Preview

Inner Conflict In Robert Browning's Short Story 'Choices'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Inner Conflict In Robert Browning's Short Story 'Choices'
Inner conflict is the number one cause of depression and anxiety that is now found in approximately 3.2 million Canadian youth in today’s society. It is often an internal fight, man against self, one of the hardest battle one will ever have to face. With daily life, choices are always presented, and are made much harder when one is dealing with self conflict themselves. In the short story “ Choices” Susan Kerslake presents us with a young lady, Peggy, who starts of with making simple choices in the beginning of the story and later on bigger decisions that impact her choices from before. Another example of inner conflict is displayed in the poem “ My Last Duchess” by Robert Browning. In this poem the duke struggles with extreme jealousy towards …show more content…
The controlling aspect of where fear is found is in the amygdala gland, that controls your senses and muscles - “enabling your body to quickly react to the sound of a threat”. Because of the amygdala gland there is two responses to fear, “fight or flight”. And this is the reason why General Zaroff in the short story “ The Most Dangerous Game” finds hunting animals too easy, because of their response to fear, flight. Humans on the other hand are intellectual creatures who take the fight stance when it comes to fear, hence creating a challenging chase that the General wishes for. When Rainsford is introduced to General Zaroff he takes his chance for another interesting chase with his new huntee. Rainsford, who had been earlier dismissing the fact that animals had fear when being hunted was soon faced with the same situation he had never expected. Fearful, Rainsford takes on the challenge of being hunted, by General Zaroff. During his three days of survival, General Zaroff has faced reality of Rainsford winning the challenge. “ The general sucked in his breath and smiled. “ I congratulate you,” he said, “You have won the game.” Rainsford did not smile, “ I am still a beast at bay. he said, in a low hoarse voice. “ Get ready, General Zaroff.” The general made his deepest bows. “ I see, he said. “ Splendid!’ One of us is to furnish for the hounds the other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford. . . .” He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided (lines 208 - 215). Fearless, Rainsford kills the general, despite his thoughts of murder being a cold-blooded

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, Whitney says, “I’d rather think they fear one thing- Fear, the fear of pain, and the fear of death.” At this time in the story Whitney is explaining to Rainsford how animals feel when they are being hunted. Rainsford doubts him and insists animals do not have feelings. He is being very naive about fear and does not think hunting is wrong. His view on fear and hunting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff directly states, “ I hunt the scum of the earth: sailors from tramp ships-lassars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels- a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them.”(Richard Connell 5) The general also explains to Rainsford how this is the only worthy opponent left that still intrigues him and gives him the thrill of the hunt. Mainly because they are the only quarry that can have reason versus the other quarries who only have instinct. Consequently Rainsford was the next prey the general had in mind. Zaroff says that, “ Instinct is no match for reason.”(Richard Connell 5) The final way that the reader can analyze Zaroff’s thrill seeking trait is his ability to understand his limits, and know that a hunt is only exciting if it’s prey is a contest to his abilities. This can be inferred in the story when Zaroff tracked Rainsford through the forest in the dark, and when he did find Rainsford, he simply turned and walked away with his smile on his face. The reader could infer and Rainsford said, “The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day's sport.”(Richard Connell 10) This shows the reader that killing his own prey is of no enjoyment to Zaroff unless it is a challenge. This is why Zaroff did not kill Rainsford the first time, because he is not…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford will not take over General Zaroff’s game of hunting other humans. For instance, when General Zaroff asks Rainsford to go hunting, he says, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(25) Rainsford classifies himself as someone who hunts animals, but not humans. He disapproves of General Zaroff’s game and most likely still does. In addition, while Rainsford is being hunted, he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.”(31) Rainsford is truly afraid at this point just like other humans are when they are being hunted. He has had the horrifying experience and probably doesn’t want anyone to feel this fear. As a result, Rainsford is a gentleman and animal…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the reading "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell there are multiple incidents of suspense. One of these moments is Rainsford's first encounter with a man named Ivan, who greeted Rainsford with pistol pointed straight at his chest. Almost immediately, the reader began to anticipate whether this character would die, survive, or suffer other consequences such as injury causing tension in the story. Another occurrence of suspense is when General Zaroff begins to tell of the most dangerous game, hence the title. As he begins tell of his life, he states that the animals he had been once so fond of hunting had ceased to be "a sporting proposition" and that they no longer were of fascination. It then became his aspiration to create…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Most Dangerous Game, Connell describes Rainsford, the protagonist, as a renowned hunter. Connell uses the opening conversation between Rainsford and Whitney, Rainsford’s companion on the yacht, to enlighten the reader to Rainsford’s attitude of indifference concerning the prey that he hunts. As fate would have it, Rainsford is marooned on an island where he meets another hunter, General Zaroff. As the story progresses, Rainsford begins to see the façade of civility disappear and the real nature of the General come to surface. The General explains how hunting man is the logical progression of their art and that they are actually kindred souls. Rainsford is appalled by the comparison of their two natures and clings to the moral high ground. That is until the General forces Rainsford to now become the prey. Rainsford, now the prey, calls upon not only his vast knowledge and experience of the hunt but also his primeval instinct of survival. Connell takes the reader through many twists and turns giving hope for Rainsford around each corner only to take it away. Due to the cunningness and resourcefulness of Rainsford, the General is given literally the best hunt of his life. In the end, Rainsford outsmarts the General…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rainsford Quotes

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rainsford is at first very obstinate but through his experiences with Zaroff throughout the story he grows and understands how it really feels to be hunted and he gains empathy for the animals. We see this throughout his actions during the hunt. Rainsford starts to feel genuine fear and terror as he waits to see if he will make it through the day, we see this expressed once he starts to hear the hounds on page 78. Only one page later on page 79 the author tells us Rainsford now understands how an animal at bay feels. By the end we can infer he no longer sees hunting as a game, but as cruel entertainment. Throughout the story we see Rainsford exhibit very knowledgeable acts for example, on page 64 he shows his knowledge in weaponry when he finds…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford changes his entire philosophy about hunting. For example, when Whitney disagreed with him about jaguars he said, “You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”(Connell). Rainsford believes animals have no understanding of what is happening, therefore, it’s okay to hunt them. He doesn’t care if they feel pain or understand death and shows no remorse. In addition, when General Zaroff set the hounds to get Rainsford, he “knew now how an animal at bay feels” (Connell). Rainsford has to run away, set traps, and continuously risk his life to have a better chance at surviving. He felt the way animals do when they are being hunted and finally understood…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often times, we endure problems within ourselves that can either be solved or left alone to embrace. Whether it is mental or physical, many of us find it natural to undergo inner-conflict. In the two passages, “The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man” and “Quicksand,” the authors provide the audience with a theme that connects them both. After uncovering their internal conflict, they eventually decided to unknowingly distract themselves from the issue. This includes the way the authors utilized the setting and characters to convey their theme. When dealing with inner-conflict, the theme is developed by expressing personal past issues, discovering new people, and ultimately uncovering a sudden romance.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear is a primal human emotion. It drives us to do things, or not do things, and generally keeps us safe. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford is neither a very relatable nor believable character. He remains confident after he gets tricked multiple times, he is too analytical of the situations he finds himself in, he doesn’t and he doesn’t seem to have very much fear about being hunted by the madman Zaroff like wild game. He also does not seem to be too skeptical of a well cultured, master sportsman, living on an unmarked island who wants to invite him into his home to stay.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell shows that Rainsford is regretful, anxious, and fearful. First, it is shown that Rainsford is regretful due to the fact that General Zaroff gives him the option to play the most dangerous game or be whipped by Ivan, to which Rainsford chooses to play the game. Rainsford tries again and again to fall asleep at night, but he is helpless with his choice replaying in his mind. “Rainsford could not quiet his brain with the opiate of sleep.” Second, Rainsford’s anxiousness is shown because he is uneasy about the thought of not being able to see the day after next. Although he is a marvelous hunter, there is a possibility that he may be no match to someone who is undefeated in assassinating humans.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rainsford Argument

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page

    As a result, He now understands how the animals feel now that he has been hunted. Rainsford is arguing with the general that animals cannot reason. ”[He] [says] no animal[s] can reason”Complain Rainsford” (Connell 27). Know that he knows how the animals feel he thinks that no animal can reason to his disagreement. General Zaroff has now found Rainsford. ”Rainsford heard his breath the general's [attention] had went up to the tree”But the [edge] eyes of the hunter [had] stopped before they [could] reach the limb where Rainsford [had] lay[ed]; a [grin] [began] [to] spread over his brown face” (Connell 33). Now that rainsford understands how the animals feel when General Zaroff found him every muscle in his body had tensed. Rainsford has…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has a life full of choices. They have to choose between right or wrong, left or right, and up or down. Choices reflect self-discipline, as well as character. They also permanently affect one’s life, whether it be in a positive or a negative manner. Choices can also dictate whether or not someone reaches their wildest dreams. As everyone has lives full of choices, everyone has dreams. But as all things do, dreams progressively get more and more realistic with age. “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost, and “Harlem” by Langston Hughes are two well-written poems that have similar real-life themes; choices, and dreams.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the heart aroused

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “It seems that to find the real path we have to go off the path we are on now, even for an instant, and earn the privilege of losing our way. As the path fades, we are forced to take a good look at the life in which we actually find ourselves.” This thought from the author and poet David Whyte brings up important concepts about our lives. Sometimes taking a step back and observing our own nature is all we need in order to better understand ourselves and where we are going. However, it seems that along this path we spend far more time worrying and fretting about our fears than what it required to confront them and deal with them.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Waiting hurts. Forgetting hurts. But not knowing which decision to take can sometimes be the most painful.” –Jose N. Harris. Choosing the poem that appealed to me the most turned out to be a pain in the neck. We make countless decisions like this every day, and although this is not a life-changing decision, we have all at some point in our lives come across a difficult and stressful situation. The wide range of connections and the accuracy of this message made “Ordinance on Lining Up” by Naomi Lazard appeal to me the most. It was written similarly to a descriptive manual for making choices, whether significant or insignificant. By not taking a side but striving to represent each line correctly, it led the reader to put more thought into the decisions they make every day. And unlike narratives, character portraits, or landscapes, decision-making cannot be searched up for analysis even on the extremely useful Wikipedia. Making choices stimulates our minds to think of the long and short term effects of our decisions, which this poem encourages us to do along with the use of figures of speech, poetic devices, and imagery.…

    • 811 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “No pressure, no diamonds.” This amazing quote was once stated by Thomas Carlyle. It emphasizes the importance of the challenges and difficulties life puts us through, as without these hurdles, humankind would not have advanced this far. These adversities and hardships often bring out the mental strengths in people, and can even bolster their will to elevate or propel themselves to success. Heroic and exceptional human beings people are strengthened through the demanding struggles, bringing about their large mental capacities and high morale and thereby resulting in one’s development of hope and resilience and graciousness. Unfortunately, hardships can also cause the downfall of people. Some just cannot handle the stress, and they crumble underneath the pressure, causing mental breakdowns, and therefore cause them to concede. This is one theme Roald Dahl explores in his clever short story, “Poison.” Thus, Dahl examines the idea that the mounting pressure of some hardships can fully reveal the true qualities of an human’s individual’s personality and spirit – his sense of integrity – meaning he is , either self-respecting and affectionate or bitter and detestable.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays