INTEGRATED INNOVATION MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Nader NADA1
Abstract: Through our literature review we realized that the full implementation of innovation framework in many organizations does not appear to take place routinely within management practice and that, where it does, it tends to focus on output measures. Further, from the relatively small number of empirical studies of frameworks in practice, measurement of innovation management appears to be undertaken infrequently as an ad hoc approach, and relies on outdated innovation frameworks. In this paper we introducing an integrated and comprehensive framework that addresses the innovation management at both levels of the firms and projects. We developed a synthesized innovation management framework that consists of eight dimensions including the Innovation Balanced Scorecard (IBS) to measure four categories of innovation Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Open Innovation, and Commercialization. The paper makes two important contributions. First, it takes a step of incorporating a vastly diverse innovation framework into a single framework with several newly added dimensions. Second, we introduced and partially developed the innovation framework toolkit. Through the systematic implementation and usage of the framework toolkit, practitioners will be able to conduct an evaluation of their own innovation management activity, identify gaps, weaknesses or inadequacies, and also improvement potential. Keywords: Creativity, Innovation, Framework, Innovation Balanced Scorecard, KM
1. Introduction If knowledge management is to have any real impact on the way we do business and not just a passing fad then it has got to be about making radical changes in the way that we perceive and utilize knowledge. It needs to be about creating new knowledge, applying knowledge and in the words of Peter Drucker “making it productive” (2002). In other words knowledge management needs to fundamentally focus on
References: Adams, R., et.al, “Innovation Management Measurement” A Review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 1, 21–47. Burgelman, R.A., Christensen, C.M. and Wheelwright, S.C. (2004). “Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, 4th edition.” New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin. Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P. and Voss, A. (1996). “Development of a technical innovation audit.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 105–136. 52 The Knowledge Economy Cooper, R.G. (2008): “Perspective: The Stage-Gate® Idea-to-Launch Process – Update, What’s New, and NextGen Systems”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 25, Issue 3, p. 213-232. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1995). “Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 374–391. Cordero, R. (1990). “The measurement of innovation performance in the firm:” an overview. Research Policy, 19, 185–192. Cormican, K. and O’Sullivan, D. (2004). “Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management.” Technovation, 24, 819–829. Peter F. Drucker, “The Discipline of Innovation,” Best of HBR,” August 2002, Product 3480, Reprint Number R0208F. Fagerberg, J. et al. (2006). Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press. Frenkel, A., Maital, S. and Grupp, H. (2000). Measuring dynamic technical change: a technometric approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 20, 429–441. Hall, D.L. and Nauda, A. (1990). An interactive approach for selecting IR&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37, 126–133. Holbrook, A. and Wolfe, D. (2002), Knowledge, Clusters and Regional Innovation: Economic Development in Canada, Montréal, Published for the School of Policy Studies, Queen 's University by McGill-Queen 's University Press. Jones, A. (2008). “The Innovation Acid Test, Axminster:” Triarchy Press. Goffin, K. and Pfeiffer, R. (1999). “Innovation Management in UK and German Manufacturing Companies.” London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992). “The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance.” Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71–79. Kustoff, R (2008), “What is Organizational Innovation, Ezine Articles. Retrieved from” http://ezinearticles.com/?What-is-Organizational-Innovation? &type=sv&id= 1573028 Lam, A. (2006), “Organizational Innovation,” Ch5, Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University. Mietzner, D. et al.(2009), “Innovation Management Model (IMM),” MS Class Notes, University of Potsdam. Nada, N. et al. (2010), “An Integrated Innovation Management Framework,” Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Izmir University, 2010. O’Sullivan, D. and Dooley, L. (2009), “Applying Innovation,” Sage Publications, Inc. Pugh, S. (1981) Concept selection: “a method that works. In: Hubka, V. (ed.), Review of design methodology.” Proceedings international conference on engineering design, March 1981, Rome. Zürich: Heurista, 1981, blz. 497 – 506. Rohit Talwar: “Designing Your Future,” ASAE & The Center for Association Leadership, 2008. Simon, H. (1969). “The Sciences of the Artificial.” Cambridge: MIT Press. Skyrme, D. (2008), Skyrme Associated. Retrieved from http://www.skyrme.com/resource/kmbasics.htm Teece, D. J. (1998). “Design issues for innovative firms: bureaucracy, incentives and industrial structure”. The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization and Regions. O. Solvell. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). “A penny for your quotes – patent citations and the value of innovations.” Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 172–187. Verhaeghe, A. and Kfir, R. (2002). “Managing innovation in a knowledge intensive technology organization (KITO)”. R&D Management,” 32, 409–417. Werner, B.M. and Souder, W.E. (1997). “Measuring R&D performance – state of the art.” ResearchTechnology Management, 40, 34–42. 53