Laws are rules and regulations that help a country run smoothly and prevent humans from doing anything we wish for. Canadian law is a set of laws compiled from different civilizations that consists of the code of Hammurabi, the Mosaic Law, the Greek Law, the Roman law, British law etc. Canadian law consists of many different aspects. These include common law, Magna Carta’s influence to the development of the Canadian charter of rights and freedom, and the trial system. The development of Canadian law has been influenced mostly by the British law.
Canadian law has inherited a lot of different principles from Great Britain. One of the things that the law has taken is the common law is common law which relies on case law and is common to all people. It does not matter who is breaking the law, whether it be the queen herself, everyone has to abide by the rules. The rule of Precedent has also been influenced by the British case law which is a method of deciding cases based on recorded decisions of similar cases. The jury system of Great Britain has influenced our jury in Canada. In olden times (In England), they consisted of 12 members. Now the jury consists of 6 people. Canada’s rules reflect British rules in a great way.
The Canadian charter of rights and freedom is a book which reflects on rights a Canadian is guaranteed to. The book resembles Magna Carta, which was a charter of political and civil rights signed by King Henry in 1215. This book was signed because of the abuse of power done by the king. This book ensured that kings did not have authority over everything (limited power). The book was the first step on establishing basic human rights for the people of England. It also developed the rule of law. The rule of law is acknowledged by Canadian law and it means that no one is above the law. Magna Carta also established habeas corpus which was a court order signed to prevent unlawful arrest. Canadian law recognizes this, in a form that a person can only stay in jail for 36 hours if no evidence is found. Great Britain’s law influenced the Canadian law the most.
The English were the ones who developed the different forms of trial for the accused. Trial by oath was when a close member of the family or a friend was to take an oath to set the accused free. This has been made part of Canadian law but instead a witness takes an oath to testify whatever he knows about the situation. The British also had a primitive way of settling disputes. This was that the accused and the victim to confront each other and winner was supposedly the one to win the case. This evolved to the modern day adversarial system in which the guilty and the innocent are represented by lawyers and instead of fighting with each other; the lawyers try to prove the opposite party wrong. This can be considered a controlled unphysical battle in courts in which the final decision rests in the lawyer proving the other rightfully charged and the judge’s final decision.
The English law is the main contributor in the development of Canadian law. The Canadian law has evolved and adapted to the British law. The Magna Carta influenced the Canadian charter of human rights. Common law has been acknowledged as the rule of law which means that no one is above the law. The different trial systems have changed and become more civil for the society today. Canadian law has been evolving throughout the years, the fundamentals of the law today were taken from the British, not only because Canada was under Britain’s rule once but because these rules showed respect towards human rights, and weren’t based on prejudice characteristics.
Words: 643
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Whenever someone states the country of Canada most people from other countries think of cold weathers, Mounties and people living in igloos. The reality is far from being that with there being warm summers and police with much better vehicles other than a horse. The country has a good government and a good justice system. Like most systems, the justice system in Canada is far from being perfect. There are multiple occasions where people are convicted of committing a crime that they truthfully did not do. One of that being Guy Paul Morin a Canadian citizen who was convicted for the murder and rape of his 9 year old neighbor Christine Jessop just for being weird. People can learn from Guy Paul Morin by him showing that the justice system has…
- 1201 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout history there has been many great pieces of law that have influenced the Canadian Laws we have today, but in my opinion I believe the most influential ones are Roman Law, the Magna Carta and Common Law.…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The law is an intricate system of principles that regulate the activity of citizens and enforce sanctions through imposition. This order was developed through a legal evolution that many individuals fail to recognize due to disinterest in history. In order to comprehend the current state of law, one must refer to the past as it enables individuals to appropriately analyze the future. The Magna Carta and The Quebec Act are key developments that played a vital role in the just formation of law in modern society.…
- 435 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To view how Canadian legislation has treated rape is to look at the Canadian criminal code. It was only in the 1892 that the Canadian legislation pronounced the act of rape to be a criminal act. This is because before 1892 the act of rape was considered a norm. Members of the society could rape another member without dealing with the consequences, or a man raping his wife without dealing with the consequences. These actions were considered a norm before the 1892. It was also said that a man could not rape his wife because they are already married and therefore she was considered a property. In the 1892 the Canadian criminal code defined rape as a criminal act, and the Canadian criminal code assigned punishments for one who commits rape. The…
- 306 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Magna Carta was a document Issued and signed by Kind John of England in 1215. It was recognized particular natural rights. “The Magna Carta did not declare rights for all Englishmen” (Hall & Feldmeier, 2013).…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Magna Carta or “The Great Charter” was created by Great Britain in 1215. It consisted of 63 clauses that dealt with the rights, customs, and administration of justice. It was put in place because of King John’s abuse of his people. He created chaos and did inhumane things to his people against the justice system. Only 3 of the original 63 clauses still remain which consist of “the clause confirming the privileges of the city of London and other towns; and the most famous clause of all which states that no free man shall be imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed or exiled without the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land” (Magna Carta 2008) The others have been replaced by modern laws and the original clauses were put in place so that limits were set on royalty and so that the King adhered to the law just like the rest of the people in Great Britain. This document has an impact on the evolution of the United States Constitution because…
- 825 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Bedford case goes hand-in-hand with many other security of the persons interest cases under section 7 of the Charter of Rights & Freedoms. Section 7 of the Charter states that “everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”[12] The Court stated that the purpose of section 7 is to ensure that laws that impact the rights to life, liberty and security of the person do not conflict with our basic values. The 'principles of fundamental justice’s are in place in order to understand these basic values about justice.The Court said that one of these principles is a principle against “arbitrariness, over-breadth and gross disproportionality”. A law is “arbitrary” when there is no real connection between the effect of the law and its goal. A law is “over-broad" when the effect of the law goes too far and interferes with activities that are not part of its goal. A law is “grossly disproportionate” when the effect of the law is much harsher than the benefits of achieving its goal. These are all points which relate back to the famous Bedford V. Canada case. In the Bedford case, the governments and the laws they put in place threaten health and bodily integrity of sex workers across the country. In the Bedford case, it was a unanimous decision on behalf of the court, they agreed with the applicants that the criminal prohibitions on bawdy-houses, living on the avails of prostitution, and communicating for the purposes of prostitution “do not merely impose conditions on how prostitutes operate”. They go on to further explain their point by shining light on the dangerous and hidden conditions of prostitution; it stops workers who are apart of dangerous — but legal — work from being able to protect themselves from risks. The Supreme Court found that these provisions, concerned with…
- 1075 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
The Magna Carta was the stepping stone for the constitution.It was the first document to challenge the Kings authority and prevlieges.This not only made the king abide by the law, but it also made sure the king couldn't over use his power.The king wasn't allowed to overly abuse his power as king. The Magna Carta has clauses, and these clause list certain laws everyone must abide by.The first Into clauses mainly talk about inheritance and land ownership”The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services. He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property.”Clauses six through 8 have to deal with marriage and courtship between people”At her husband's death, a widow may have her marriage portion and inheritance at once and without trouble.”Also it talks about women who lose their husbands and they are know widows. Clauses nine and…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Magna Carta was written in 1215. It was the first document to challenge the authority of the king, subjecting him to the rule of the law and protecting nobles from feudal abuse. When Englishmen went to the colonies they were given charters that guaranteed them and their heirs would “have and enjoy all liberties and immunities of free and natural subjects.” The document clearly stated that no free man could be prosecuted by any means other than the law of the land. The Magna Carta’s fundamental rights and principles included due process of law and trial by jury. Taking a cue from the document more than five centuries later, American revolutionaries incorporated many of the Magna Carta's basic ideas into another important piece of parchment – the U.S. Constitution.…
- 1552 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
A bill of rights might operate to prevent the government passing laws that remove or restrict basic human rights. These bills of rights are usually part of the country’s constitution. A bill of rights may empower a court to declare whether a law contravenes the bill of rights. In this respect, a bill of rights will prevail over inconsistent laws and practices. These bills of rights give judges significant powers to determine whether the parliament’s actions are lawful. The Canadian Charter of Rights operates in this way.…
- 164 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Constitution, a distinctly American invention that became the “gold standard” for world democracies thereafter, contains in its Bill of Rights (especially the Fifth Amendment) language that echoes the Magna Carta’s Article 39: “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Reference to the Great Charter has been made many times in the grand conversation of American politics through the years by U.S. presidents (e.g., FDR in his 1941 Inaugural Address) and other great political leaders. Most notably, the Magna Carta has been cited more than 100 times by the U.S. Supreme Court in its opinions and deliberations.…
- 849 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
e Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, patriated in 1982, is arguably the most fundamental base of law that exists in Canada. Section 2 of the Charter, also known as the Fundamental Freedoms, is a crucial part of the Charter because it protects citizens and gives them the freedom to follow and practice their own religion, have their own beliefs and opinions, express themselves as they wish and gather in peaceful assemblies (Jobb). Section 2(b) of the Charter, also known as the “freedom of expression”, states that Canadians have the “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication” (Class Note, Al-Hassani, 10/10/2014). This freedom is crucial in a democratic society because…
- 1369 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The Canadian citizens have lots of right; the Equality right is one of the important rights. Canada is a country…
- 677 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Magna Carta is a charter agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. The Magna Carta was published because King John was forced to submit to the demands of the rebel barons to agree to this document. It established that the king was subject to and not above the law which means it limited his power. He would often wage unnecessary wars and burden his subjects with heavy taxes to pay for them. King John begrudgingly signed the Magna Carta because he needed the barons to fight his wars and collect his taxes. It guaranteed that the king did not have as much power that he used to because they believed he was using his power to much. These rights are very much in the United States, the three branches of government…
- 187 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Is it possible for one simple ballot to create such an incredible impact on Canada’s welfare? Or is it a tad bit exaggerated, opposed to the in-depth and precise political aspect of thinking? In regards to the most recent election, Canada’s political parties have many differing viewpoints on the political, economical, and social forms of the “True, North, Strong, and Free” country that we all live in.…
- 1433 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays