Informal reflection

I chose to focus the majority of my revision on my zine instead of the rationale paper. I saw that there was no point in changing my rationale as it already explained most of the choices I made when I designed my zine. So instead of re-writing the original zine rationale, I just corrected the grammar and punctuation errors. On the other hand, I realized that my zine could be greatly enhanced with bigger pages. As mentioned in my zine rationale, I discussed about incorporating colors, more text and improving the quality of the text. Taking into account these two suggestive improvements, I had to re-illustrate everything that was on my original zine to new and bigger zine pages.
I had to redraw everything onto a bigger sheet of paper, because I was not able to figure out a method to enlarge the illustrations and text of my original zine to fit it onto a bigger sheet. Also drawing and writing everything over again allowed me to correct the dullness and faded appearance of the text. The drawing and writing process was extremely long (especially with more space), and I felt like I was designing another zine. Though it was tedious work, the zine came out looking exactly like the original, which was the challenge.
During the process of recreating my zine, I did not exclude anything that was on the original zine. I kept every detail the same because I felt like they were all good, and the feedback I received for my original zine did not mention anything in regards to omitting any detail. One thing that I did differently was that I ordered my zine chronologically from technologies near the future to technologies in the distant future. For example, unlike my original zine, the new zine first discuss about future androids because the technology is closer to being established or implemented compared to time traveling, which is introduced last as that kind of technology will not be possible anytime soon. I just thought that it would give my zine a better fill with some