Preview

Indian Removal Act Research Simulation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1184 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act Research Simulation
Indian Removal Act: Research Simulation Paper
The Native Americans had lived in America for generations. They were already here when the colonists came from Britain. Colonists survived because of the Native Americans’ help. When the colonists fought the Revolutionary War, some of the Native Americans allied with the British, but some fought on the colonists’ sides. Britain armed some Native American tribes to fight against us in the War of 1812, but some stayed with us the whole time. Settlers wanted the Native Americans land because it was fertile. Native American land was wanted by the settlers. Eventually, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act to force the Native American off their land and march in terrible conditions to their new home.
…show more content…
In the History Channel Video, it states,” “Jackson was a man who wanted to just forge ahead and say its and either-or. Either people join us in the United States in our way of life and abandon their own way of life or they get out of the way and that became the foundational idea behind the removal policy.” President Andrew Jackson wanted the Native Americans off their land, so he issued the Indian Removal Act. He wanted the settlers to have more land to expand west. He wanted them to stop living in their way and to leave their land. The video shows that Jackson just wanted the Native Americans out. He wanted to get the Native Americans out of the way, so he issued the Indian Removal Act. He wanted the Native Americans to become the everyone else or leave. The video shows that the Indian Removal Act was issued to move the Native Americans out of the settlers’ ways. It also shows that it set a precedent. This set a precedent that was repeated many times. People looked at they way Jackson forced the Native Americans to give up their land and followed his example to force other people out of …show more content…
In Andrew Jackson’s State of the Union Speech, it states,” “What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and occupied by a few thousand savages to our Great Republic… filled with the blessings of liberty, civilization, and religion. The United States will pay to send the natives to a land where they may live longer and possibly survive as a people. To save him from utter annihilation, the Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement.” Andrew Jackson thought the Native Americans were savages. He thought that America would be better of civilized because that would fill it with liberty, civilization, and religion. Jackson wanted a civilized nation without any Native Americans in it. He said that the government would pay the costs, but when people failed to fund the money, the Native Americans were forced to march in horrible conditions. The speech shows that Jackson wanted to move the Native Americans to new homes so the settlers have more land. It shows that the Indian Removal Act was issued to move the Native Americans to new homes from the government and to allow settlers to continue to expand west. This sets a precedent that we can move people to new places because it will benefit everyone. This speech shows that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Jackson's reasons for the Indian Removal is that they were in the way of the white people's expansion and that most were starting to break the laws of the land. The Indians should not be removed because it was their land first and it is inhumane.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronal Takaki opens our eyes to a different view of one of our early presidents. Andrew Jackson was for removing the Indians, “He supported the efforts of Mississippi and Georgia to abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 81). He believed that the deaths of Indians meant that America was advancing civilization. Andrew did not feel guilty about what he stood for. Although they were laws that protected the Indians and their land, he did not obey them. Instead, he would ignore them, “Supreme Court ruled that…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act Dbq

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, the man representing the federal government as the President of the United States, actively pursued the Removal Act despite his previous opinion of Natives being so savage it were better to have them driven to extinction. (Wallace, 54) Later, he ruled that all Natives had been conquered and it was the U.S.’ responsibility to “save” these people by moving them away from their ancestral lands and West of the Mississippi. (Wallace,…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were in a foreign place. The Seminoles, Creeks, Cherokees, Choctaws, and Chickasaws Indian tribes are just a few examples of the Indians removed from their homes (Doc 4). In document four you can see that they all came from very different and unique lands and were all simply grouped into one territory. Andrew Jackson had no sympathy for them. He called them savages and recognized them as an inferior race (Doc 3). He also said that they had “neither the intelligence, the industry, the moral habits, nor the desire of improvement” to change their condition. Andrew Jackson publically degraded Native Americans everywhere and made his hatred…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 1830, President Andrew Jackson (1829–1837) signed the Indian Removal Act, which would take tribes of eastern Indians, living in settled states, and resettle them in specially designated districts west of the Mississippi River in Indian Territory (now the state of Oklahoma). Many tribes were affected by the Indian Removal Act. Most notably, the Cherokees, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, and Seminoles tribes were subjected to eviction (O’Neill 11). By the large, these tribes were known as the "Five Civilized Tribes" (weiser). The tribes had their own customs, traditions, government, and territories. Until When the Indian Removal Act was implemented, however, they found themselves equally casted out. Though the terms of their departures diverse, the Five…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Removal politics often left the relocated tribes more divided and violent then they had been than they had been before their move.” They later called the shift West the “Trail of Tears” due to all of the Indian devastation along the way. “The conditions of the journey were so brutal that more than 4,000 Cherokees died in temporary detention camps and in transit. The action, as well as the events leading up to it, clearly signaled that the Cherokee people, and Native Americans in general, had no real protection under the U.S. Constitution. Consequently, they had little opportunity or incentive to participate in the growing U.S. economy, despite having been successful trading partners of European merchants in the eighteenth century.” Andrew Jackson defended the Indian Removal Act by listing the advantages for Americans and Native Americans. Jackson believed that if the Native Americans moved west it would be a good economic opportunity for the American government. As you can see, the Indian Removal Act shows us that Andrew Jackson was not looking out for the best of the American…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the video Carol Berkin explains how Jackson ended up more powerful than Congress during his presidency. She also explains that even before Andrew Jackson’s presidency, he planned to remove the Native Americans from the land, which shows Jackson’s perspective. An unknown man also said that the Native Americans despised Jackson because of what he did. Carol Berkin explained how Jackson already wanted to move Native Americans off their land, even before his presidency. Jackson becoming president is a cause of the event. Another cause stated in the video is how Andrew Jackson was more powerful than Congress during his presidency. There were some people in Congress like Davy Crockett, Henry Clay, and Daniel Webster, who strongly opposed the Indian Removal Act. This was ignored by Jackson and the Indian Removal Act was administered. It shows Jackson’s perspective because he was very passionate about this act and refused to stop it for anyone. When Berkin talks about how Jackson wanted to take Native Americans off their land shows Jackson’s…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Guess who was behind that grand scheme. He even pressured the Choctaw to sign a treaty that forced them selves out of Mississippi. For the rest he sent troops to forcibly eradicate the Sauk and Fox from Illinois and Missouri and kicked the Chickasaw out of Alabama and Mississippi. He sent them all out west. The only Indians who put up a fight were the Cherokees. Their case went to the Supreme Court in Worcester vs. Georgia and they won because they were a political community who Georgia was not allowed to take land from. So what does Jackson do? He ignores the whole court ruling! They kept on fighting but only the Cherokees who were in favor of relocating to Oklahoma were considered representatives. They signed the Treaty of New Echota, which gave their land to the government for 5 million dollars and land in Oklahoma. This occurrence resulted in the infamous "Trail of Tears," one of the saddest moments in history. Jackson's treatment of the Natives was horrendous at the…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This can be seen in “President Jackson’s Message to Congress ‘On Indian Removal’ ” in the lines “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments”. The quote is about removing the natives from their homes to keep the state and federal governments from fighting, as well as giving the states more land, shown in the quote “It will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama…enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power”. Once the states gained the land, they would also gain more power and be able to defend themselves from an invasion without assistance. This shows that American settlers used the land to gain power and didn’t care for it as much as the natives did since they didn’t see it as sacred or have a physical bond to…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Indians have been around for more than 15,000 years. Although Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492, there were already people living in what is now called the United States. During the 1800s, American Indians had to deal with all the immigrants from Europe “invading their land”. The Native Americans tried to resist relocation due to the Westward Expansion, but because of reduced population through disease and warfare and assimilation with the immigrants, they didn’t have much of a choice.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President James Monroe believed that the land belonged to the Indians by binding treaties. He personally did not agree with Georgia’s claim but did propose a voluntary removal policy as the best solution in a letter to Congress January 27, 1825. The issue did not go away; the rich farm lands of the Cherokee and gold in the Georgia hills fueled the removal movement. President Andrew Jackson, an infamous Indian fighter, in his First Annual Address to Congress in December of 1829 let it be known that he was firmly committed to the removal of the eastern tribes to a region west of the Mississippi River. On May 28, 1830 The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress after months of bitter debate not only in Congress but in the press. This act did not authorize enforced removal of any Indians, but merely gave the President power to initiate land exchanges with Indian nations residing within the states or territories. However the Indians chose not to move and force was necessary. The Cherokee population numbered in the thousands and a gradual removal was planned; but when gold was discovered on Cherokee land the removal was hastened. During the autumn and…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine being woken up in the middle of the night and being taken out of one’s house by soldiers and moved from their homelands to a foreign land in the west. That is what happened to the Indians during the Indian removals. The Indian Removal Act gave the government enough power to seize the Indian’s land and move them west. The removals were meant to be peaceful and fair. They were also supposed to be done voluntarily (“Trail”). Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act on May 28, 1830. The Indian Removal Act affected many American Indian Tribes.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the past, treaties were signed to past away land for the Native Americans to stay and live peacefully. Andrew Jackson however ignored these treaties, and in response, he declared and forcefully moved the Native Americans in the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This was also after the case of Worcester v. Georgia where the Supreme Court also said that controlling Native American territory was unconstitutional.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He forced several Native American tribes to leave their lands by threatening them with powers larger than themselves and by obligating them to agree to treaties, unless they wanted to suffer even further. Moreover, President Jackson purposely defied a Supreme Court ruling to act on his beliefs regarding Indians. President Jackson also failed to assist Indian tribes as they trekked to the land hundreds of miles away from their homelands, making him responsible for thousands of Native American deaths. Clearly, the Indian Removal Act and the events that occurred as a result of it were unethical and an abuse of power by President Andrew…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays