Against
India being a strong democratic country doesn’t really need a dictator. It may just lead to disruption.
India is a big country. People live in harmony and are known for their unity. A dictator may not be able to maintain this.
Few people may again misunderstand dictatorship and may think it defies the purpose of freedom.
Dictatorship may bring very short term changes. A country needs a strong government.
Dictatorship may introduce communal differences depending on the community of the dictator.
Human rights can be certainly bypassed.
It may lead to disorganization and malfunctioning of the law and order system of the country.
For
A dictator can easily help us get rid of the dirt in politics.
A very small community of people actually understands the meaning of democracy and don’t make misuse of it.
For over decades, India is trying to get rid of poverty, may be, a dictator can help in this aspect.
A dictator can help the citizens realize the meaning of democracy and freedom.
Whether a country has a dictator or not, freedom of speech and rights is what matters to any citizen. It is a myth that smaller countries usually need dictatorship. We cannot forget the smaller country has the same human species with the same human rights as in other countries.
Discussion board though Dictatorship may banish dirty politics and corruption from india, I think that choosing is a dictator will end the right to speak ability which evrey indian has!! peole may lost democracy.. and ultimately dictatorship will give born to another hitlar or gaddafi or saddam where human right is was snatched. So india will be a heaven of silence.
. India needs strong dictator
India doesn't need a dictator but, it certainly need a strong democratic alliance, which can take some tough decision on the problems which are rising in India. India need a group of people who are not afraid to take some strict actions and go against the law if