Preview

Indian War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian War
During the late 1800s while the United States were making advancements into the west, the United States Government had to enforce certain policies towards the Native Americans that they came across. These policies although made the movement to the west easier for the United States, it did not serve the Native American population very well. The purpose of these policies was to assist the federal government in the formation of the transcontinental railway that would be traveling through the Native American land, also known as the “Great American Desert”. Even though the government policies were necessary, the harsh attacks and reservations towards the Native Americans were not. Though these treaties harmed the Indian’s, they served to be beneficial to the United States Government, because it allowed them to hold some control over the Indians and was effective in having them do what they needed them to do. Part of the policies that the federal government put into place included separating the Indians into reservations, interfering with their ability to roam freely. This caused the Native Americans to face suppression and poverty. Not only did their population have to deal with being divided amongst themselves, but also their land, the White settlers brought with them diseases that the Indians had no immunity to, and the availability of buffalo herds were diminished. These White settlers used the hides of the buffalo and left the meat to rot which evidentially hurt the Indians because they were unable have the meat to eat. These policies not only had an effect on the land that the Indians lived on, but had a major and detrimental effect on the livelihood of this population, making them sick and taking away one of their only sources of nutrition. Even though the federal government needed some of the land that the Indian’s had settled on, there could have been a more effective and progressive way of going about it that could have benefited both parties involved.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Sioux nation was a powerful proud nation which migrated and traveled over the Great Plains; their hunter gather lifestyle was encroached upon after the civil war in the United States. The Sioux were victimized socially politically and genocidal. The need to develop the western hemisphere of the United States, seen the lifestyle of the Sioux, as savage and a threat to settlers moving west. The government of the United States philosophy was that a good Indian was a dead Indian represented little hope of peace. Though peace treaties were inspired by the American government they held no validity and integrity as they were a means to eradicate the Sioux’s lifestyle. The American perspective in taming the west was to impose boundaries in the form of reservations on the Sioux and take away their freedom to hunt buffalo non-compliant Indians were deemed as hostile and classified an enemy of the United States, this ramification led into the Plains Indian wars.…

    • 3480 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All through the historical backdrop of the New World, there has been strife between indigenous populaces and approaching pioneers that usurp the land and assets. The uncovered histories and ficticious belief surrounding the Trail of Tears and the victory of the Incas and other local societies reminds us as readers that genocide and ethnic purifying leaves a sign of an awesome misfortune on American…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For native American Indians, this new opportunity for settlers proved even more costly, almost the entire culture was destroyed by either disease, famine, or murder. Many Natives believe that this culture war has never ended, even in today’s modern society. As History showed us, once these settlers colonized the Eastern portion of the New World, the Native were either killed, or had to move to the west, eventually living in their own settlements, known today as “Tribal Reservations”. Even today we as American’s believe that since we protect these Native American lands we were justified in our historical and in our own way oppressive actions.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    White settlers continued to settle on Indian land, pushing more Indians into poverty as a result of a lack of economic opportunities. Grant’s policy “ironically, led to some of the worst massacres in history” including the Battle of Little Bighorn. The Indian Appropriations Act of 1871, passed two years after Grant took office, called for the end of Indian Nations being described as American entities and ended treaty-making with tribes.4 This act and the Peace policy were two of Grant’s greatest laws passed with the intention of creating peace with the Indians.6 Although the “American Indians experienced some of the worst massacres and grossest injustices in history while Ulysses S. Grant was in office”, Grant’s work with Native American relations is believed to be one of the greatest aspects of his…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1850 and later on, several transcontinental railroads were built for easier transportation. The government also granted federal land for the laissez-faire ideologists for building the railroad (Doc. A). However, the process was slower than it’s planned. “More than 800 petitions were presents to Land Commission, and already 10 years of delays have elapsed and only some 50 patents have been granted” (Doc. B). The petitioners eventually have to sell their possessions little by little. Richest landholders ended up “living as objects of charity” (Doc. B). Red Cloud was also upset by the poor work of the government. He believed that “commissioners are sent out there to do nothing but to rob [us] and get the riches of this world away from us” (Doc. C). As the chief of Oglala Sioux, the Native American felt that the new American had come to kick them out of their lands and to steal their properties and possessions. In addition, Native American was suppressed by the colonists. “White man a teacher who tortured an ambitious Indian youth by frequently reminding the brave changeling that he was nothing but a “government pauper” (Doc.J). They lost trust and faith in the new government of the United States. Furthermore, the freight rates had done more injuries to the Western region than anything else. “The railroads have retarded its growth as they first hastened it” (Doc. I). F.B. Tracy…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of 1812, America became involved in a conflict with the Native Americans. The British armed Native Americans to fight the Americans. After this conflict was mostly settled, Jefferson made the Louisiana Purchase. Settlers were sent to expand west, but the land the settlers were sent to explore was occupied by Native Americans. Jackson created the Indian Removal Act to get them off the land, leading to the Trail of Tears where Native Americans were forced off their land and taken to Oklahoma. The multiple perspectives of the sources concerning the Indian Removal Act and Trail of Tears help shape the reader’s view of these events by explaining what happened, the causes of it, and the perspectives of the people involved.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indian Removal Dbq

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the early to mid-1800s, the relationship between Americans and Native Americans became severely strained. Many Americans believed the western land was completely their own through the devastating concept of manifest destiny. Among the people carefully observing this issue were not just people who were supportive of forcefully taking Indian land, but also those who were opposed to it. This clashing conflict between the two groups intensified as their differences developed. Americans believed the Indians absolutely could not become assimilated and civilized instead than savage. Native Americans would no longer be idle and acquiesce to the treaties forced upon them, nor would they meekly accept the abuse. A notable supporter of Indian Removal…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical injustices, such as the unfair treatment American’s first nations received in the 19th century, could inform us about life in past societies on a great scale. The Indian Removal Act, which is prompted by President Andrew Jackson in 1829, is a bill that forced Native Americans who lived in the east of United States to settle in the Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River (Native Americans - Civilizing ), so there were free lands for the Europeans’ settlement. With the concern of people who didn’t want to leave their lands due to religious beliefs, thousand of soldiers entered the natives’ territory and forcibly relocated the natives in 1838. They hunted, imprisoned, raped and murdered native Americans. People who survived the onslaught were forced on a 1000 mile march to the established “Indian Territory”, many died on the way because the government didn’t supplied any food and resources.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A country that was based on equal treatment, tolerance for others, and fought for their own basic human rights, stripped the Native Americans of their own and degraded their culture. The Indian Removal act was genocide. It represented a time when Americans were hypocritical; while they demanded rights, they denied other races the same treatment. The legacy that was left behind from the Indian Removal act was one of destruction, there is nothing that justifies the disdain and selfishness behind the federal government’s approval of the act, or the support it received from the white…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, the American government produced the Fort Laramie treaty in 1851. In this, the government promised to give Indians 50 000$ a year for 10 years, if they didn’t attack the travellers going through their land. Fort Laramie treaty forced many tribes to share the same land. This was called the policy of concentration. However, these kinds of treaties turned to be against the interest of the American government, as tribes worked together. However, the peaceful ambiance did not maintain for so long, as inter-tribal clashes appeared again, especially after the discovery of gold between 1858 and 1862. Hence, the federal government found the reservation policy as the only choice but also the better solution for…

    • 3107 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Westward Expansion Effects

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the westward expansion of the united states caused a lot of disruption to the Native Americans. The Native Americans had all of the land in the U.S. for centuries, but when gold was found in the west, the whites wanted to travel west no matter what it took. This impacted the Native Americans in both positive and negative ways. The Native Americans had their land taken from them and adapted to the white culture as the Westward expansion was happening. Also, the Native Americans most reliable source for food and other materials was the buffalo. With the white settlers coming into their land, the buffalo would start to get scarce. The health and well being of the Native Americans was therefore hurt by westward expansion too. Westward expansion is where America grew, but the Indians fell.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Cherokee Removal

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The decision made by the Jackson administration to remove the Natives changed the social treatment towards the Natives from bad to worse, there was economic continuations of wanting to pursue a “peace policy” while taking the Natives land, and the political policies continued to try to “civilize”, assimilate, and/ or make peace with the Natives. The decision made by the Jackson administration to remove the Cherokee Indians to the land west of the Mississippi in the 1830’s did not affect the economic, and political continuations of policies; however, there were social changes pursued by the colonies and the United States towards the American Indian tribes.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cherokee Tribe History

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the early 1850’s the United States signed some treaties to reduce the tensions between them and the Indians. The treaty of Fort Laramie – with the Sioux, Cheyennes, Gros Ventres, and other tribes – allowed the United States to build posts and roads in the Central Plains. A second treaty at Fort Atkinson permitted them…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays