Preview

Individual Countries Do Not Have Right to Interfere with the Affairs of Another Countries

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Individual Countries Do Not Have Right to Interfere with the Affairs of Another Countries
Individual countries do not have right to interfere with the affairs of another countries.

Good relations among countries are essential to avoid conflicts and wars. Countries should not turn its back on each other and join to build common projects. However, some countries seem to prefer isolating from the rest of the world, harming often the well-being of their inhabitants. What should other countries do in such cases?

To begin with, each country has its own own cultural values and traditions which must obviously be respected. On the other hand powerful countries spread their ideas worldwide in different ways. Internet is clearly the main mean, and as a result, many countries are at risk of losing its identity, absorbed by the economic power of other countries with a culture probably poorer. The fact that 100 languages have disappeared from 2001 illustrates this point.

In addition to this, and in a very different form, some countries believe they have the right and the duty to defend the world from 'dangerous countries': communists, terrorists or which hide weapons of mass destruction. These individual countries interfere with the affairs of another country getting to the point of declaring war. History has many sad examples of this.

In contrast other countries that need international assistance do not receive it. Some African countries have been at civil war for years, and in some other their inhabitants live without respect of human rights. Organizations, like Amnesty International, claim this fact.

In today's world, it is incredible that individual countries interfere strongly with the affairs of another country, unless they only wanted to protect human rights using primarily information or education, never the war. In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that other types of harder actions in another country must be carried out with the agreement of the international community, and not being the individual decision of the government of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on…

    • 5678 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Each country has its own perspective on world order and not all meets eye to eye. But it can be argued that world order is a necessity in today’s society. There are many conflicts between majorities and minorities or nation against nation that can take many forms such as guerilla, military and nuclear warfare. An example of a military conflict was the Gulf war between Iraq and the UN lead forces concerning the occupation of Kuwait. But not all conflicts fit into the category of direct confrontation; some arise when a group ignores the needs of another or exploits them. For example after a long civil war in 1996 when the Taliban took control of Afghanistan. Many measures severely restricted women’s rights and alienated other Afghans. Due to an imbalance of economic power further conflicts can arise such as when a third world country cannot compete with developed nations because of the lack of capital they possess.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian Argument Outline

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Innocent civilians in Nations such as Liberia and Sierra Leone endured decades of war. Only after massive intervention by the international committee were these conflicts resolved. The same can be said for Libya and currently in DR. Congo.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The acceleration of globalization has raised issues culture conformity and diversity throughout the world. These topics are argued drastically throughout the world. Apparently, issues relate to cultures will not simply defined by right or wrong because each coins have two sides and every culture have their own advantages and drawbacks. True, many people may claim that globalization has made this world smaller and the distinctions between nations or cultures are disappearing. But personally, I hold positive opinions about the cultural developments nowadays.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Culture is very important in every country. It is the way a group of people live, talk and celebrate. People have always been identified by their cultures. Most of people leave their countries to go to another one and they usually adopt a new culture. The reasons of moving are lack of insecurity, education and economy. It is very sad when people leave their native countries and never came back. In order to pursue their dreams some of them have to travel around the world. These problems are everywhere in the world not only in poor but also in rich countries. Because of too many people in some countries, the insecurities are…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One country does not intervene with another county without probable cause. Usually, the reason for intervention falls back on the security of other countries. The Intervention in Haiti along with The Bay of Pigs Invasion both took place for this reason. The United States concluded the need to intervene and try and put and end to the madness. The chaos Haiti and Cuba faced all stemmed from an unfit leader and government. Because of this, the United States distrusted both Haiti and Cuba (Came, 1994, pp. 20+). “If we don’t end war, war will end us” (H. G. Wells, n.d.). Wars are capable of ending any form of civilization because of the casualties, damaged relationships, and economic deterioration. Because of historical events, governing powers…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    world order essay

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nation states play a significant role in the promotion and enforcement of World Order. The nation states, through compliance with international law and multilateralism retain a significant impact in the enforcement and maintenance of the idealistic notion of World Order, defined as the sole existence of global peace and stability and an absence of conflict. However, state sovereignty and a lack of political will can ultimately impede on the effective enforcement of World Order. Nonetheless, as highlighted by the international humanitarian intervention in March 2011, nation states play a pivotal role in achieving world order.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1990s raised the impetus of the international community to place the protection of civilians before state autonomy. However, given the complexity of international law and international relations, the threshold for triggering interventions continues to be debated.…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jus a bellum, the right to go to war, explicitly describes how a nation-state should conduct itself before preparing for war. There are seven sub-categories within Jus a bellum: Just Cause, Comparative Justice, Competent Authority, Right Intention, Profitability of Success, Last Resort, and Proportionality. Just Cause is explained as needing to have a reason to go to war. Not just for recapturing material possessions, but if lives are in danger. Comparative Justice is described, as the suffering and injustice on one side within a war must outweigh the suffering and injustice on the opposite side. Competent Authority must be in order within a war. Nation-states that start war must only start it if the authorities within the nation-state are focused on justice. Right Intention is defined as; force may be only used for a just cause correcting a suffered wrong. Gaining or maintaining economies by a nation-state is not considered just. Profitability of Success indicates that arms are not to be used where unbalanced measures are pertinent to be successful. The Last Resort category is presented as; force in war may only be used if peaceful alternatives have been completely depleted. The final category, Proportionality, is the foreseen benefits of starting war must be proportionate to its expected wrongs.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As interdependence is rising in today’s world, power is too. This implies that countries, usually not democratic, have more state sovereignty on their people and therefore are likely to have an army, which makes it increasingly difficult for other countries to intervene. Unfortunately nowadays the effectiveness of HI is underestimated when a conflict comes, as “universal rights” and state sovereignty come face to face, state sovereignty usually wins the confrontation. Economic power also affects the number of interventions. The Chinese government, for example, violates human rights in some parts of the countries, especially near the borders of Tibet, and no military intervention from other countries is planned because of China’s well known world’s…

    • 1556 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This behavior offers the question, if America should use its power or if the U.S. should better behave like other nations with a certain distance towards other countries’ problems.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    36% of Africans live on less than a dollar a day. 20% of the population is undernourished. However, people in foreign countries can help the poorer people by donating to trustworthy charities, and giving aid to the poor Africans who need it the most. Critics of aid say that giving aid to Africans creates stereotypes and doesn’t focus on creating a good economy of government. But it is more important to keep people alive than to create a good government and economy. You need able, healthy citizens to create a good workforce for a country, which is extremely difficult in Sub-Saharan Africa without foreign aid. Aid is needed in Africa because many people would die, it helps to get better death rates and accessible healthcare, and giving aid to keep people alive is more important that improving government.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    United Nations Vs Kant

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United Nations failure to prevent war is based on its flawed structure. This structure includes two different levels of power. The first part of that is the General Assembly. This allows each of the 139 nations the power to equally each have one vote. Because everyone has equal power, if used correctly, this should be every effective at preventing war. However, this is not possible because of the second part of United Nation, the Security Council. The Security Council is composed of two groups of nations who have the power to veto laws bought up in the General Assembly. These groups include permanent and non-permanent members. The permanent members of this are always China, France, Russian Federation, the…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Security is the fundamental goal of all states. Every state want to be secured and have no fears about another state taking over it. Security dilemma occurs when there is no trust between the states and each state will fear the other. States cannot depend or trust another one for obtaining its security because the intentions are never known, and we live in a self-helping world system. We are living in an anarchic world. There is no high authority over all the states. Every state will do what is better to survive in this self-help system world. To survive in this world, states need to…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays