. Available at http://www.aviationexplorer.com/Airbus_A319_Aircraft_Facts_Photos.htm . [accessed 26/11/2010] 2 3. Bill Kuhlman and Bunny Kuhlman (2003) Twist Distribution for Swept Wings.:The Soaring Digest (2003). Volume 20 RCSD page 4 – 9. 4. Boeing (1995) A Brief History Of The 747 Commercial Transport. Available at http://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/747.html [accessed 22/11/2010] 5 8. Fitzsimons B. (2005) Winglets Help Refine Flow and Increase Efficiency. Aviation International News. Maintenance and Modification. [2005]. 9. G. D. Padfield and B. Lawrence. (2005) The Birth of The Practical Aeroplane: An Appraisal of The Wright Bothers’ Achievements In 1905. The Aeronautical Journal [2005] TAJ page 4.24 -4.25 10 11. Hall of Fame Members (2010) William E. “Billie” Somerville 1869 -1950 .available at http://www.ilavhalloffame.org/members_10.htm [accessed 26/11/2010] 12 13. Jan Roskam (2003). Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight: Controls. Review of Aerodynamic Fundamentals. (4th edition) Kansas. Design Analysis and Research Co-Operation (DARcoporation) 14 15. Langevin G. S. and Overbey P. (2003) Concept to Reality: Winglets. NASA Langley Research Centre. 16. Ray P. Matherne, (2009) Fuel Savings through Aircraft Modification: A Cost Analysis. Volume 1: page 18 -26. 17. RC Universe (2007). Span wise Lift and Stall Sequence. Available at http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_9525755/anchors_9528367/mpage_1/key_/anchor/tm.htm#9528367 [accessed 20/11/2010] 18 19. W. F. Phillips (2004): Lifting-Line Analysis for Twisted Wings and Washout-Optimised Wings. Journal of Aircraft [2004] Volume 41 JoA 128 -130 20 21. Warren F. Phillips (2005) New Twist on an Old Wing Theory. Aerospace America [2005] AA page 27 – 30 22