Preview

Integrating Fuzzy Delphi with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification Golam Kabir1

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5391 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Integrating Fuzzy Delphi with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification Golam Kabir1
Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management 2013, 3(1), 22-34

Integrating Fuzzy Delphi with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification
Golam Kabir1 and Razia Sultana Sumi2
1

PhD Student, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. Email: gk.raju@yahoo.com (corresponding author). 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Stamford University, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Email: sumi2681@yahoo.com
Production Management Received March 7, 2012; revisions April 3, 2012; April 6, 2012; accepted April 12, 2012 Available online June 25, 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract: A systematic approach to the inventory control and classification may have a significant influence on company competitiveness. In practice, all inventories cannot be controlled with equal attention. In order to efficiently control the inventory items and to determine the suitable ordering policies for them, multiple criteria inventory classification is used. In this paper, a systematic and logical approach is structured for multiple criteria inventory classification through integrating Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Fuzzy Delphi method used to identify the most important and significant criteria and, Fuzzy AHP is used to determine the relative weights of the attributes or criteria, and to classify inventories into different categories. To accredit the proposed model, it is implemented for the 351 raw materials of switch gear section of Energypac Engineering Limited (EEL), a large power engineering company of Bangladesh. Implementation results show that the proposed method can be used in inventory classification. Keywords: Multicriteria inventory classification, Fuzzy Delphi Method, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, triangular fuzzy number.



References: Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B., and Mukherjee, S.K. (2007). Distance-based consensus method for ABC analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(15), 3405-3420. Boender, C.G.E., de Graan, J.G., and Lootsma, F.A. (1989). Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29(2), 133-143. Björnfot, A. and Torjussen, L. (2012). Extent and Effect of Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration among Construction SME. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2(1), 47-55. Bozbura, F.T., Beskese, A., and Kahraman, C. (2007). Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1100-1112. Braglia, M., Grassi, A., and Montanari, R. (2004). Multiattribute classification method for spare parts inventory management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10 (1), 55-65. Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247. Cakir, O. and Canbolat, M.S. (2008). A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 35( 3), 1367-1378. Cebi, F., Kahraman, C. and Bolat, B. (2010). A multiattribute ABC classification model using fuzzy AHP. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Awaji, Japan, 25-28. Chang, D.Y. (1992). Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1, 352-355. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655. Chase, R.B., Jacobs, F. R., Aquilano, N.J., and Agarwal, N.K. (2006). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. 11th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, USA. Chen, Y., Li, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., and Hipel, K.W. (2008). A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 35(3), 776-796. Chen, Y. and Qu, L. (2006). Evaluating the Selection of Logistics Centre Location Using Fuzzy MCDM Model Based on Entropy Weight. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Dalian, China. Chu, C.W., Liang, G.S., and Liao, C.T. (2008). Controlling inventory by combining ABC analysis and fuzzy classification. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 55(4), 841-851. Csutora, R. and Buckley, J.J. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The Lambda-Max Method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 120, 181-195.    Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2013, 3(1), 22-34 Integrating Fuzzy Delphi with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification 33 Flores, B.E. and Whybark, D.C. (1986). Multiple Criteria ABC Analysis. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 6(3), 38-46. Flores, B.E. and Whybark, D.C. (1987). Implementing Multiple Criteria ABC Analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 7(1), 79-84. Flores, B.E., Olson, D.L., and Dorai, V.K. (1992). Management of Multicriteria Inventory Classification. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 16(12), 71-82. Gumus, A.T. (2009). Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4067-4074. Gupta, R., Sachdeva, A., and Bhardwaj, A. (2010). Selection of 3pl Service Provider using Integrated Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, II, San Francisco, USA. Guvenir, H.A. and Erel, E. (1998). Multicriteria inventory classification using a genetic algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 105(1), 29-37. Hadi-Vencheh, A. (2010). An improvement to multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3), 962-965. Hadi-Vencheh, A. and Mohamadghasemi, A. (2011). A fuzzy AHP-DEA approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3346-3352. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., and Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241-253. Jamshidi, H. and Jain, A. (2008). Multi-Criteria ABC Inventory Classification: With Exponential Smoothing Weights. Journal of Global Business Issues, Winter issue. Kabir, G. (2011). Fuzzy AHP for Contractor Evaluation in Project Management-A Case Study. International Journal of Business and Information Technology, 1(1), 85-96. Kabir, G. and Hasin, M.A.A. (2011). Evaluation of Customer Oriented Success Factors in Mobile Commerce Using Fuzzy AHP. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 361-386. Kutlu, A.C. and Ekmekçioglu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSISbased fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61-67. Lei, Q.S., Chen, J., and Zhou, Q. (2005). Multiple criteria inventory classification based on principal components analysis and neural network. Proceedings of Advances in neural networks, 1058-1063, Berlin. Liu, Q. and Huang, D. (2006). Classifying ABC Inventory with Multicriteria Using a Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA '06), 1, 1185-1190, Jian, China. Meixner, O. (2009). Fuzzy AHP Group Decision Analysis and Its Application for the Evaluation of Energy Sources 2. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Multi-criteria Decision Making, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 1-14. Mikhailov, L. (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3), 365-385. Muller, M. (2003). Essentials of Inventory Management. American Management Association, New York, USA. Nahmias, S. (2004). Production and Operations Analysis. 5th Edition, Irwin/McGraw Hill, Burr Ridge, IL, USA, 213-215. Ng, W.L. (2007). A simple classifier for multiple criteria ABC analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 344-353. Noorderhaben, N. (1995). Strategic decision making. Addison-Wesley, UK. Partovi, F. Y. and Burton, J. (1993). Using the analytic hierarchy process for ABC analysis. International Journal of Production and Operations Management, 13(9), 29-44. Partovi, F.Y. and Anandarajan, M. (2002). Classifying inventory using and artificial neural network approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41(4), 389-404. Ramanathan, R. (2006). ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 33(3), 695-700. Rao, R.V. (2007). Decision making in the manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer-Verlag, London. Rezaei, J. (2007). A Fuzzy Model for Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification. Analysis of Manufacturing Systems, 167-172. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Saaty, T.L. (1998). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. Simunovic, K., Simunovic, G. and Saric, T. (2009). Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Multiple Criteria Inventory Classification. Strojarstvo, 51(4), 313-321. Tang, Y.C. and Beynon, M.J. (2009). Group decisionmaking within capital investment: a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process approach with developments. International Journal of Operational Research, 4(1), 75-96. Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., and Xu, D.L. (2005). A twostage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 152, 475-498. Xu, R. (2000). Fuzzy least square priority method in the analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 395-404. Yu, M.C. (2011). Multi-criteria ABC analysis using artificial-intelligence-based classification techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3416-3421. Zhou, P. and Fan, L. (2007). A note on multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using weighted linear optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3), 1488-1491.    Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2013, 3(1), 22-34 34 G. Kabir and R. S. Sumi Golam Kabir is a PhD student in the Civil Engineering Department of Faculty of Applied Science at The University of British Columbia (UBC), Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. Mr. Kabir was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Production Engineering (IPE) at Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). He received a B.Sc. and a M.Sc. in Industrial and Production Engineering from BUET in 2009 and 2011 respectively. His main scientific interest concentrates on multi criteria decision analysis under risk and uncertainty, fuzzy inference system and decision support system. He has a large number of international journal publications in his credit. Razia Sultana Sumi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Business Administration at Stamford University Bangladesh. She received BBA and MBA in Marketing Department from Dhaka University, Bangladesh. Her research interests are marketing research, productivity improvement and decision science.    Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2013, 3(1), 22-34

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Busi 650-ILP Final

    • 3605 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Chen, J. (2012). Multiple criteria ABC inventory classification using two virtual items. International Journal Of Production Research, 50(6), 1702-1713.…

    • 3605 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hrm 531 Week 4 Paper

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper, we will be looking at three different scenarios in order to understand and implement different decision models.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 630 Week 2

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Auerbach Enterprises is an air conditioning company who manufactures air conditioners for automobiles and trucks. Their business provides these products across North America. In evaluating the type of costing method Auerbach Enterprises would benefit from the most, they fall into job order costing system due to the variety of auto and truck air conditioning units they manufacture. Their manufacturing of the units varies as they specialize in unique and individual orders in order to meet the demands of their customers. Their products which have portions of their order which can be assembled in mass still require individualization to fit the distinct trucks or automobiles. In evaluating the cost of the product and analyzing profitability it is important to apply the job order costing system. Each item must be categorized as the direct and indirect labor and manufacturing costs will vary with each output. “Determining the accurate cost of a product is necessary for finding optimal pricing for that product and, more importantly, whether that product can be profitable.” (Tatikonda, 1988). Tatikonda goes on to discuss that accurate inventory is vital to the survival of any organization. Accurate inventory is required in order for management to make the best business decision recommendations to the owners and CEO’s of the organization.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inventory stratification is a specific business process under the inventory management subgroup in the stock process of 7S. Like most processes there is a common, good, and best practice for inventory stratification. Inventory stratification which includes the GMROII (gross margin return on inventory investment) method of A, B, C, D, X and Y items is considered best practice. A, B, C, and D represent items in inventory ranked by percentage of profitability from higher profitability down to zero profitability respectively. X and Y represent items with zero inventories, X represents items with gross margin dollars and Y represents items without any gross margin dollars. GMROII focuses on the items profitability making it a financial driver and is considered best practice. However, for optimal inventory stratification solutions, the final rank should include a combination method of the GMROII method; sales volume method – representative of customer-centric…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Mat 540

    • 6375 Words
    • 26 Pages

    COURSE DESCRIPTION Applies quantitative methods to systems management (Decision Theory), and/or methods of decision-making with respect to sampling, organizing, and analyzing empirical data. MAT540 Student Version 1122 (11-29-2011) Final Page 1 of 19…

    • 6375 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Task List: MGMT600-1204B-03 : Applied Managerial Decision-Making. (2012). Retrieved December 16, 2012, from Colorado Technical University Online: https://campus.ctuonline.edu/pages/MainFrame.aspx?ContentFrame=/Default.aspx…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this report, process and results of this case study is presented. In this first part, problem which is going to be studied is presented. Following that, decision criteria and performance measures are given in order to evaluate results. Then, assumptions are made considering the business environment and an iterative process of combining quantitative and qualitative measures is conducted. Finally, conclusion about the report is submitted as the past part of the report.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    This paper analysis and discusses the supply chain process of Crocs Inc. in a competitive and dynamic footwear industry. I used AHP model (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to illustrate my decision in choosing Crocs among other global brands in foot industry.…

    • 2859 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is, in fact, the only known multi-criteria decision-making model that can measure consistency in a decision maker(s) judgement. This measure is very important since all quality decisions are consistent. AHP is easily implemented through the use of expert choice – a decision-support system program developed for AHP. Through the use of expert choice to implement stakeholders weight assignments, the results presented in Table II, were obtained. Figure 2.…

    • 6625 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deere Company

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Optimizing inventory in complex supply chain is challenging. Due to this increase in competition the profit margin of the companies are goes on decreasing as a result of which every company now a days focusing on reducing inventory by investing in enterprise planning and execution system but continue to face inventory problems. Establishing a sustainable inventory optimization system is not simple. In addition to that, time-varying demands caused by seasonality, product life cycles and time-varying capacities caused by expanding plants, introducing new processes and technologies, holidays and schedule shutdowns make setting the reliable inventory targets difficult.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Decision Analysis Study

    • 6839 Words
    • 20 Pages

    This technique is used because of its importance. There are two very basic models used for decision analysis - decision tables and decision trees. This module contains a model for a general decision table; a model for entering a decision tree in tabular form; an exciting, new model with a graphical user interface for decision trees; and a model for creating a decision table for demand/supply or one period inventory situations. The decision tree model presented is important it shows the validity of the project. It is easy to understand the reliability and validity of the project.…

    • 6839 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public Admin

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Six Analytical Techniques to Decision Making Cost-Benefit Analysis Multiobjective Models Decision Analysis System Analysis Group Decision-Making Techniques…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    personal planning

    • 1369 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Strategic decisions need to incorporate tangible,intangible,strategic,and operational factors into any analysis.A methodology that allows for the synthesis of these factors and helps management structure the decision problem can prove to be a valuable resource.This article presents a framework that effectively considers these issues in the strategic evaluation of suppliers.The framework is based on the Analytical Network Process(ANP)(Saaty 1996).ANP is a generalized form of the more popular multiattribute decisionmaking tool,the Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)(Saaty 1980).…

    • 1369 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The model presented here proposes metrics for each driver by aggregating data gathered by different methods. The combination of the different driver values is conducted through multi criteria analysis based on fuzzy measure, to ensure that the resulting index preserves all the information contained in the data. The process itself, and the result it delivers, is ideally guided by experts outside the enterprise, to ensure inter-organisational comparability. The process reveals threats and opportunities through iteration, and establishes a framework for understanding risks to reputation. Any Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) project that does not include risks to reputation ignores a meta-risk and is incomplete and invalid. KEY WORDS: Cindynics, Expectations, Opportunity, Perception, Reputation, Risk, Stakeholders, Threat, Trust, MACBETH method, Multicriteria decision aiding, Interacting criteria, Fuzzy logic, Choquet integral.…

    • 14320 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paper summary

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nowadays, the customers want better products available at cheaper prices. The authors believe that for a production system to sustain in such a market, the key is to be “agile”. That is, to be able to deal with demand uncertainties and other variations inside the supply chain without sacrificing their goals and/or objectives. In order to achieve this, the system has to incorporate flexible production methods, flexible resources and manpower. The authors feel that in order to deal with the variations in demand and other factors in the production system, the decision-making power needs to be distributed into the various echelons of the system. In order for this to happen, the information available to these echelons should support the decentralized decision-making. The authors strive to explain how DES can be used to generate the necessary information which would assist the decision-making process and gives proper feedback thus providing the system with the necessary agility.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays