Preview

Innovation: Teece and Exploring the Core Components of Dynamic Capabilities

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Innovation: Teece and Exploring the Core Components of Dynamic Capabilities
Exploring the Core Components of Dynamic Capabilities

Abstract

The concept of dynamic capabilities was introduced by Teece & Pisano (1994) and Teece, Pisano, & Shuen (1997)who asserted that in a dynamic environment a firm’s competitive advantage will rest on the firm’s internal processes and routines that enable the firm to renew and change its stock of organizational capabilities thereby making it possible to deliver a constant stream of new and innovative products and services to customers. Capabilities are complex bundles of skills and knowledge that are exercised through organizational processes. Capabilities thus describe the effectiveness in undertaking processes relative to the competition (Nelson & Winter, 1982), and the literature has also shown a close link between capabilities and their underlying processes (Sambamurthy, Bharadwaj, & Grover, 2003; Tecce, 2007; Wnag & Amhed, 2007).

A fundamental issue for researchers and managers is to understand and leverage dynamic capabilities – the ability to reconfigure operational competencies to address turbulent environments. However, previous porter has viewed dynamic capabilities have been viewed as abstract phenomena with no set prossesses therefore hard, virtually impossible to the competitor to replicate. To enable managers to leverage dynamic capabilities, this research proposes a set of core components to capture the effectiveness in undertaking the key processes of dynamic capabilities, in terms of effectively undertaking the reconfiguration process. Which are sensing capability, absorptive capability, integrative capability and innovative capability. Finally, some implications for managers are also discussed.

Keywords: dynamic capabilities, core components of dynamic capabilities, firm performance.

INTRODUCTION

How firms create and sustain competitive advantage is the fundamental issue in the field of strategic management(Rumelt, Schendel, & Teece, 1994; Zott, 2003). The



References: Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33-46. Bain, J. S. (1959). Industrial Organization. Wiley, New York. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. Barney, J. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643-650. Bierly, P. E. & Chakrabarti, A. K.. (1996). Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43: 368-380. Blyler M. & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 677-686. Chang, H. R. & Hou, J. J. (2007). Organizational change and dynamic capabilities; A case of high-tech company. Industrial Forum, 9 (1), 15-29. Cohen, M. A., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152. Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (1999). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 211-229. Delmas, M. A. (1999). Exposing strategic assets to create new competencies: The case of technological acquisition in the waste management industry in Europe and North America. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8, 635-650. Dosi, G., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2000). Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. in. Dosi, G., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (Eds.) (2000). The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Dutta S., Narasimhan, O. & Rajiv, S. (2003). Conceptualization and measuring capability: methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 667-686. Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105-1121. Ethiraj S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V.. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? a study in the software service industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 25-45. Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombination in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1193-1201. George, G. (2005). Learning to be capable: patenting and licensing at the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation 1925–2002. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 119-151. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7 (4), 375-388. Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3), 597-606. Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarily and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (5), 339-360. Ho, Y. C., & Tsai, T. H. (2006). The impact of dynamic capabilities with market orientation and resource-based approaches on NPD project performance. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8 (1), 215-228. Iansiti, M. and K. B. Clark. (1994). Integration and dynamics capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 557-605. King, A. A., & Tucci, C. L. (2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Science, 48 (2), 171-186. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7 (5), 502-518. Lazonick, W., & Prencipe, A. (2005). Dynamic capabilities and sustained innovation: Strategic control and financial commitment at Rolls-Royce Plc. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 501-542. Leonard-Barton D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal. 13: 111-125. Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion, Journal of World Business, 35 (4), 355-378. Mahoney, J. & Pandian, J. (1992). The Resource-based View within The Conversation of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 363-380. Mason, E. (1949). The current state of the monopoly problem in the U.S., Harvard Law Review, 62, pp. 1265–1285. Menguc, B. & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (1), 63-73. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Newbert, S. L. (2005). New firm formation: a dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 43 (1), 55-77. Okhuysen, G. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13 (4), 370-386. Pan, S., Pan, G. M. & Hsieh, H. (2006). A dual-level analysis of the capability development process: a case study of TT&T. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13): 1814-1829. Pavlou, H. (2004). IT-enabled dynamic capabilities in the new product development: Building a competitive advantage in the turbulent environments. doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of th Firm. Basil Blackwell, London. Petroni, A. (1998). The analysis of dynamic capabilities in a competence-oriented organization. Technovation, 18(3): 179-189 Pettus, M Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press: New York. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp. 79–91. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 22-40. Roy, P., & Roy, P. (2004). The Hewlett Packard–Compaq computers merger: Insight from the resource-based view and the dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5 (1/ 2), 7-14. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D.,& Teece, D. (1994). Strategic management and economics, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 5-29. Salvatos, C. (2003). The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (1), 83-108. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. S., & Grover V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27 (2), 237-263. Sanchez, R. (2004). Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence. Journal of Business Research, 57(5): 518-532. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper, New York. Shapiro, C. (1989). The theory of business strategy. RAND Journal of Economics, 20(1), 125–137. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350. Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (3), 537-556. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18 (7), 509-533. Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6 (2), 341-377. Verona, G., & Ravasi, D. (2003). Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 577-606. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (4), 303-313. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (1), 31-51. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5 (2), 171-180. Wheeler, B. C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Information Systems Research, 13 (2), 125-146. Winter, S. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24:10, 991-995. Woiceshyn, J., & Daellenbach, U. (2005). Integrative capability and technology adoption: evidence from oil firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (2), 307-342. Zollo, M. & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13: 339-351. Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (2), 97-125.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Holden australia

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lisboa, A., Skarmeas, D., & Lages, C. (2011). Innovative capabilities: Their drivers and effects on current and future performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1157-1161.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What are the three distinct classes of homes in the tenement houses? In what ways does each reflect the needs and resources of the renters?…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kwanzaa

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kwanzaa is a cultural holiday that is celebrated by African American as they honor the African heritage. Kwanzaa was created to ratify and restore out rootedness in African Culture. Kwanza is Swahili for “first” which derived from the Swahili phrase “Matunda Ya Kwanzaa” which means “first fruit”. In 1966, during the civil rights movement Dr. Maulana Karenga introduced the Kwanzaa festival to the United States.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ulrich, D., & Lake, D. (1991). Organizational Capability: Creating Competitive Advantage. The Executive , 77-92.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hoopes, d, Madsen, T & Walker, G. ‘Guest Editors Introduction to the Special Issue: Why is there a Resourced-Based View? Toward a Theory of Competitive Advantage.’ Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp 889-902. (2003)…

    • 2493 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Resourceing Talent

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Bibliography: Barney, J (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol 17, pp 99-120…

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: BARNEY, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Are Capabilities?

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to create capabilities, there are three approaches that firms can use as a framework. First, capability as resources: this includes obtaining more finance, how and where to obtain more staff; capital works, procuring up-to-date equipment, training, compliance and management procedures. Second, capabilities as integration abilities: this includes partnerships/alliances, new HR practices to extend individuals, performance management, working in industry, changing organizational structures and management leadership. Third, capability as innovative learning processes: this includes innovation, taking risks, allowing mistakes, continuous improvement and renewal, learning culture, self-managed/cross-functional teams, knowledge generation at all levels and leadership at all levels. In general, it is integration that presents greatest challenge. For example, Johnson & Johnson obtains finance on their R&D and trains new professional experts for their new products invention; then they oversee the production and marketing of pharmaceutical and medical goods as well as consumer hygiene and beauty products; finally they receive the feedback from customers and make innovation and improvement to their…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Strategic management Tesco

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 275-292.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dynamic Capability

    • 11545 Words
    • 47 Pages

    This paper focuses on dynamic capabilities and, more generally, the resource-based view of the firm. We argue that dynamic capabilities are a set of specific and identifiable processes such as product development, strategic decision making, and alliancing. They are neither vague nor tautological. Although dynamic capabilities are idiosyncratic in their details and path dependent in their emergence, they have significant commonalities across firms (popularly termed ‘best practice’). This suggests that they are more homogeneous, fungible, equifinal, and substitutable than is usually assumed. In moderately dynamic markets, dynamic capabilities resemble the traditional conception of routines. They are detailed, analytic, stable processes with predictable outcomes. In contrast, in high-velocity markets, they are simple, highly experiential and fragile processes with unpredictable outcomes. Finally, well-known learning mechanisms guide the evolution of dynamic capabilities. In moderately dynamic markets, the evolutionary emphasis is on variation. In high-velocity markets, it is on selection. At the level of RBV, we conclude that traditional RBV misidentifies the locus of long-term competitive advantage in dynamic markets, overemphasizes the strategic logic of leverage, and reaches a boundary condition in high-velocity markets. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.…

    • 11545 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    study of Cisco Systems, develops a conceptual model of the firm as an innovation engine.…

    • 9070 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles.Strategic Management Journal, 24( 1 0), 997- 1010.…

    • 8928 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper is about facing changes and how companies survive in this continuing process of innovation.There is one definition in the focus of this article: Ambidexterity. This is the capability of an enterprise to explore and exploit at the same time. There are two sides of argumentation in the research on organizational change. One that discusses adaptation and another arguing that if the competitive landscape changes, inactive organizational structures are replaced by new ones that suits more to the changes in the environment. Companies should think about to explore new strategies and sections, while they are also exploiting their own actual capabilities. As seen in the case study of Polaroid, strategic contradictions could have been resolved by the senior managers, but they just sticked to exploitation of their original products and did not support the exploration of new technologies in a time of environmental change. Leadership and management are directing a company and their decisions are of most importance for a company‘s success. Efficiency and innovation don‘t need to be strategic tradeoffs, but they can complement each other.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalk, G Jnr., Evans, P. and Schulman, LE. 1992. "Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy". Harvard Business Review, Vol.70, No. 2, March-April, pp. 57-70.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of dynamic capabilities, as discussed above, is sleek and attractive. However, the association of dynamic capabilities only with routines is questionable, as Teece (2012) has briefly commented concerning the entrepreneurial action. It is reasonable to assume that routines or processes are the codification of a former knowledge. However, having a bunch of routines or processes does not mean that the company is able to gain more competitiveness. The main issue is the creation of new knowledge and capabilities that leads to new value creation or capture, not the stock of the existing ones. Routines can be considered as a coded knowledge; yet, there are other forms of knowledge, and knowledge coded outside routines (technical sheets, design memories, etc.). Nonaka (1991) points out the coding of tacit skills (knowledge) into explicit one. Jensen et al. (2007),…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays