Preview

Individual Rights vs Public Order

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1295 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Individual Rights vs Public Order
Advantages and Disadvantages of Individual Rights vs. Public Order.

There are advantages and disadvantages to just about everything you can think of in this world. Two topics that can be very controversial to have an advantages and disadvantages discussion on are our individual rights and public order. We hold our individual rights very close to us and pride ourselves on the freedoms that these rights provide. We also see the devastation that can occur when the rights and freedoms we are given land in the hands of the wrong people. People that abuse their individual rights tend to disrupt public order and this is when we catch that glimpse and sometimes horror of one of the big disadvantages of individual rights verses public order. We are well aware of what individual rights are and how they apply to us, so we will come back to that, but what about public order? What exactly is that? Public order is in place to keep society as a whole safe from misdeeds. Public order is also a system in place that restricts some freedoms that people may want. Freedoms are the ideals in life that everyone can take advantage of no matter who they are. Public order is refraining from any acts of involvement that may lead to violence, which may be disrupting, while out in the public or any other acts or behaviors that may be illegal to do out in the streets. For instance, disruption in public order often times results in hindering someone else of their individual rights. Public order is considered to be disrupting the public in a way that may make being in the public unsafe. When violating public order, it is considered a crime, and can lead to jail time and or paying a fine if a conviction is obtained. However the real price to pay actually lands on the shoulders of society as our individual rights are infringed upon when public order is, well, not in order. As an American citizen you learn that you have individual rights and those rights come with having or



References: Bill of Rights; North East Digital Village; 2000-2009. http://nedv.net/village/billofrights/amendment1.php National Constitution Center, 2008

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    for eyesight, Lance Planck was found not to be in need of any service. Despite…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Civil Liberties are guarantees against or freedom from government interference in our personal lives. Civil liberties in the U.S. come from the Bill of Rights and some are in the body of the Constitution.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 4 Worksheet

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | A public offense done by violence, or a disturbance of public order or tranquility…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Objective 1: Understand the constitutional basis of civil liberties and the Supreme Court's role in defining them.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texas Political Culture

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages

    In the past, government had broke the people’s trust, and ever since then, laws were made to make sure the government doesn’t have so much power to where it can ruin us. These laws helped people have their say on what should happen in a certain state/country which helps us even today. Those laws are what gives us our individual rights…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual-rights advocate is someone who seeks to protect personal freedoms within the process of criminal justice. Their nature is to hold true what is written on the Constitution. A public-order advocate is someone who believes that under certain circumstances involving a criminal threat to public safety, the interests of society should take precedence over individual rights. Since September 11, 2001, many questions about individual rights versus public safety have arisen. The Patriot Act affects foreign travelers more than anyone, as it denies due process to a foreign visitor. This is unconstitutional as the American Government is supposed to grant due process to everyone. Law enforcement agencies must still obtain a warrant to conduct surveillance but probable cause is more lenient than in the past. Many people believe individual rights should be sacrificed for public safety but that is a dangerous move as if government is not forced to abide by the policies and procedures set by the constitution then government can become corrupt. Individual rights will trump public safety but you can still maintain a peaceful society without denying individuals their rights guaranteed under the constitution.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    are intended to insure that individuals walking on sidewalks, traveling on the streets, or enjoying the public parks and facilities are free from harassment, fear, threat, and alarm. This category of crime includes a large number of seemingly unrelated offenses that threaten the public peace, quiet, and tranquility. The challenge presented by these offenses is to balance public order and morals with the right of individuals to exercise their civil liberties. A prime example of a crime against public order is individual disorderly conduct. This broadly defined offense involves acts that create public inconvenience and annoyance by directly…

    • 4623 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    H. What mechanisms are in place to ensure that government does not violate our natural rights? Have these mechanisms worked? Why or why not?…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout United States history, various groups have faced discrimination. The federal and state governments have taken actions that have either protected or limited the rights of these groups in American society. Two examples of groups that faced discrimination are Native American Indians and Japanese Americans. In both cases, theses groups have had their natural rights violated and were forced to move from their homes.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was created and put into affect after the tragic events of September 11th, 2001. The law was intended to give United States Law Enforcement the ability to prevent future acts of terrorism on United States soil. These abilities allowed law enforcement retrieve private information on current United States citizens and foreign United States visitors without their knowledge and without a probable cause. After the event of September, 11th, the Act seemed probable for it’s main concern was simply to be used for the benefit of the citizens and the United States well-being.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Baltimore Riots

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A main purpose of government is to maintain social order. This is done by enforcing laws. If laws are not enforced properly, then people do what they want to. Evidence for this reasoning in…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminolgy

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Public order crime is a crime which involves acts that interfere with the operations of society and the ability of people to function efficiently. One example of a public order crime would be prostitution.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To illustrate, according to Des Moines Independent School District that took place in 1969, “John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt wore black armbands to school in Des Moines, Iowa, to protest the war in Vietnam. School officials told them to remove the armbands, and when they refused they were suspended… The Supreme Court sided with the students. Students and teachers don’t ‘shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,’” (Jacobs). This proves how the right to protest is at risk in our society because the students were simply protesting the war in Vietnam peacefully, but the school said they couldn’t when they were allowed to do so. Also, the right to protest is at risk, according to Edwards v. South Carolina, “petitioners, all of whom were black, organized a march to the South Carolina State House grounds… The march was peaceful, did not block pedestrian or vehicular traffic, and was conducted in an orderly fashion on public property; a group of approximately thirty police officers confronted the group and ordered its members to disperse or to submit to arrest… The Court held that the arrests and convictions violated the rights of the marchers” (Oyez). This shows how the right to protest is at risk in our society because as stated above, the protesters held a peaceful protest, which was completely legal, but were arrested for no reason which violated their rights to…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defending your constitutional rights, is what this country is about. Deeming an item of the United States Constitution unconstitutional may seem to many as an impossible task, however in this land of the free and home of the brave, we aim to make sure that whatever Constitutional stone the framers left unturned has been or will be adhered to and interpreted accordingly. Although a law may read the same on paper, the interpretation of that law may have different meanings (broad or narrow) depending on the particulars of the situation. Despite the misconceptions people may feel are incorporated into the U.S. Constitution or the framers’ intent, judicially the Supreme Court will always be the deciding entity; which is the dilemma in the case…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays