Preview

Intel Pentium Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
952 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intel Pentium Case Study
Memorandum
To: Andrew Grove, President & CEO, Intel Inc.
From: FT56212/0
Subject: The Intel Pentium Chip Controversy

Intel, the most popular micro-processing chip manufacturer in the early nineties had introduced the Pentium processor to improve speed of computer operations. The Pentium was the result of constant innovation and expensive research and development and yet was accused as being defective in solving particular mathematical calculations.
The primary question facing Intel was whether or not to recall the defective Pentium chip processors. I would recommend that Intel recall the chips from customers, both from an ethical and a strategic perspective (XYZ Goup Work, 2012).

Issues
Ethics: Intel’s engineers were aware that there was a defect in the product in the 2nd quarter of 1993, before the product was launched. The company brushed it off as insignificant, and claimed this would only affect users involved in continuous mathematical computations, and not the average user of the PC. (Narayanan, 2002)
Strategy & Marketing: Intel failed to address the situation as soon as reports about the defective started to become public, gradually leading to clients like IBM & Sequent stopping their shipping of Pentium installed PC’s. (Narayanan, 2002)
The company only offered to replace chips for those customers who were deemed to be directly affected by the defect as decided by Intel Engineers, despite getting calls from thousands of Pentium PC users. (Narayanan, 2002)
Stock value: Intel’s stock fluctuated significantly after the news of the defective chip became public and its market capital dropped by $1.34 billion [(http://finance.yahoo.com) (Exhibit A)]
Operations: Production of defective chips would have to continue for another quarter in some of Intel’s factories, despite public knowledge of defectiveness. (Narayanan, 2002)
Finance & Accounting: The Company would have to decide whether to recognize or defer recognition revenue

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    NoBugs

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Overall business of both the companies were running smoothly from past ten years, but Sterling’s business started facing trouble because of the growing cases of explosion in the computers manufactured by Sterling Inc. A thorough investigation of the cases has revealed that defect was not in computer manufacturing process of the Sterling, but were from the microchips manufactured by the NoBugs Corporation, which were supplied to Sterling Inc. It has been found in investigations that due to an inappropriate production condition, such as the miscalibration of NoBugs’s encoding equipment, the microchips produced by NoBugs remained below standard speculations. Due to the inefficiency or defectiveness of the microchips, computers manufactured by Sterling started exploding after little use.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The flaw was first discovered in June 1994, when Intel engineers first noticed that the floating-point unit (FPU) on the chip gave the wrong answer. However future tests done by Intel showed that the error appeared only in the ninth significant digit of the answer and affected a very, very small percentage of possible division combinations. The results of this flaw…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Pentium flaw” or the Pentium FDIV bug was when Intel released defective Pentium processors. The defect was malfunctioning P5 Pentium floating point unit causing the computer to calculate division incorrectly. The “bug” was discovered by Professor Thomas Nicely when working on mathematical equations and noticed many inconsistencies in his calculations when he added a Pentium based computer on June, 13, 1994. Intel tried to keep the bug out of the lime light while they worked on updates to try and fix the problem but, persistent consumers kept pushing the issue on the internet and in magazines.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another concern dealt with customers who purchased fewer processors than were eventually thought to be needed. In these cases KSR would send additional processors for installation and use by the customer. Although the company would only book revenue and accounts receivable for the processors actually requested, they would keep the additional processor sent on their books as inventory until the customer decided to buy them.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    admitted to Intel being aware of the flaw since May 1994. The flaw was discovered by…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sterling computer has entered into a partnership with NoBugs a microchip processing computer. The collaboration was developing into a something successful until an incident put a strain in the business relationship. Some month ago Sterling computer has had several of their computers explode shortly after customers install them. Upon an investigation which was conducted by Sterling researchers have discovered evidence of NoBugs’s microchips aggravating a dormant defect in their computers, causing them to explode. The analysis on NoBugs microchips revealed that they were indeed below design specification and that the imperfections were caused by a slight miscalibration of NoBugs’s encoding equipment. Once, the information was presented to NoBugs they course of action correcting the problem by recalibrating the equipment and promptly resumed production of making perfect chips. However, this incident has caused Sterling business to bare the gaunt of the financial burden which is a loss of profits, out-of-pocket associated with compensating customers for the explosions, and injury to its business reputation by total accumulation will exceed somewhere north of $20 million dollars.…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pentium Flaw

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In June 1994, Intel discovered the floating-point unit flaw in the Pentium microprocessor. Professor Thomas Nicely, a professor of mathematics at the Lynchburg College, had written code to enumerate primes, twin primes, prime triplets, and prime quadruplets. Professor Thomas Nicely noticed some inconsistencies in the calculations on June 13th , 1994 shortly after adding a Pentium system to his group of computers, but was unable to eliminate other possible factors (such as programming errors, motherboard chipsets, etc.) until October 19, 1994. On October 24th, 1994 he reported the flaw he encountered to Intel. According to Professor Thomas Nicely, the person that he contacted at Intel later admitted to Intel being aware of the flaw since May 1994. The flaw was discovered by Intel during testing of the FPU for its new P6 core, which was first used in the Pentium Pro.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Go to ‘Library and Learning Services’ along the left side of the MMCC home page. Follow the previous instructions to locate academic articles in the indicated databases for Intel then Intel and Chip and finally Intel and Chip and Pentium.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 5 research paper

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Worst of all is that Intel knew all about this flaw but told no one. They kept it a secret…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a result, Computers R Us has received multiple complaints about CompleteCare at the Computers…

    • 1348 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intel case

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Intel Corporation is known for it’s innovative successes and the ability to think outside the box. Some of Intel’s sources of competitive advantages in DRAM were that they were able to make a smaller product, they were able to create a complex product that helped deal with the imitation issue and they were able to a more cost effective product. Intel’s sources of competitive advantages for microprocessors on the other hand were different and more effective. They were able to control most of the microprocessor market which eliminated the threat of a hold-up, they were able to eliminate the risk of imitation by copyrights for microprocessor code, and…. What about substitution???…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in spite of all the sunshine, Dell was facing the following problems 1) Manufacturing costs in the desktop PC division continued to surge with Level 5 being critical. This was leading to an overall increase in the manufacturing costs & thus negating the benefits of the contract manufacturing arrangement 2) Dell had to increase reliance on 3rd Party integrators (3PIs) resulting in lower quality products in addition to forecasting errors in capacity planning at…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intel Case

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between 1974-1984, Intel started losing market share to Japanese competition. This lost in market share can be attributed to several reasons. The first would be the fact that patents were not easily enforceable for DRAMS. Additionally the Japanese competitors have invested heavily in manufacturing and process technologies, leading to faster development cycles, higher yields, and a technological advantage.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pentium Micro Flaw

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pentium microprocessor flaw was discovered in June, 1994. The Pentium microprocessor is the CPU for what was once possibly the widest-selling personal computer. Unlike previous CPUs that Intel put on the market, the 486DX and Pentium chips included a floating-point unit (FPU), which is also known as a math coprocessor. Previous Intel CPUs performed arithmetic using integers; programs that used floating-point numbers (non-integers like 2.5 or 3.14) needed to tell the chip how to divide them using integer arithmetic. The 486DX and Pentium chips have these instructions built into the chip, in their FPUs, which allowed them to be much faster for intense numerical calculations, more complex, and more expensive. All Pentiums manufactured that fall had errors in the on-chip FPU instructions for division. This caused the Pentium’s FPU to incorrectly divide certain floating-point numbers.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    June 1994: Intel testers discover a division error in the Pentium chip. Intel managers decide that the error will not affect many people and do not inform anyone outside the company. This was Intel's first mistake. The company was right in that the division error could affect only a few customers, but not disclosing the information made Intel appear to hide a sinister secret. It sent the message to customers that Intel was not trustworthy. Disclosing the flaw upon discovery would have created only minor news, on the same low level as an automaker announcing a minor defect. The same month, Dr. Thomas R. Nicely, a professor…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays