Preview

Insider Trading

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Insider Trading
Abstract:
"Insider trading" is a term that most investors have heard and usually associate with illegal conduct. But the term actually includes both legal and illegal conduct. Every day, investors have the opportunity to put their money into more than 15,000 U.S. stocks. It should come as no surprise to anyone that insider trading occurs every day in the stock market. In 1934 the U.S. Congress enacted the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to protect corporate investors, it realized that corporate investors had an unfair advantage when trading there own companies shares. What might surprise investors is that insider trading is done every day with full knowledge and sanction of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The activity we are referring to is the trading by directors and executives in their own companies' shares. However, obvious abuses by corporate insiders such as purchasing large amounts of shares just before their company is acquired at a premium, is still considered illegal. Insider trading allegations cause the general public to lose faith in what they thought was a stable and secure financial industry. If large investors can act on information that smaller investors do not have, the playing field is not level.

Insider Trading The first step for the U.S. Congress of 1934 was to develop a definition of "insider." "The SEC had to know whom to police, and the people being watched over needed to know that they were now expected to play by new rules"(Moreland,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Class Make up Case Brie1

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rule of Law: The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report agency misconduct. (www.wikipedia.org/whistleblower.com). The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act calls for whistleblowing in the context of publicly traded…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "In 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Martha Stewart was under investigation for insider trading. She had sold 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems in December 2001, just before the Food & Drug Administration announced that it was scuttling ImClone's application to sell a new so-called wonder drug. It looked like classic insider trading, and it probably was, but oddly the feds never proved this in court, or even tried to prove it. Instead, they charged Stewart with four crimes (conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statements to federal agents), all stemming from her conversations with investigators. A jury found her guilty, and she was sentenced to five months in prison. Under federal law,…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Acct 504 Case Study 2

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to 2002 the necessary steps were not required. Congress addressed concern at growing corporate fraud with the introduction of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley Act seeks to govern publicly traded companies and created auditing standards most specifically addressed are internal control audits.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, the theory behind the prohibiting insider trading is that is undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the securities markets. The SEC claims that finding…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 250 Week 4 Disc1

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1985 R. Foster Winans a columnist for “The Wall Street Journal” was convicted of giving information to two stock brokers he was writing and article about in his column “Heard On The Street. Foster was charged with insider trading. The stockbrokers make a whopping 690,000 and Winans cut was 31,000. I thin k this case does meet the requirements of inside trading established by the Supreme Court in the case U.S. vs. O’Hagen because the Foster leaked information about contents of a column , “Heard on the Street” before publication. The leaks allowed his stockbroker friends to make trades in anticipation of the impact the column would have and allow them to make a profit before the new hit the street. According to Lawrence inside trading is A person who trades on information that he or she knew was supposed to be confidential is guilty of misappropriation, regardless of whether the trader is directly connected to the company whose shares were purchased. This new law covers anyone who learned and traded on information they knew was illegal. It does not cover people who come across information just by chance…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress responded by enacting the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), which became effective on July 30, 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley makes many changes in the securities regulation process to improve corporate governance and reporting. It imposes harsh penalties on violators, creates an elaborate system for governing and regulating auditors for public companies, and requires the securities industry’s self-regulatory organizations to adopt rules to prevent conflicts of interest and enhance the independence of securities analysts. Even casual observers of the political reaction to the stunning disclosures about Enron, WorldCom and Tyco’s deceitful financial practices might have predicted some such legislative response (Jennings, 2010, p. 212).…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Busn 115 Week 1 Analysis

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the United States, the public capital markets are controlled basically by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The laws that helps and provides the SEC the permission to define the form and content of the financial reports filed with the Commission. The SEC is accountable for administering federal securities laws written to give protection for investors. (Skousen, K. Fred, 1991). At the beginning of the 21st century, the finding of accounting malpractices among many popular American companies bought demand for SEC activities. However, in 1934 the federal agency established to accomplish the provisions of the SEC Act and to safeguard…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    directors, etc… Although it is said that he did not hold part in insider trading, his leak…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martha Stewart Scandal

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When most people hear the term “insider trading” they think of the illegal version. However, the term “insider trading” can also mean the perfectly legal buying and selling of stock by a company’s corporate insiders. Insider trading is legal when these corporate insiders trade stock of their own company and report these trades to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). That way the insider trading is not kept a secret and anyone can find out a corporate insider’s opinion of his or her company.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This tip which broke the confidentiality policy of the brokerage company led to the subsequent sale of Martha’s shares in the ImClone company during the latter company’s blackout period with the effects of causing the share price of ImClone’s share to drop and the share price of shares of the Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia to drop after the scandal broke that Martha had engaged in insider trading. Through a series of events, she, her broker and his assistant…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The SEC defines insider trading as illegal to either buy or sell shares, equity shares or any class of equity shares, in any public company if you are in possession of material non-public information. It’s safe to say that Waksal was in possession of material non-public information, where the question lies is whether or not Stewart was. When approached with the information that the founder of ImClone was selling all their shares, it can mean one thing and one thing only – shit’s about to hit the fan and you want out as quickly as possible. Had Stewart not have been informed about the Waksal family selling their ImClone shares through Bacanovic, she probably would not have made a rash decision and instructed Faneuil to sell all her shares in the company. There is no doubt whatsoever that Waksal was in possession of “material insider information”, it was Bacanovics relay of information to Stewart that put her in risk. She was not aware of all the information regarding the sudden sell of ImClone shares by the Waksals. As a result of not being fully informed of the situation she was unable to make an informed calculated decision. Stewart was not aware why Sam Waksal was selling, and she was unaware of the FDA drug rejection on Erbitux that was about to take place. More…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act o

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several laws and regulations have been developed to attempt to control business practices. Corporations must follow rules that were established to protect the public from fraud such as fair practice laws, and regulatory agencies must ensure compliance with these long-standing regulations. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, (SEC), “was developed to help protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital information” (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2015). The SEC was created in 1934 in response to the loss of public confidence in financial markets after the stock market crash of 1929 and the years following the Great Depression. The main goal of establishing the SEC was to restore investor confidence in the markets by providing more precise and reliable information for investors and creating an environment that protected the investor first. Both public and private investors can invest in corporations, and the SEC requires disclosure of meaningful financial information so that those investors can make sound investment decisions (U.S. Securities and Exchange…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I picked this article because of how it relates to this class; insider trading is something we have discussed in past lectures. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was put into play to fule over and secure exchanges, brokers, dealers, etc. Within this act, rule number 10(b)-5 was put into play to prevent insider trading. Insider trading meaning purchases or sales occurred based on information that was not yet made public. Under this rule the information which affected the decision to conduct business must result in material to be found guilty of insider trading. Meaning, the business act had to be worth a significant loss or gain by either party involved. The main purpose of this rule was to prevent future forecasts of any business because predictions may affect buying or selling of shares and prediction may be inaccurate. Also both parties in this article are held liable under the misappropriation theory; the theory that holds the parties liable of their actions in these…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martha Stewart case

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Insider trading is an illegal activity that is believed to raise the cost of capital for securities issuers, therefore decreasing economic growth. It’s an illegal action that can be used by greedy individuals in order to avoid potential losses, or to make substantial gains without the information first being released to the public. Martha Stewart, who is a representative of successful woman, has a strong business in the United States. However, after her scandal blown out, her image was totally destroyed. Some people scold her to wear the mask, and some people scold her was a big swindler. Basically, the scandal of Martha Stewart was caused by a phone call from her old friend and also her stock account manager, Peter Bacanovic.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rubbermaid

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First of all, investors are higher on the ladder than employees. They have almost the same amount of power that the managers at companies have, if not more. An example of this was when Enron’s managers manipulated earnings and avoided regulation by using complex financial instruments and engineering. This happened because the shareholder’s had lost control of the company’s managers, who then lost control of the employees. Many corporations need capital from equity investors to be able to grow and progress. Second, even though both employees and investors had income coming in from the company, it was for different reasons. Investors were investing to make money off money. Employees, on the other hand, were working hard physically to make money (from hard work not from money) so they would be able to have a roof over their head and food to eat. And third, investors were lied to and had things hidden from them. Both Enron and WorldCom were companies that had lied to investors. Enron told investors they had made $1.8 billion, when in reality it was quite the opposite: they told IRS they had lost a billion (p 210). WorldCom on the other hand, reported no loss but over exaggerated about their earnings. Enron also hid the fact that they were trading natural-gas and electricity derivatives. Employees were not…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics