Since the adoption of Christianity by Vladimir I in 988 A.D. the church has had a profound influence on the Russian state. The magnitude of this influence has varied throughout history, from its peak during the 15th Century, to lows during the reign of Peter the Great and in Soviet Russia.
Since the fall of communism the Church has revived its position in Russian Society and is asserting its influence in a number of ways, including resurgence in attendance, the building and restoration of churches, and arguably in the re-appearance of the Church and State acting in symphony.
Prior to 988 A.D.
Prior to the adoption of Christianity, paganism prospered in 10th century eastern Slavic areas, including modern day Ukraine and Western Russia. This pagan worship was specific to each tribe and community resulting in a lack of unity between tribes and communities. In 980 AD, Vladimir I the Prince of Kiev, recognised the need to bring these pagan tribes together under a common ‘single state’ religion. He initially attempted this through the unification of common pagan gods, however this didn’t succeed.[1] Fortuitously at this time, the conditions for the adoption of the Christian religion were appropriate, including the spread of Eastern (Byzantine) Christianity along the Black Sea and other nearby areas. It was this religion that Vladimir I chose to unite Rus and which, subsequently created the nation of Rus out of the chaos of barbarian tribes.[2]
Arguably, Vladimir I chose this religion, for a number of reasons. Most notably were the aesthetic qualities of the religion, including the beauty of the service and the churches themselves that finally determine the adoption of this religion.[3] These qualities subsequently had influence throughout Russian history in architecture, the arts, culture and notably in all Russian’s lives. Of a major importance to the survival of ‘Rus’ the church also ensured survival through the Mogol years and persecutions such as during the reign of Peter the Great.
988 A.D. The Adoption of Orthodox Christianity
In the year 988 AD Vladimir I was baptised and declared Christianity as the official state religion of ‘Rus’ (then Kievian Rus).[4] In the immediate aftermath of the adoption of Christianity, the deities of the old religion were destroyed, mass baptisms took place, churches were built and priests were appointed in all towns. The immediate impact of this conversion to Christianity also saw children of the Kievian upper class educated and taught to read.
The Church and its influence upon the Russian State
The Mongol invasion
In the middle of the 13th century, during the period of Mogol conquests, the Russian Orthodox church saved the population from destruction by the Mongol invaders, the Tartars. The Tatar’s were pagans who fortunately believed in the existence of more than one god. Accordingly, they recognised the church’s saints and the church, just-in-case they were the one true god, thereby granting them forbearance and support instead of destruction.[5]
During this period, the church also gave spiritual strength to the nation of Russia to survive and fight off the enemies[6] and was one defining factor in Russia finally overcoming the Tatars, under the leadership of Ivan the Terrible.
The middle history
Throughout its middle history the Russian church became more submissive to the will of the state. Submission was evidenced as early as the 14th century, and complete in the 18th and 19th century with the decree of Peter the Great. However, this submissive relationship went from one end of the spectrum to the other, with the church also evidencing an assertive relationship over the state, such as in 1662 when Patriarch Nikon claimed that the church is superior to the secular power.[7]
In the 1441, the church evidenced a tendency to obey the will of the state, by following the will of the Moscow princes and not the head of the Church. They evidenced this in the case of the rejection of unification with the Catholic Church. However, the influence of the state over the church was also reinforced during this period by the Tartars, possibly recognising the power of religious leaders, but mainly because Moscow princes were more likely to obedient to the will of the Tatar rulers; the Khan’s.[8] However, as time continued, the influence of the church increased.
Symphonia
The church played a leading role in freeing the land from the Tatars, and centering power under the princes of Moscow. As Moscow gained political power in Eastern Europe, the significance of the church increased throughout the religious world. In the fifteenth century this led to the creation of a self-governing arm of the church in Moscow, lead by the Metropolitan of Moscow and all Russia, who was ranked among the highest of Byzantine churches. This increased the influence of the church on the state, and through the principal of ‘Symphonia’ which aimed for a balance between the government of one hand and the church on the other, the church ultimately became one of the controlling powers; the Czar being the other.
Through this linkage, the church played an important role in how the country was run. It was generally accepted by the population that the royal decrees and edicts of the Czar’s were primarily religious in character. This linkage continued until the decree rescinding the patriarchate in 1721 by Peter I (Peter the Great), who decreed that the whole of Russia was under one supreme ruler, the Czar.[9]
Peter the Great
When Czar Peter I abolished the patriarchate he entrusted the Government of the church to a Synod under his control, thereby making it a department of the State, and reducing its influence.[10] This act essentially abolished the long held belief of Symphonia, although the reforms took place slowly and many failed to filter through to peasant areas. Arguably, the principal of Symphonia has re-emerged in modern day Russia following the fall of the Soviet Union.[11]
However, the influence of the church did not wholly dissipate with the rescinding the patriarchate. Throughout the next 200 years the church maintained its relevance through attention to religious education and missions throughout Russia, restoration and building of churches, and developing sciences such as history, linguistics and Oriental studies.[12]
The Old Believers
The Russian state and culture was particularly influenced by the Old Believers, a group of Christians who advocated that nothing be altered in Russian texts, service of ritual.[13] In the 17th century, their views led to personal persecution, imprisonment and exile and ultimately resulted in the distribution of the Old Belief through Siberia, the North and the Urals; thereby helping to further populate these areas.
The religious beliefs of the Old Believers, which included high ethical standards, love of work and reliability, led to them attaining high positions in business and prospering the Russian economy. Ultimately, their beliefs and practices resulted in innovative industrial technology, famous art works, superior performing art practices, and benefits to charities.[14]
From Peter the Great to the Soviet Years
In the 19th century the church held a higher position than under Peter the Great, however the continuing functioning of the church as a department of the State excluding their ability to exercise any influence or relative power in the State. It wasn’t until 1917, with the abdication of Czar Nicolas II that the church found independence for the first time in history. However this independence was to have disastrous consequences in the Soviet years.
The Soviet years: 1917 to 1980’s
The Soviet years, beginning in 1917, was to be the start of turmoil for the Russian church, and signalled the decline of the influence it had shown for almost 1000 years. With the abdication of Nicholas II the church obtained independence through a scission of Church and State. However, the Church was able to establish the Patriarchate for the first time since Peter I. However this scission accompanied the Bolshevik’s anti-religious stance, with elimination of religion as an ideological objective.
Subsequently, churches were destroyed, clergy and believers persecuted or killed and publications banned. Apart from a short revival during the Second World War, the number of churches and church influence were minimal.[15]
Current influence in Russia
The Millennium celebrations of the baptism in Kievan Rus in 1988, compelled the powers of Russia to open fresh dialogue with the church, based on the importance it played in the history of Russia and its contribution to the moral standards of the country.[16] Post-Soviet recovery has been mixed and the church continues to maintain a new found independence from the State.[17] However, some argue that the Church is still able to influence the State, eg. in the banning of some non-Russian Orthodox organisations, including Scientology and Jehovah’s Witnesses.[18]
The historical stand made by the church is well recognised by the Government and its politicians. It has been argued that when politicians are asked why the church is given so much prominence, it is a case of ‘repaying the States historical debt to the Church’.[19]
Conclusion
Throughout its history the Church has significantly influenced the Russian State. From the adoption of Christianity to the reign of Peter the Great, the idea of Symphonia has underscored the Church and State relationship. In addition, the Church was able to influence the creation of the Russian State, both initially, during and following the period of the Tartar rule.
The influence of the Church commenced its decline during the reign of Peter the Great, where it was relegated to a department of the State. This influence abated during the Soviet years except for a small resurgence during World War II.
Since the fall of communism the Church has evidenced a reviving influence over the Russian State, although not as strong as what it was during its zenith in the 15th and 16th Century.
References:
Blitt, Richard. (2010). Russia’s ‘orthodox’ foreign policy: the growing influence of the Russian Orthodox church in shaping Russia’s policies abroad, Religion in the Public Square, retrieved from < https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/142-blittboyd33upajintll3632011pdf> on April 1, 2013.
Fedotov, George P. (1943). Religious Background of Russian Culture. Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 12, pp 3551 doi:10.2307/3160216
Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 122-130.
Papkova, Irina. (2010) The Orthodox Church and Russian Politics, Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Oxford University Press.
Petro, Nicolai N. (2012). The role of the Orthodox Church in changing Russia, Instituto Per Gli Studi Di Politica Internazionale, No. 121, p. 1-6.
Richards, George. (1918). The Church and religion of Russia, The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 541-561.
Rzhevsky, Nicholas. (1999) The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press.Cambridge Companions Online http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521472180
Rzhevsky, Nicholas. (2012) The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. (2nd Edition) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Companions Online http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9781107002524
-----------------------
[1] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 38.
[2] Fedotov, G. (1943). Religious Background of Russian Culture. Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 12, pp 3551:41.
[3] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 40.
[4] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 24.
[5] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 42.
[6] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 126.
[7] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 127.
[8] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 43.
[9] History of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2007, Russian Crafts, retrieved from < http://russian-crafts.com/customs/russian-church-history.html> on 31 March 2013.
[10] Richards, G.W. (1918). The Church and religion of Russia, The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 548.
[11] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 126.
[12] History of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2007, Russian Crafts, retrieved from < http://russian-crafts.com/customs/russian-church-history.html> on 31 March 2013.
[13] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 44.
[14] Richards, G.W. (1918). The Church and religion of Russia, The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 552.
[15] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 127.
[16] History of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2007, Russian Crafts, retrieved from < http://russian-crafts.com/customs/russian-church-history.html> on 31 March 2013.
[17] Charles Clover (December 5, 2008). "Russia 's church mourns patriarch". Financial Times. Retrieved March 31, 2013.
[18] Blitt, R.C. 2010. Russia’s ‘orthodox’ foreign policy: the growing influence of the Russian Orthodox church in shaping Russia’s policies abroad, Religion in the Public Square, retrieved from < https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/142-blittboyd33upajintll3632011pdf> on April 1, 2013.
[19] Petro, Nicolai N. (2012). The role of the Orthodox Church in changing Russia, Instituto Per Gli Studi Di Politica Internazionale, No. 121, p. 2.
References: Fedotov, George P. (1943). Religious Background of Russian Culture. Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 12, pp 3551 doi:10.2307/3160216 Gaskova, M Papkova, Irina. (2010) The Orthodox Church and Russian Politics, Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Oxford University Press. Petro, Nicolai N. (2012). The role of the Orthodox Church in changing Russia, Instituto Per Gli Studi Di Politica Internazionale, No. 121, p. 1-6. Richards, George. (1918). The Church and religion of Russia, The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 541-561. Rzhevsky, Nicholas. (1999) The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press.Cambridge Companions Online http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521472180 Rzhevsky, Nicholas [2] Fedotov, G. (1943). Religious Background of Russian Culture. Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 12, pp 3551:41. [3] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 40. [4] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 24. [5] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 42. [6] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 126. [7] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 127. [8] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 43. [9] History of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2007, Russian Crafts, retrieved from < http://russian-crafts.com/customs/russian-church-history.html> on 31 March 2013. [10] Richards, G.W. (1918). The Church and religion of Russia, The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 548. [11] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 126. [12] History of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2007, Russian Crafts, retrieved from < http://russian-crafts.com/customs/russian-church-history.html> on 31 March 2013. [13] Rzhevsky, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 44. [14] Richards, G.W. (1918). The Church and religion of Russia, The American Journal of Theology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 552. [15] Gaskova, M. (2004). The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, No. 7, p. 127. [16] History of the Russian Orthodox Church, 2007, Russian Crafts, retrieved from < http://russian-crafts.com/customs/russian-church-history.html> on 31 March 2013. [17] Charles Clover (December 5, 2008). "Russia 's church mourns patriarch". Financial Times. Retrieved March 31, 2013. [19] Petro, Nicolai N. (2012). The role of the Orthodox Church in changing Russia, Instituto Per Gli Studi Di Politica Internazionale, No. 121, p. 2.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
* The Orthodox Church followed this path as well and made Moscow the bureaucratic center of the Russian Orthodox Church…
- 1699 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The reason why most of the important sources from this book are private diaries written by Soviet kids during the 1970s is because it gives the readers an opportunity to compare personal thoughts of young people of western cultural products from diaries. In this way it recreates a real social history of the Brezhnev era.…
- 1292 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Paganism was a mental mindset of the Eastern Slavs living in a world where a majority of the European countries surrounding them had already converted to a monastic religion. Vladimir I, a great prince of Kiev, reigned from 980 till 1015 and succeeded in the mass conversion of the Eastern Slavs.1 Throughout his reign Vladimir’s agenda had always been to strengthen his empire, in order to be considered valuable among the dominate nations of the European family.2 The traditional view of Vladimir’s motivation for the conversion is that only after considering all monastic faiths, did he finally reach the decision of Eastern Christianity, based on the beauty and wonder of Constantinople.3 The conversion of Kievan Rus not only led to a change in religion but also a variety of other benefits, which suggests Vladimir was motivated not only by aesthetic reasons, but also political and economic reasons too. The choice of Eastern Christianity had a profound and lasting effect of the Eastern Slav’s all over Kievan Rus. The gateway opened by Vladimir and Eastern Christianity allowed the country and its people to expand in various areas of art, architecture and education. These areas of culture effected and shaped the events in the history of Russia that followed.…
- 1742 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Russian culture was influenced through the adaption of other cultures such as the Greeks and Romans that the Byzantine’s adapted. The religion was influenced through the spread of Eastern Orthodox Christianity which was created in the Byzantine Empire due to its conflict between the use of icons to illustrate famous stories. The government was influenced by Justinian’s Code which was created to organize the Roman set of laws, the government structure of the Byzantine empire in which is ruled by a monarchy, and its political issues such as foreign invasions from neighboring societies. Although, Russia has numerous qualities that are similar to the Byzantine empire, the establishment has a unique qualities of its own such as being compiled of several ethnic groups such as the Western Slavs, who lived in the marshlands, plains, mountains of east-central-europe. Their cultural ties are with western Europe and their religious ties are with the Roman Catholic Church. Their descendants are the Polish, Czech Slovakian, and the Slovaks. Another group is the South Slavs which are settled in the balkan peninsula. Their descendants are the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, whose language and cultures were both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox. The Last group…
- 998 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stretched from Europe to the Pacific Ocean and included people with diverse cultures and traditions.2 Russia was a land of disparity and contradiction by the turn of the 20th century. It was caught in between two worlds: the traditional world of the peasantry and the modern world of the westernized elite.3 As these two world coexisted, their values, culture, and way of life extremely differed. Regardless of the persistence of a rural society and economy, Russia became exposed to profound urban and industrial growth during the second half of the 19th century. 4Many peasants surfed…
- 2030 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
Religion has affected society both positively and negatively throughout life. Most religions promote and educate individuals in social virtues; how to choose right over wrong regardless of personal desire (Fisher, 2005). Many charities feed, cloth, and shelter the homeless all in the name of their God and acting on their faith. Unfortunately, while organized religion promotes faith in positive social virtues it also can instill fear and oppress its follower at times. The followers who see the founder of a religion to be extraordinary or supernatural could be mislead by a dishonest and unethical leader (Fisher, 2005).…
- 328 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The conversion of the Kievan people to the Christianity took place when the rivalry between Constantinople and Rome on converting pagan peoples in the northern Europe reached its peak in the tenth century. Although the breakup of two churches happened in 1054, the Russian allegiance to Byzantium helped to determine much of the subsequent history of the country. The Prince of Kiev, Saint Vladimir Svyatoslavich, the baptizer of the Russians, adopted the Christianity in 988 according to the Primary Chronicle. This decision by Prince Vladimir was the result of a process of heightened activity by missionary monks and priests from Byzantium among the Slavs as well as increased military,…
- 1140 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Lermontov, Mikhail I︠U︡rʹevich, Vladimir Vladimirovich Nabokov, and Dmitri Nabokov. A Hero of Our Time. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1958. Print.…
- 1397 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Tolstoy’s “After the Dance” is essentially a representation of Russian history and the exposition of a dark side to the seemingly regal atmosphere of the Russian aristocracy first introduced at the ball. Using literary elements such as symbolism and foreshadowing to reveal a hidden meaning, Tolstoy tells the story of Ivan Vasilievich’s first impression of the beautiful Varinka and how this impression changes after watching her father cruelly beat a Tartar for attempting to desert.…
- 551 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Bobok by Fyodor Dostoevsky is a witty anecdote that satirizes the extent in which human depravity exists and thus makes a social commentary on the futile and foolish nature of Russian Utopianism and assigns moral revival as the call for real change.…
- 1311 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
On March 15, 2012, I landed in Vladivostok, Russia. I was amazed by the diversity and fast growth of the city since my last visit in 2006. Everything has changed the population has quickly grown, and people from around the world are visiting this place that is economically expanding. I seen family, friends, and professionals, which all knew my academic intentions. I talked a lot about social work and counseling, and more specifically: what would they do in times of crisis? Would they seek help? Where? I interviewed a few people in different generational categories, and they all had the same thing to say, for some odd reason; grab a bottle, head over to your best friends house, that is our therapy session! Therefore my questions all sprouted from one underdeveloped and not heavily researched topic: the role of psychotherapy/counseling in Russia.…
- 1526 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Eugene Oneguine, the chief poetical work of Russia's greatest poet, having been translated into all the principal languages of Europe except our own, I hope that this version may prove an acceptable contribution to literature. Tastes are various in matters of poetry, but the present work possesses a more solid claim to attention in the series of faithful pictures it offers of Russian life and manners. If these be compared with Mr. Wallace's book on Russia, it will be seen that social life in that empire still preserves many…
- 39448 Words
- 158 Pages
Good Essays -
Glenny, Michael. “Existential Thought in Bulgakov 's The Master and Margarita.” Canadian-American Slavic Studies 15.2-3 (Summer-Fall 1981): p238-249. Print.…
- 2153 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Biography of Pushkin at the Russian Literary Institute “Pushkin House” retrieved on January 7, 2015…
- 1836 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In Central Asia, before World War II, Tajik literature occupied the high literary plane; after the war, that position was ceded to Kyrgyz prose fiction, spearheaded by the untiring efforts of Chingiz Torekulovich Aitmatov. Aitmatov provides a noteworthy account of his own life and career in his "Craftsmanship."1 He was born on December 12, 1928, to the family of Torekul and Nagima Aitmatov in the village of Sheker (Talas Valley, Kirov district). Village tradition required that he should know seven generations of his ancestors. And he knew every single one; he knew what each had accomplished and how he or she was perceived by the community.2 The Aitmatov family was closely knit. Chingiz Aitmatov's paternal grandmother was his closest friend as well. To teach him about Kyrgyz culture, she took the boy to traditional jailus (field festivities), weddings, and funeral repasts (osh).3 Aitmatov also accompanied her to meetings with storytellers, bards, and akin singers. Today, he draws regularly on those rare experiences as his writing weaves a masterful tapestry of Kyrgyz traditions and legends embellished by new Soviet colors. His family's attempts to rise above poverty had been unsuccessful; bai-feudal tyrants, unpredictable political turns, and bad luck having been the culprits. Aitmatov's father, Torekul Aitmatov (1903-1937) was born into a middle class peasant family on the bank of the Kurkureu River. He graduated from high school (gymnasium) in 1917 and was elected secretary of the Committee of the Poor in 1920. Between 1924, when he joined the Bolshevik Party, and 1935, when he was sent to Moscow to study at the Institute of Red Professorship, he worked in a number of positions in the Party apparatus. In 1937, Aitmatov senior, one of the first Kyrgyz communists, a well-versed literary figure and a politician, is liquidated on charges of "bourgeois nationalism."4…
- 1364 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays