Preview

Inherit The Wind: An Inequitable Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1927 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inherit The Wind: An Inequitable Law
Laws are one of the most important parts in the life of a human today and they have been for many centuries. They decide what people in that region can or cannot do and if you break a law you get punishment, sometimes a fine, sometimes a jail sentence, and sometimes you can even get put on death row. But do citizens have to follow a law if it is unjust? In the play, Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, this occurred, Bertram Cates, a public school teacher in Hillsboro, Tennessee in 1925 broke an unjust law called the Butler Act. The Butler Act prohibits public school teacher from denying the Biblical account of man’s origin, or in simpler words, teachers couldn’t teach their students the theory of Evolution by Charles Darwin. …show more content…
An inequitable law should be repealed because it denies citizens their Constitutional rights. The First Amendment of the Constitution grants citizens may rights and freedoms. One of these rights is freedom of religion or lack thereof. The first amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”(U.S Constitution, Amendment I). The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America and it protects many of its citizens’ rights. Bertram Cates had his 1st Amendment right taken by the Butler Act because it stopped him from expressing his opinion which is protected under the “freedom of speech” all residents of the U.S. have. Additionally, in Inherit The Wind, while talking to Rachel after his arrest Cates says, “You know why I did it. I had the book in my hand, Hunter’s Civic Biology. I opened it up, and read my sophomore science class Chapter 17, Darwin’s Origin of Species. All it says is that man wasn’t just stuck here like a geranium in a flower pot; …show more content…
After jury passed its verdict, that Bertram Cates is guilty, Cates asks Drummond “But what’s going to happen now? I haven’t got a job. I’ll bet they won’t even let me back in the boarding house. DRUMMOND: Sure it’s gonna be tough, it’s not gonna be any church social for a while. But you’ll live. And while they’re making you sweat remember- you’ve helped the next fella. CATES: What do you mean? DRUMMOND: You don’t suppose this kind of thing is ever finished, do you? Tomorrow it’ll be something else- and another fella will have to stand up. And you've helped give him the guts to do it” (Lawrence and Lee 123). All it takes for society to evolve is for one person to stand up for what they believe in and what is right. That starts a domino effect, people realize what is happening is wrong and they stand up for it too. What Cates did, standing up to a law like the Butler Act probably inspired other people to stand up to other unjust laws and organizations. This happened again very recently, a brave person stood up for what he believed in and changed his society for the better. “Liu Xiaobo took part in the student protests on Tiananmen Square in 1989. For that, he was sentenced to two years in prison. Later he served three years in a labor camp for having criticized China's one-party system. For over twenty years, Liu has fought for a more open and democratic China. He demands that the Chinese authorities

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inherit the Wind Act 1

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    13. Rev. Brown uses words such as vicious and a Godless man to describe Drummond.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, there was a confusion either to rule that the government burdened the person’s religious freedom or not. The reason why the RFRA was declared unconstitutional is that “the act was a considerable congressional intrusion into the states” and had no general authority. In this case, the religious freedom restoration act serves as a remedial measure than serving as a preventive rule. Therefore, it is essential to have a congruence between the ends sought to be achieved and the means to be used.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having no say against these laws is also an example of injustice. Who would want to live under a code of laws that are hypocritical, unfair, and unjust?…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are just laws and there are unjust laws. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Constitution has the biggest say so overall. It is what keeps the church and state separated. Politics, media, school, etc. all try to include the church in something they might do, but it just simply is going against the Constitution. There have many cases where the law has “bent” the rules and allowed certain activities and had so- called reasoning. The government should not force anyone into a religious sector, this means avoiding prayer in classrooms, or favoring specific religions over others, and by not providing government funding. Is it okay to allow certain cases, but not others? Just as Carter states, “that understanding the distinction is the key to preserving the necessary separation of church and state without resorting to a philosophical rhetoric that treats religion as an inferior way for citizens to come to public…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Nelson Mandela and Cesar Chavez stood up for what is right. Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison for trying to overthrow the Pro-Apartheid Government. After Nelson Mandela left prison, he worked to achieve Human Rights and a better future for everyone in South Africa. Nelson Mandela was born in…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He becomes annoyed when the judge will not let him call scientists as his witnesses, so he exclaims, “For it is my intent to show this court that what Bertram Cates spoke quietly one spring afternoon in the Hillsboro High School is no crime!” (Lawrence and Lee 83). Drummond is not giving up on proving that his client is innocent and will do nearly anything to do so. Unfortunately, he has to give up after insistently naming other scientists to use for his proof that evolution is valid, for the judge orders that they have nothing to do with the trial. Drummond is persistent, once again, when potential jurors are being interviewed to make sure that they are not biased towards one side of the case. He explains that “All I want is to prevent the clock-stoppers from dumping a load of medieval nonsense into the United States Constitution” (Lawrence and Lee 47). This is after Brady unjustly accuses him of allowing pro-evolutionists into the jury, even though Drummond was being fair about whom he chose. By saying this, Drummond is persisting that he wants the whole jury to be fair to both sides so that there is a fair trial. This way, he can have the same chance of winning as Brady without any biased opinions that are against him. Therefore, Drummond’s use of persistence aids him in having a better chance at winning the trial by continuously proving his…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain and The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, the main characters clearly do not play by the rules. In both novels, the protagonists commit their fair share of crimes. Although many of their actions are against the law, the characters are not aiming to cause harm to anyone. By committing some of these crimes, they are attempting to right a wrong, even if that means breaking the law. The point of instituting laws is to uphold morals; to keep people safe and make sure things are as fair as they can be. In some situations, though, as demonstrated by real-life historical events like segregation and by characters like Tom Joad and Huckleberry Finn, the law itself is not so moral. Both Twain's and Steinbeck's…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anyone can say that a law is unfair and unjust. However, who is really willing to accept the consequences for going against this law? Is breaking this law really worth the punishment? The government is the one to decide whether a law is reasonable, but what if a member of the public believes that a law is not? Should he rebel against this law? Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. answered yes to this question and believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They both believed that government had many flaws. They shared many beliefs in the same subjects concerning Civil Disobedience but had many different views on how the government should work and how the citizen should be treated by society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To start off, Dr. Martin Luther King’s view for an unjust law is “a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.” (King 4) He believes that any law that degrades human personality is an unjust law. An unjust law is basically a code that inflicts on minority that is not binding itself. A concrete example of an unjust law is basically difference made legal. Another explanation of an unjust law by Dr. King is “An unjust law is a code inflicted upon a minority which that minority had no part in enacting or creating because it did not have that unhampered right to vote” (King 4). In King’s letter, he describes how the segregation law in Alabama was not democratically elected. He does this by stating that throughout the state of Alabama there are many methods used to prevent Negroes from voting, or even becoming registered voters. He also explains how there are some states and countries without a single Negro registered to vote despite the fact that Negroes constitute a majority of the population in most states and countries. Dr. King stated in his letter that he was arrested for a charge of parading without a permit. This is an example of a law that is just on its face and unjust in its application. Of course, the law is the law and there is nothing worng with the ordinance on parading without a permit, but when the ordinance is used to prevent just,…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1954 Supreme court decision outlining segregation in public schools improved because of the “Law’ and not because of “moral” acceptance. Dr. King is specific in describing two types of laws: the just laws, and unjust laws. Dr. King referred to St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all”. He connected just laws to moral law or the law of God. He described an unjust law as a man-made code that does not kinship or is out of harmony with the moral law rooted in eternal or natural law. King makes the difference clear by describing an unjust law as not binding on the majority of people or itself. The majority follows a just law and minority as well, equal and distributed…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King says an unjust law is “a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself….difference made legal.”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a perfect world, laws would be unnecessary. We would all love our neighbor and regulate our behavior accordingly, but we don't live in that world. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said:…

    • 5163 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthesis Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral obligations can be seen a variety of different ways, depending on the person. Some may think it is a person’s moral obligation to submit to a law even if they believe the law is wrong. Others think the opposite, if a person believes something is unjust why would they follow it. Everyone has a different point of view and after reading The Scarlet Letter by Hawthorne, The Letter from Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr., Laws Scarlet Letter by Korobkin and Lyceum Address by Lincoln, it is important to follow ones conscience. This may seem unjust, but is it just to support an unjust law? This is where the controversy comes in, and why after reading these three types of literature, the idea of supporting something unjust is completely wrong and breaks down the justice system.…

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As citizens we should follow the laws that supports one another. On the other hand, some laws in America are unjustified. It seem like some laws just want to keep people under control and not free . I truly believe if every citizen in America follow the law without problems the government will control our lives like puppets.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays