Preview

Influence Of War Tactics During World War I

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Influence Of War Tactics During World War I
Thought history we have seen many different tactics used. Some might include the iconic Phalanx of the Romans. Others might make a point of America’s ambushes in the revolutionary war. As time went on we saw a drastic improvement of artillery along with tactics being used by many countries. With the arrival of the first world war all countries had to come up with different war tactics that would further their success. Some of the many tactics used included snipers as well as tank attacks.

The tactics in using snipers and tanks were similar in the way that they were both very methodical weapons. Whenever a country would use these weapons they had to do precise planning in order to execute the perfect attack. You couldn’t just go
…show more content…
British officer John Fuller had the duty of deploying the tanks. He used an extremely methodical tactic. It was that his army would wait for the terrain to be just right then they would attack the enemy with tanks along with other firearm. Snipers are quite similar to this because you have to be cautious of where you place them and when you use them. The Germans took it upon themselves to be methodical in their approach to the attack. Much like the tanks they had to wait till everything was just right then they would attack. The Germans would set up the snipers at dawn then wait all-day until the British soldiers came. When the British came the Germans would fly a kite with English writing on it and whoever dared to read it was shot in the head. Another way that these tactics were similar is that they were both used for big attacks. Whenever a country would implement these tactics they would have to do planning way ahead of time. Snipers and tanks weren’t just used on a regular basis. They were used for special attacks that had been planned ahead of time. Using these tactics was not the same …show more content…
One Difference is that these tactics were used by different countries. The tactic of the sniper attacks were used by the Germans and the tactic of the Tank Attacks were used by the British. Oddly enough Both Britain and German were enemies in WWI and used these tactics on occasion against each other. Another Difference is that these tactics were implemented in different times. In 1914 (start of WWI) the Germans were the first country to implement Sniper attack tactics. As I mentioned they used this in a way that would revolutionize the way we use Snipers in the war. The tank attacks on the other hand weren’t used the the war until 1916. The main reason for this is because they hadn’t been invented yet. The British army were the first to implement the tank attack. It was quite literarily the most powerful ground force for the time. No one head seen such a massive machine that could move in such a way. Despite this both tactics worked for both countries extremely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Such as the ‘Battle of Britain’ that was the German offensive to overrun British defences to allow for the occupation of Britain after the fall of another great nation, France. The fall of France was one that has been seen to be a triumphal example of German tactics of Blitzkrieg. ‘By Blitzkrieg we mean concentrated employment of armour and air forces to confuse the enemy with surprise and speed… the objective is to defeat the enemy quickly in a decision-making operation.’ This tactics was the use of two effective technology developments and the change of tactics from the First World War. The tank, first used in World War One to cross the trenches, ‘The trench deadlock of World War One was a nightmare scenario for the German Army’ Lessons were learnt from the stalemate battles that occurred through WW1. Technology allowed for tanks to go through development to make them faster, more agile and increasingly effective, removing the need for trench tactics. The incorporation of a tactic such as the ‘lightning war’ saw the German Luftwaffe and Wehrmacht gain large areas of land quickly and…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We must know more about our past, so we will not make the same mistakes in the future. The tactics between these two battles in different time periods, centuries apart, are mimicked. These two battles are over two centuries apart and share a common similarity that less than 1% of the human population know about: double envelopment. Firstly, what even is double…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Allied Leadership was effective during the First World War because of their great use of technology. The Allies applied both advances and standard technology in their defences, offences and their airborne methods. Many defences that the Allies used were first to use barbed wire to slow down the on-coming enemy and to have tranches so that it would be more difficult for the opponents to target them. Since the barbed wire would have slowed down the Germans and the Austria-Hungarians, the use of the machine gun was crucial to gun down the advancers before they could reach their destination. The use of mortars was also very effective to bombard the enemy’s trenches and to minimize their troop capacity. The Allies used multiple offences during their offences. Many defensive weapons could also be used to attack such as the trenches to provide shelter, the mortars to bomb the opponents’ trenches and machine guns to provide cover for the…

    • 1252 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet the effectiveness of the machine gun made up in a sense for the limited training. It dehumanized and the fact that 1300 rounds could be fired off within a minute it was more or less the act of pulling the trigger and not letting go towards the direction of the enemy. Since the French and the Germans were at a stalemate, they knew that the only way to protect themselves from the enemy was to dig, leading to trench warfare (Keegan, 258). The trench warfare became a game of sending men across no-man’s land in order to gain some leverage over the enemy. Conditions in the trenches was revolting with bodies of dead men and feces creating the perfect condition for disease, as well as trench foot caused by prolonged exposure of the feet to damp, unsanitary, and cold…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both units were made up of infantry, so they also had a lot of problems with tanks, which they were inadequately equipped to…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Allied tactics involved holding out for enemy forces to run out of fuel and moral, utilizing tough terrain to hinder the enemy’s advancement towards objectives, and initiating counterattacks when the weather permitted the use of airstrikes or supply drops from Allied forces. Enemy forces that depend heavily on fuel and pushing forward into friendly supply lines to capture fuel supplies intact are engaged in a tactic that was used by Nazi forces. When Nazi’s were unable to take supply lines intact their mechanized forces ability to advance could only move one third of the distance to the objective without a proper resupply. If captured supplies are sabotaged or destroyed to deny enemy forces access to a quick resupply, they are entrenched in a weaker position from their offensive maneuver. Also, roads and terrain were too muddy or icy for Panzer units to advance on Allied forces adding more problems for them to push forward on Allied defense positions.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Americans used many tactics during the Vietnam War in an attempt to combat and defeat the Viet Cong and NLF fighters. These tactics included strategic hamlets, napalm, search and destroy and defoliants as well as several others. Some of these tactics were viewed as successful for combating the VC but others were not as most were not effective against guerrilla tactics. The first tactic used by the US to try and stop VC support was strategic hamlets.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One tactic that was used was trench warfare. The soldiers would stand in the ground with high walls for protection. This provided shelter from gunfire. These walls were tall enough so everyone could stand behind them. One of the downsides to trench warfare was “trench foot.” This would occur when the soldiers stood in inches of water for days on end. It was a nasty infection that would get them sent to the infirmary and take them out of battle for an extended period of time. Not only did the infection affect how much time they got to fight it was also very painful.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It was the key to the offensive movement for the British to advance and destroy the Germans. Within the eight days of raining artillery steel, the British artillerymen shot 1,738,000 rounds (Cowley). It would equal up to 217,250 rounds of artillery shells per day. The thought behind Haig's plan of bombardment was to destroy the fortified trenches and barbed wire placed in front of the German trenches, paving the way for British troops. "The enemy's position to be attacked was of a very considerable character, situated on high, undulating tract of ground.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of the Vietnamese warfare was extremely threatening to the United States Army. The Vietcong used tactics such as ambushing and booby traps. These tactics were unusual and unexpected to the United States army leaving them at a disadvantage. Another aspect that contributed to the Vietcong advanced warfare was their ability to blend in with Vietnam civilians. Because of their ability to blend in, many innocent civilians were murdered by the United States Army.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although tanks are largely regarded as the heart of the blitzkrieg, they were in fact only one component of the strategy. The Blitzkrieg was divided into 3 major components: tanks, infantry & light mechanized forces (such as motorcycles) and airplanes. Each part of Blitzkrieg worked in unison – the airplanes would clear dangerous areas for the tanks, such as artillery and heavy enemy fortifications by bombing, while the tanks themselves would break the enemy’s defensive lines, further protected by infantry, while providing protection for it at the same time. The infantry could then exploit the areas broken through by tanks, and continue to follow their path of destruction quickly on foot or by use of various vehicles, ranging from armored cars to…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snipers Marksmen who waited in hiding for opportunities to shoot soldiers in the opposing trenches…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An example for where the impact of tanks was so great and effective was during the Battle of Cambrai, November 1917. During this battle, the British used the…

    • 2055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US used many tactics during the war with Vietnam and the tactics used were usually for one of two purposes: to destroy the Vietcong or win over the peasantry, which was what the population of Vietnam generally consisted of. However, some tactics proved to be more effective than others, and they were inter-related as one often wouldn’t work without the other. The US Army, alongside the South Vietnamese Army (the ARVN) found it difficult to beat the Vietcong tactics.…

    • 2853 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tanks are designed for fast-moving battle in open terrain, where their mobility, firepower, and survivability make them ideal weapons platforms for high intensity combat. Operations in Urban areas reduce these attributes. Improper employment of armoured vehicles in urban operations, can result in the annihilation of its crew. Tanks and other armoured vehicles are vulnerable to attacks from close range by man-portable anti-tank weapons such as…

    • 2803 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays