Preview

Informative Essay: Stop And Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Informative Essay: Stop And Frisk
Stop and Frisk

“NYPD’s controversial Stop and Frisk policy ruled unconstitutional” by Kerry Wills, Robert Gearty, and Stephen Rex Brown; which was polished January 8th, 12013. A major part of “Stop and Frisk’ in New York City is, NYPD is that it’s unconstitutional. The community feels that people feel that there is racial issue towards stopping and frisking. Manhattan Federal Court Judge Shira Scheindlin ordered police to reduce the amounts of trespass and abusing their power to frisk everyone. Juan Gonzalez feels that, “Too many innocents harassed by NYPD’s “Stop and Frisk” policy.” The police department were practicing, Stop and Frisking in front of a private residential building. The police Commissioner Raymond Kelly totally agreed with the police officers practicing to stop and frisk. Raymond Kelly states, “Some take for granted the safety provided by doormen....” Part of the community disagrees and agrees with them practicing stop and frisk and most people feel like it seem to be racial profiling. …show more content…
A police officer who reasonably suspects a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony, stops and questions that person. If the officer feels the suspects he or she is in danger of physical injury. I personally disagree with “Stop and Frisk” because of the way how the cops approach a person and assume who is a danger to others and to themselves. Stop and Frisk is one of the biggest issue for New Yorkers because it has increased so much, which was also bringing up a lot of controversial issue. For example, racial issues, cops abusing their authority, and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study
    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Terry Stop Case Study

    Justice Harlan wholeheartedly agree with the Court 's ultimate holding in this case, He was constrained to fill in a few gaps, as he saw it because what was said by this Court has serve as initial guidelines for law enforcement authorities and courts throughout the land as this important new field of law develops. A police officer 's right to make an on-the-street "stop" and an accompanying "frisk" for weapons is, of course, bounded by the protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds and he agrees, that, while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most cases is whether evidence produced by a frisk is admissible, the problem is to determine what makes a frisk reasonable. Concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public, and though that danger might not warrant routine general weapons checks, it could well warrant action on less than a "probability." In the absence of state authority, policemen have no more right to "pat down" the outer clothing of passers-by, or of persons to whom they address casual questions, than does any other citizen. Consequently, the Ohio courts did not rest the constitutionality of this frisk upon any…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: The End Racial Profiling Act
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary: The End Racial Profiling Act

    The bill to prohibit the use of racial profiling is known as the “The End Racial Profiling Act” as introduced by Benjamin L. Cardin. Cardin widely addresses the deceptive practice of racial profiling by law enforcement on five levels. First, it visibly defines the racially prejudiced practice of racial profiling by law enforcement at all levels. Second, it generates a federal prohibition against racial profiling. Thirdly, it mandates data collection so we can completely assess the factual degree of the problem. Fourth, it provides funding for the reinstruction of law enforcement officials on how to stop and avoid the use of racial profiling. Fifth and finally, it holds law enforcement agencies that continue to use racial profiling…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Controversial Law: The Stop And Frisk Case
    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Controversial Law: The Stop And Frisk Case

    The “stop and frisk” or “Terry frisk” law is one of the most controversial laws in America. The law came about via a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest. This only holds if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the suspect maybe presently armed and or dangerous. The coming about of this law all started with a concealed weapons arrest in Cleveland, Ohio in the early 1960’s.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Difference Between The Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Is The Difference Between The Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons

    Sometimes I feel as though some officers take it for far and do things that they shouldn't. If someone knows what's wrong and right they would know better than to go out and do something dumb. I feel as though the stop and frisk is something can be helpful to people everywhere. If someone knows they aren't doing anything wrong or have any weapons on them then there should not be a problem. They should go along with the officer and do whatever is asked and there will not be a problem. It becomes a problem when people do not cooperate and want to start fighting back. Officers are just trying to do their job and protect everyone. Sometimes they can be wrong about who they stop but at least know that person knows what they were doing is suspicious and not good to do around. The case took long to process because it was hard trying to figure out if the officer had the right to seize the weapon. In order to search someone you have to have probable cause. The court then denied the motion to suppress and Terry and Chilton pleaded not guilty. The judge then determined that they were…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Criminology - Causes of the 2011 London Riots
    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Criminology - Causes of the 2011 London Riots

    Bowling, B. and Phillips C., (2007) “Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search”. Modern Law Review. 70(6)…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Summary
    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Racial Profiling Summary

    One could also argue that the president of the U.S, Donald Trump, claimed that the use of stop and frisk reduced crime in NYC. However, what Johnson and Trump fail to realize is that the data they are referring to is all inaccurate because it was based on racial profiling. The use of stop and frisk proved that officers focus more on skin color rather than the behavior of an individual, proving that criminological data will mostly always be inaccurate. According to the accurate data presented by Christopher Mathias, nearly 80% of stops were blacks and Latinos and 13% of them were whites yet, “a weapon was found in only 1.8 percent of blacks and Latinos frisked, as compared to a weapon being found in 3.8 percent of whites frisked.” Over 70% of the stops were blacks and Latinos and still whites had a higher percentage of carrying a weapon, which is over 50% of the cause for…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Stop And Frisk
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Stop And Frisk

    Even though, people who are in favor of stop and frisk are from the city government and from the police department, many other supporters are general residents of New York City who have being affected for the increase of assaults, robberies, and gun violence. In this scenario, I found a heart-breaking story from the New York Post about a seven year old girl who was grazed on her leg by a bullet when she was outside of her grandpa’s house in South Bronx. After that, the girl’s father called for more cops in the neighborhood and also, more “stop and frisk”. He said to support this tool because “it will help prevent shootings and situations like this. In my…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk
    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and Frisk

    First let’s ask what does Stop and frisk actually mean legally? “It’s the situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon.”…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of stop and frisk
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of stop and frisk

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law
    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    Ethnicity and Stop and Frisk laws have become a topic of concern because it questions the constitutional right of the fourth amendment. Police Officers are said to abuse power given their authority to stop and frisk a person under the “reasonable suspicion” clause of the fourth amendment. This research will argue that reasonable suspicion is subject to personal interpretation of police officers and perjury may be involved. With that being said minorities of Black and Hispanic backgrounds are the targeted population for this course of action.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Research Paper
    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Stop And Frisk Research Paper

    Police Officers work for many hours and most of those hours are stopping people on the street to see what they carry. Stop and frisk is “One of the most controversial police procedures is the stop and frisk search. This type of limited search occurs when police confront a suspicious person in an effort to prevent a crime from taking place. The police frisk (pat down) the person for weapons and question the person,” (Farlex, 2008, pg. 1). How stop and frisk became the system used by police officers was…

    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop Frisk
    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stop Frisk

    In the city where crime was at all time high during the nineties, the top politicians in New York City decided that something should be done to help stop crime. The NYPD implemented the “Stop and Frisk” policy to bring the crime rate down in the city. However it did more than exceed its expectations and it has been more of a negative than a positive. This policy created tension between the NYPD and the law abiding citizens of New York City because thousands stopped were people of the Black and Latino communities. According to the US Census Bureau NYC has a population of 8,336,697 people. Blacks and Latinos make up 53% of the city population. 85% of New Yorkers stopped are Black and Latino men and 6% of that number actually led to an arrest (NYCLU). At this shocking percentage, it’s apparent that this policy is discriminatory against Blacks and Latinos. Not only is this policy discriminatory, it has violated citizens constitutional rights and been deemed racial profiling.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    stop and frisk

    In America there have been multiple tyrannical actions that the government have used on citizens and innocent bystanders. One of these actions are called “Stop and Frisk” which is a prevalent tactic used, especially in New York. “Stop and Frisk” means to be randomly searched by police or high authority when they suspect a bystander is carrying something suspicious. “Stop and Frisk” is a political issue that has been a concern for a long period of time. According to the articles “Growing up with Stop and Frisk” by Sara Maria Glanowski and “Why Stop and Frisk Matters, Even if You Don’t Live in New York” by Andrew Cohen, the cons towards “Stop and Frisk” is clearly stated and relevant. People are being stopped based off racial profiling, while statistics proves that majority of the time, they are innocent. Stop and Frisk must be impermissible and abolished because it is unconstitutional and individuals are stopped based off appearance and not on evidence that proves there guilty.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Intro to Policing Essay
    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Intro to Policing Essay

    Hispanic culture includes Mexicans, Cubans, South Americans, Central Americans, and Puerto Ricans. The number of Hispanic officers is increasing each year. An advantage Hispanic officers have are that these officers can relate to Hispanic communities by knowing their language and cultural barrier. South Florida is being dominated by Cubans while in Central America and South America; Mexicans are the largest group along the border. There are different types of Hispanics. There are the Hispanic descent which are born and raised in the U.S. but do not speak any Spanish; there are Hispanic officers who were born in Mexico and are bilingual but were raised in the U.S.; the last group of Hispanics would be the officers who were born and raised in Mexico and became U.S. citizens. Hispanics who were raised and born in Mexico are the officers who may relate the most to residents in which they build a relationship and trust with each other. Hispanic officers are faced daily with discrimination and other controversy issues. Organizations were made with goals of meeting the challenge of selecting, promoting, and retaining Hispanic American men and women in the criminal justice system. This would be the Hispanic American Police Command Officers Association which was established in 1973. Many of these organizations are not offered in smaller departments. Making officers become bilingual would make it easier for Hispanic officers to not feel discriminated in situations in which an officer is needed on a scene to translate. Many people who come from Central and South America do not trust many officers in the U.S. because they were always faced with corrupt and abusive cops. Immigrants often feel more comfortable in calling in certain officers in which they know they can relate to them. They will often not even make a phone call in case of an emergency if they believe that officers are corrupt. Being Hispanic, I have been stopped by…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Law Enforcement
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Law Enforcement

    Imagine coming home one day and having to be told that one of your loved ones has died for something as simple as a traffic offense or a fistfight with a friend. Of course these actions are not justified, but are they really deserving of being killed? Recently here in the USA there have been numerous deaths of young African American men by the police for very small offenses, and many say these deaths are fueled by racism. A great example of this is in Milwaukee in which 23 year-old Syville Smith was running from his car at a traffic stop and was shot in the chest and arm, eventually leading to death. This event much like others really brings up the question, how do recent events in Milwaukee impact the law enforcement’s reputation across the country and…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics