Preview

Innovation in Private Labels- The Case Study of Marks and Spencer and the challenge when applying to private labels’ market in Vietnam.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Innovation in Private Labels- The Case Study of Marks and Spencer and the challenge when applying to private labels’ market in Vietnam.
Essay
Innovation in Private Labels- A case study of Marks and Spencer- British retailer and the challenge when applying to private labels’ market in Vietnam.

Name: NGUYEN ANH PHUONG

List of Abbreviation:
List of Figures
List of Tables:
I.

Introduction:………………………………………………………………..4

II.

Literature review …………………………………………………………..5

1. Overview of private labels………………………………………………….5
A. Definition of Private Labels…………………………………………………………………................5
B. Global Private label trends……………………………………………………………………………..6
C. Private labels vs National brand……………………………………………………………………..8
D. Incentives for Retailers to Create a Strong Private Label Program:……………..........9

E. Buying behaviors of private labels……………………………………………………………........9
2. Concept of Innovation:……………………………………………………14
A. Definition of Innovation………………………………………………………………………………….14
B. Business concept innovation…………………………………………………………………………..16
C. Types of innovation……………………………………………………………………………………….17

III.

Innovation in Private labels:……………………………………………..18
1. The motivation of doing innovation in private labels:……………...18
A. From the consumers’ point of view:……………………………………………....18
Page 2

B. From the retailers’ point of views…………………………………………………19

2. How private labels innovate:………………………………………….20
3. The impact of innovation’s private labels in general………………..25
IV.

Case study of Marks and Spencer in innovation of their private labels:26

1. Background of Marks and Spencer:……………………………………………………...26
2. Innovation in food private labels:………………………………………………………...27

V.

The challenge when applying innovation model in private label in
Vietnam:………………………………………………………………….30

1. Private label industry in Vietnam………………………………………………………..30
2. The challenge of innovation ‘s private labels in Vietnam……………………………….30

VI.

Conclusion and recommendation:………………………………………32
Referecences:………………………………………………………………32

Page 3

List of Abbreviation:
GM: Genetic



References: Drucker, PF (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row. Scotchmer, S (2006). Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sohlenius, G (2008). The Nature of the Industrial Innovation Process. UK: Coxmoor Publishing Company. Utterback, J (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. 2006, Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes, pp Rosenberg, N (2004). Innovation and Economic Growth. OECD, 2004. Welfens, PJJ, JT Addison, DB Audretsch, T Gries and H Grupp (2008). Globalization, Economic Growth, Innovation Dynamics Barsky, M, M. Bergen, S. Dutta, and D. Levy (2001) What can the Price Gap between Branded and Private Label Products Tell Us about Markups? NBER Working Paper No O’Bornick. M.. 2003. The future of private label food and Drink. Growth Strategies for retailers and manufacturers” Page 32 Traill, W.B., Meulemberg, M.,(2002), “Innovation in the Food Industry”, Agribusiness, Vol Gassmann, O. and Wecht, C.H. 2005, Early Customer Integration into the Innovation ProcessTowards a Conceptual Managerial Model, Proceedings of the 12th International Product Development Management Conference; Copenhagen, available at http://www.bgwsg. com/doc/chw2.pdf, (18/04/2008). Mills. D.E.. 1995.Why retailers sell private labels. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy O’Bornick. M.. 2003. The future of private label food and Drink. Growth Strategies for retailers and manufacturers” Quelch. J.A.. and D. Harding. 1996. Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win. Harvard Business Review CONFIDENTIAL & ©RetailNet Group, www.retailnetgroup.com Page, 2010, Marks & Spencer’s Private Label Shows its Colors Ha Huy Dung, 2012,” The private label trend in Vietnam and its challenge”, MA Page 33

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Kudler Fine Foods is the brain child of Kathy Kudler. She envisioned a one stop gourmet food store and has grown to three locations to date. She continues to maintain direct control over large bulk purchase order items, stringent customer service policies, and hiring. The following is a discussion of how the organization competes in the marketplace and the strengths and weaknesses of the firm as indicated by the marketing surveys completed by their customers. There will also be discussion of the market structure which best applies to the organization and how that structure positively and negatively affects the firm, how the effectiveness of the competitive strategies in the market structure affect the organization’s long-term profitability, and what competitive strategies recommendations may be made.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to succeed, it is fundamental that businesses satisfy consumers’ needs (and desires) for goods and services. Appropriate market research provides the data necessary to understand those needs and respond to them effectively and profitably. Kudler Fine Foods (KFF) has performed market research in the past. Some of that research has been helpful; some has not. Additional market research is needed for KFF to reach a larger share of the market and increase profitability.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Martinez and Kaufman’s “Twenty Years of Competition Reshape the U.S. Food Marketing System,” the food market is becoming increasingly competitive. Over the last 20 years there have been tremendous changes in the way food is bought in the retail market. Consumers are looking for value and differentiation and the retailers are working hard to follow.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kudler Fine Foods is the brain child of Kathy Kudler. She envisioned a one stop gourmet food store and has grown to three locations to date. She continues to maintain direct control over large bulk purchase order items, stringent customer service policies, and hiring. This paper discusses how the organization competes in the marketplace and the strengths and weaknesses of the company according to the marketing surveys their customers completed. The following also discusses which market structure best applies to the organization and how that structure positively and negatively affects the firm, how the effectiveness of the competitive strategies in the market structure affect the organization’s long-term profitability, and what competitive strategy recommendations may be made.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mkt Week 2

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Market growth is a rise or escalation in the demand for a specific product over a period of time. Market growth can be decreased if the company does not produce a demanding product or service at the reasonable price for the consumer (Business Dictionary, 2012). KFF knows that their specialty food market signifies a modest part of produce sales in Canada. Though, as the public looks to healthier lifestyles and improved eating habits, stores like Kudler will be highly recommended in the Canadian markets. The evidences demonstrate proven growth in the United States market that could translate to similar success in Canada. “Total sales of specialty foods in 2010 were $70.32 billion, with $55.92 billion of sales at retail; Specialty foods represent 13.1 percent of all retail food sales; 76 percent of specialty food manufacturers report sales…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief Trader Joes

    • 659 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Trader Joe’s sales rely on 80% of private label products that tend to be 20% of the sales of a typical supermarket. Also, when costumers search for first necessity…

    • 659 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this assignment we analyzed Target’s private labels. Target has both value and premium private brands. Target uses “Up & Up” for its value private label products and “Archer Farms” for its premium private label food products. The three product categories that we picked are household products, health products, and food products.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Natureview Case Analysis

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Natureview Farm is the leading manufacturer of refrigerated cup yogurt in the natural foods channel. From its founding in 1989 through 1999, Natureview grew its revenues from less than $100,000 to over $13M by selling only 8oz and 32oz yogurt cups. However, in 1997, in order to fund strategic investments, Natureview received an equity infusion from a venture capital firm, which needs to cash out of its investment, forcing Natureview to either find a new investor or position itself for acquisition. In either case, growth is needed, and revenues need to be increased from $13M to $20M by the end of 2001. The question is how. As such, the core problem facing Natureview is whether or not to expand beyond the natural foods stores channel and into the supermarket channel and how such a decision will impact its supply chain operations.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Big Three has spent large amount of money on advertising to establish brand recognition and to promote sales. By paying grocers “slotting allowance”, the Big Three gain shelf space advantage over private label brands. However with the prosperity of drug stores, convenience store, discounted retailer such as Wal-Mart that do not charge “slotting allowance”, private label brands gained equal opportunities of brand demonstration, which results to 3.6% growth up to 9.2% market share in three years. The capital required is very high to establish production line, to advertise and to pay wages. Another reason why the entry barrier is high is the technology. The R&D accounts for one percent of gross sales, higher than food industry. The Big Three has competitive advantage of new product development and existing product improvement.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past decade there have been drastic shifts in the economy with significant effects in the retail market. Consumers were cutting back on spending to make sure their hard earned dollars were accounted for, although the economy is doing much better today the effects of penny pinching can still be seen. Private labels, brands that are owned by retailers and are not national (Peckenpaugh, 2014), are thriving more than ever in today’s market. A private label offers consumers the same quality for a lower price than premium brands.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The worldwide aspartame market has enjoyed patent protected financial prosperity since the early 1980’s. In 1986 the world demand for aspartame was 5,730 tons annually with future projected world demand reaching 10,000 tons annually, a 75% increase over 1986 demand. The Monsanto Corporation, the current owner of the rights to manufacture aspartame, under the brand name NutraSweet (NS), reported 1986 sales of $711 million. The estimated ROA was approximately 8%.1 With this being such an attractive industry, companies like Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) needed to determine whether or not to compete in the aspartame business. This paper will first analyze NS’s case for accommodating or deterring entry before turning to a discussion as to which strategy NS will actually choose. Given the above analysis the paper will briefly address what Holland Sweetener Company’s entry strategy should be. There are several industry factors that will affect how this game is played. First, the two versions of aspartame, as produced by HSC and NS, are relatively identical goods. This leaves the consumer indifferent to product attributes and only concerned with price. It is also assumed that geography is not a real strategic factor since shipping costs are so low. The shipping costs for a pound of aspartame average 15-20 cents.2 Compared to the 1986 market price of $70 per pound shipping costs only account for 0.002% of the market price, hardly a significant factor of concern even given NS’s large volume. Lesson 1 of game theory suggests, “you must [first] understand the payoffs and objectives of the other parties you are interacting with.”3 Therefore the next two sections explore NS’s potential objectives regarding competitor entry strategy. Thinking Ahead Reasoning backwards: Reasons for Accommodation It may seem counter intuitive why a monopolist would even consider accommodating a…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of their low-cost structure, private labels could afford to give 3% margin more than branded cereals to retailers. Higher margins led to heavy promotions of private labels by retailer.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Few brands enjoy high levels of consumer loyalty and in certain sectors, such as cereals, bread and yoghurt, it is particularly limited. As a result, product switching and the growth of own labels are harming sales of some brands.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over time private labels have shed the stigma acquired when they were specifically marketed as inferior goods. Consumer perception of these products has undergone a substantial shift. Now the majority of consumers do not think there is any real distinction between such products and the national brands in terms of the quality. The aim of this project is to examine this phenomenon, looking at the theories that underlie the change in consumer perception, the transformation of the marketing…

    • 6450 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Cadbury acquired Crush in 1989 they discovered that Crush was available in markets that represented only 62% of orange category sales due to Proctor & Gamble’s decision to distribute its product through warehouses rather than bottlers. This decision caused many bottlers to look elsewhere for business and lead to a decrease in the number of bottlers that distributed the brand. Looking at Tables 1 and 2 which look at market shares and market coverage of orange carbonated drinks from 1985 to 1989 it is apparent that there is a positive correlation between the two.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics