There are many theories as to what motivates adolescents to commits crimes. There are many theories as to why other adolescents in the similar circumstances are not motivated to break the law. Everyone is different, and everyone has their own reasons for their actions. Some say it is situational, and others say it is biological. Personally, I feel it is a bit of both, children are easily influenced and their surroundings are sure to affect them in some way, whether it be good or bad. There are also biological circumstances that have an influence on them as well, and when you mix situational and biological influences in the mind of an adolescent the results can either be disastrous or excellent.
There are many theories out there that try to explain why children do the things they do, but I do not feel there will ever be a full understanding of the actions people take. I also feel that one person can have the trait of more than one of these theories all at the same time. I will be going over two of the many theories in this paper. First, there is General Deterrence, which tries to stop people from offending by showing them what will happen to them if they commit the same crimes as others. According to "Deterrence Theory" (n.d.), “General deterrence is designed to prevent crime in the general population. Thus, the state’s punishment of offenders serves as an example for others in the general population who have not yet participated in criminal events.” (General and Specific Deterrence). One example of this is the death penalty, it is used as a punishment for horrible and violent crimes like capital murder. The use of the electric chair or lethal injection are pointed out to potential offenders, in an attempt to stop them from offending. This theory still works somewhat, making children afraid to commit crimes, because they are afraid of the punishments, however, it does not work as well as it used too. There are still some children out there that see this as a good enough reason not to break the law, but there are many more that general deterrence has no influence on. Most of these children see going to prison or death row as a part of life, and some children grow up being taught that being a criminal is the way their life should be.
The second theory I will discuss is the Genetic theory. This theory is based on the inheritance of criminal behavior from parent to child. This subject is quite controversial, many studies have been conducted based on this theory, but the question still remains, can criminal behavior be genetically transferred from parent to children? Wilson (2011), “Crime is encouraged or discouraged by external forces rather than internal genetically dictated factors.” (para. 2). There are many different beliefs on the subject of genetics in the criminal justice field, but I do not think there will ever be a 100% accurate answer to the question of whether or not genetics truly play a role in criminal behavior. It is my belief that the environment a person grows up in, as well as their person temperament play the biggest role in a criminal offender’s decision making process.
There are numerous possible reasons why people do the things they do, but I do not think there will ever be one right answer for everybody. Some people offend out of necessity, and others out of desire. There are many people that think it is a part of life because they grew up seeing it done by others, and there are some that grow up in the same environment that lead a full and healthy life style. As I stated before, it all depends on each individual and the way they think as a person.
References
Deterrence Theory. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://marisluste.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/deterrence-theory.pdf
Wilson, J.W. (2011). Debating Genetics as a Predictor of Criminal Offending and Sentencing. Retrieved from http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/593/2/debating-genetics-as-a-predictor-of-criminal-offending-and-sentencing
References: Deterrence Theory. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://marisluste.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/deterrence-theory.pdf Wilson, J.W. (2011). Debating Genetics as a Predictor of Criminal Offending and Sentencing. Retrieved from http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/593/2/debating-genetics-as-a-predictor-of-criminal-offending-and-sentencing
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A twelve year old murdering a six year old, a 16 year old robbing a convenience store, and even a young student shooting his teacher cold blood, all of these are cases in which young children have done heinous crimes and have been put away for most of their life. These children are taking away from society for years in order to protect the common good but this type of situation may be detrimental to the individual. Many studies have suggested that at a young age, children respond with the phrase “I do not know” to many of the questions posed to them because they honestly do not know why they did that or said that. Even though removing them for the common good to insure the protection of others, this type of punishment is destroying the next generation.…
- 1481 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Does the Perceived Risk of Punishment Deter Criminally Prone Individuals? Rational Choice, Self-Control, and Crime…
- 14339 Words
- 58 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this time period, an American named Richard Dugdale conducted a type of experiment in which he spent time in a jail where several inmates are from the same family. In Dugdale’s study, he revealed that there is a notable amount of criminality and drunkenness among the family members. He then furthers the idea that through genetics and inheritance, criminal traits could be passed down.…
- 2156 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Wichliffe, J. A. (2000). Why Juveniles Commit Crimes. Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute Volume II .…
- 1888 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Now studies show people’s overall genetic composition in combination with social influences account for variation in criminality…
- 1225 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One thing that correlates to the crimes is child maltreatment. When they child is not taken care of they tend to veer off and find other means of living and making ends meet. Another variable is alcoholism and drug use. A parent or parents is a child’s biggest role model and so are their siblings and any other older siblings. If a child grows up always seeing nothing but alcohol around the house and their family getting high off of pills and smoking than they are naturally going to take that lifestyle in and think that it is normal and okay and they will think that everyone else around them lives the same lifestyle. Bullying has in my world been a major variable. Whens someone is bullied they think that they need to find their own happy place and they claim that committing crimes does that for them. For example when a person gets in a fight or steals something and all the attention is turned on them, that is the highlight of their lives because everyone always bullied them. Single or no parent homes is probably one of the biggest variables. Like I mentioned before a parent or parents are a child’s biggest role models. A child’s mind is like a sponge and they always play the game of monkey see monkey do. This will never go away even when they are all grown up and moved out. I was a child that was in a single family home and there was nothing I would of ever…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
example of this type of behavior is school yard bullying. It is said that 37 percent of…
- 742 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are several reasons why juveniles commit crimes and act up. Some of these can be explained by theories or in other words educated guesses. Although theories are only educated guesses they can be used to decide why juvenile delinquents come through the court systems. Theories can be helpful in determining why children or teenagers become a criminal. It also helps to determine what can help deter crimes by juveniles. In this essay theories will be explained that could fit some of the children in the following case studies.…
- 997 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A child learns when they are young from those around them. They don't automatically know what the right actions to take when facing a problem. If someone is growing up just seeing nothing but violence around them, they grow up to see that as something normal. They end up viewing it as something okay to do in their life. Many idolize and look up to those around there life. If a delinquent is nice and looks after a kid, then that kid will want to grow up and become that way. To their eyes it's the best person ever and they wish to become like them.…
- 1120 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Gibbs, J. (1975). Deterrence, Types of Deterrence, and Crime Rates. In Crime, Punishment and Deterrence (pp. 29-56). New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc.…
- 5887 Words
- 24 Pages
Better Essays -
There are a number of different theories that debate whether a young person exercises choice in committing crime or whether they are forced or constrained by other factors, to act in socially unacceptable ways. The following essay will examine a variation of individual, situational and structural theories that attempt to understand why young people may be drawn to criminality. These theories have an assortment of views on the matter and explore several factors that can contribute to juvenile crime.…
- 2631 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
To begin with, numerous reasons for why a child acts in the manner he exhibits and why he continues to exert such dangerous and even fatal schemes. Recent research shows that factors ranging from inherited personality traits to chemical imbalances and damages suffered in the womb can increase the odds that a child will become violent (Johnson 234). Experts argue that no one is predestined to a life of crime. They believe that influences such as repeated abuse, extreme neglect, poverty, media violence, and easy access to guns play the major role in molding children into criminals. The father of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer wonders, "If potential for evil is in the blood that some of us pass on to our children" (Wartik 23).…
- 2014 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this exercise, you will define and discuss the concepts of Learning and Theory. Please save this document and type directly on this worksheet. Every response should be substantive and requires a minimum of 3 to 5 complete sentences per response.…
- 539 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In a teenage brain, they are not fully formed yet. Teens do not understand the fundamental differences between good and bad (Steinberg). Young teens were given intelligence test and hypothetical legal questions and situations. Studies show one-third of those eleven to thirteen and one-fifth of those fourteen or fifteen could not understand the process (John D. and MacArthur). Many of these teens who commit these violent crimes are not being taught right from wrong by their parents. Teaching your kids right to bad at a young age will help influence them to be a better person. It’s easier to teach young kids from good and bad than when they are adults because their brain is still collecting information. Experts conclude rehabilitation works better for juveniles than for adult offenders (Ash). Teens reasoning and judgment are still developing until their mid-twenties (Steinberg). For the most part, teens are incapable of making wise and good choices all the time. Teens are given pressure all the time from school and their peers and it mixes with their immaturity. Teenage is a stage when an individual is developing and learning through exploration. When teens start to listen to their friends more than their family members they tend to find themselves in bad situations. Teenagers want to fit in with their group of friends to have the feeling of being accepted.…
- 867 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Appelbaum, P. S., (2005). Behavioral Genetics and the Punishment of Crime. Law and Psychiatry, 56 (1), 25-27.…
- 1457 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays