Preview

Individual Rights vs. Public Order

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1608 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Individual Rights vs. Public Order
Individual Rights vs. Public Order Introduction
To understand individual rights and public order there must be an understanding on what the advantages and disadvantages are. Many individuals don’t understand the power these two topics hold. They are also at times misinterpreted; some don’t now what their rights are and some think they know. On occasion some may try to abuse them when public order is in forced for example when making an arrest an officer reads you your rights, some individuals think if your rights are not read to you they may not make an arrest. This is were they feel as though their individual rights have been violated. Many are confused as to what they mean, and is why their needs to be an understanding of what the advantages and disadvantages are. Along this paper it will be discussed and given a view of what they mean and a conclusion about the issues at hand.
Added to the constitution in 1791, the Bill of Rights limits power to the government, sort of like a protection of our individual rights. The first amendment protects our freedom of expression, speech, press, assembly and religion. Secondly our right to bear arms, third no quartering of troops with out consent. The fourth amendment, a very important individual right that make not be abused in law enforcement. This amendment protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. Protection of being forced to testify against us in a criminal trial is enforced in the Fifth Amendment. This also includes the double jeopardy law, stating that no one can be charged twice for the same crime (Rights of the People, 2008). Furthermore as the list goes on the eighth amendment is an individual right that is very important. This amendment protects us from any cruel and unusual punishment; something should be acknowledged and appreciated. In other countries they do believe in cruel and unusual punishment, depending on the crime, but it could be something as simple as theft. In America



References: Patriot Act. (2008). Retrieved Oct. 2008 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/patriotact/ Public Order Act. 2008 Retrieved October 25, 2008 from: http://www.publicorderact.com Schmalleger, F. (2007). Criminal justice today (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson – Prentice Hall. ISBN: 0131719505. Personal experiences of certain team members. (2008). Retrieved from the internet October, 2008: Rights of the People: Individual Freedom and the Bill of Rights, 2008 usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/rightsofindividuals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2009). Criminal Justice Today. An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, (10th ed.). : Pearson Education.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schmalleger, . (2014). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, 13th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf version].…

    • 766 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ucr vs Ncvs

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Criminal Justice Today(2006): an introductory text for the twenty-first century / Frank Schmrilleger.—9th ed. P.57-58…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual-rights advocate is someone who seeks to protect personal freedoms within the process of criminal justice. Their nature is to hold true what is written on the Constitution. A public-order advocate is someone who believes that under certain circumstances involving a criminal threat to public safety, the interests of society should take precedence over individual rights. Since September 11, 2001, many questions about individual rights versus public safety have arisen. The Patriot Act affects foreign travelers more than anyone, as it denies due process to a foreign visitor. This is unconstitutional as the American Government is supposed to grant due process to everyone. Law enforcement agencies must still obtain a warrant to conduct surveillance but probable cause is more lenient than in the past. Many people believe individual rights should be sacrificed for public safety but that is a dangerous move as if government is not forced to abide by the policies and procedures set by the constitution then government can become corrupt. Individual rights will trump public safety but you can still maintain a peaceful society without denying individuals their rights guaranteed under the constitution.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, Eleventh Edition, by Frank Schmalleger. Published by Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 18907 Words
    • 76 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When people are viewing the criminal justice system, they typically choose to look at the system in two ways. Some people think their individual rights are taken away in certain situations. These people are known as individual rights advocates. While others believe that for the sake of society, individual rights can be overruled. These people are known as public order advocates. These two beliefs conflict with each other because even though every person has individual rights, sometimes their rights are overlooked when thinking about public safety. Some people like the idea of public safety even if some of their rights are taken away. However, others feel violated when their rights are ignored, including in safety situations.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice Hall…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many laws and rights exist in the U.S.A. to keep people free and safe in this country. Individual rights exist to give people his or her freedoms, while that same freedom can allow people to take advantage of their freedoms. Freedom is the item that keeps the people of this country happy. People feel secure in what they are doing during their everyday lives. Public order is in place to keep society as a whole safe from misdeeds. Public order is also a system in place that restricts some freedoms that people may want. Freedoms are the ideals in life that everyone can take advantage of no matter who they are.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice Paper

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2009). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (10th ed.). Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content/eReader.aspx.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probation Officer Essay

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2013). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (12 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual V Public Order

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Individual rights and public order play a big part in everyday lives. For a state to have a functional society there needs to be a balance of both. When society cannot find an even balance between both of them, problem arises. Public order can violate individual rights and individual rights can put restrictions on public order. Individual rights play a huge part in our lives. Without individual’s rights, how can society function as a nation? Many positives derive from individual rights compare to the amount of negatives from these rights can be minimal. Public order plays a big part in how this nation functions. Public order keeps us safe from individuals, the nation safe from foreign beliefs, safe from terrorist, and keeps us safe from each other. The following paper will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of individual rights and public order. The history of why both public order and individual rights are needed to function as a democratic nation.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Justice System

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today. An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (11th ed.). Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content/eReader.aspx…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Courts

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Schmalleger F. (2009) Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, 10th edition…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law Enforcement Today

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal Justice Today (11th ed.). Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rights vs Public Order

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of individual rights vs. public order. It will define what the two terms are and discuss many of the elements that allow us to live in a society that has both. The research was done through the Internet and articles found through the University of Phoenix Library. The conclusions of the paper show that a free society cannot be solely based on individual rights or public order. Elements of each are balanced in a modern and complex society.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays