Preview

Intermediate Sanctions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intermediate Sanctions
Intermediate Sanctions
Intermediate sanctions are the sanctions that are more restrictive than the probation and less restrictive than imprisonment. It is also intended to relieve the pressure on the over crowed facilities that deal with the corrections and the probation departments that are understaffed.
The purpose for the intermediate sanction in the criminal justice process is that it helps with any of the concerns from the facilities being packed and over crowed. Jails and the prisons are packed more this century then the last century. It also helps with the short staff that is in the offices and the probation officers short staffed. The government should take it under consideration that the criminal justice system needs the staff and the money to make the criminal justice organization work together.
There are two functions as a sentencing alternative in the intermediate sanction. They are to divert the offenders from the overcrowded jails or prisons. The second one is to place the different offenders under the higher levels of the control. It is the risk that the community poses to. * I believe that the intermediate sanctions are not an appropriate punishment. People should not have to serve their time behind bars because they prisons and jail cells are over packed and crowded. The government should put in more funds so that if people do the crime, then they should do the time. Also, probation is an advantage and that people should not be misused. * In conclusion, I believe that the intermediate sanction can work out if people do not take advantage of the probation punishment. This punishment should only be used if there is no room in the jail cell or the prisons. I believe that once someone does a crime, that that person may do it again. * * * *

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Intermediate sanctions can offer increased surveillance, tighter controls on movement, and a more intense treatment for an assortment of maladies and deficiencies, and can provide an increase of offender accountability. For example, the goal of incapacitation may be implemented with surveillance and control of movement.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intermediate sanctions are designed to give judges other sentencing options beside imprisonment or probation. These types of sanctions are less restrictive than imprisonment but more restrictive than probation. Intermediate sanctions are usually combined with imprisonment, probation, and each other.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intermediate sanctions are sanctions that are more restrictive than probation and less restrictive than imprisonment. The main purposes of intermediate sanctions are to reduce the pressures of overcrowded jails and prisons, and understaffed probation officers, and offices. There are two primary types of sentences for committing a crime, which are to be imprisoned, and probation but the judge also has other sentencing options that he/she can oppose,…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intermediate sanctions tend to overlap the issues that arise when a criminal is released back into society from incarceration. Most often, the offenders, once released, return back to prison within 1-5 years (Fagin, 265). The reasons vary, but most likely it’s because the offender has not had proper preparation on how to ease back into society after being locked up for so much time. Intermediate sanctions are criminal penalties that do not include jail time or probation. Rather, intermediate sanctions fall in the middle of these types of punishments and offer an alternative to them.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M1 Custodial Care

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    These two types of schemes work extremely well in prisons. The Adjudications work well because some prisoners think that they are in prison they cannot be punished further, however these adjudications could make them realise they are not above anything and can still be punished for their actions. Whereas for the prisoners who behave well and do not try anything against the rules, the rewards are given. This could make them realise that they do not need to…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    that a person can gain a whole new understanding of their problems and troubles when they are…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Instead of sentencing these individuals to jail alternative sentencing options are suggested. This includes probation, community service, residential treatment, as well as other options that don’t include jail time for lesser offenses.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to intermediate sanctions there are positive to it and there are negatives. One positive thing that comes from intermediate sanctions is that it lowers the costs that we have to pay for people in prison. If these people are not going to prison and are going under house arrest they are having to pay for their food and most other things themselves instead of having it provided for them. Another positive is that being on these types of programs these people will learn that if they want something that they need to get out there and work for it instead of having it handed to them. The negatives of these intermediate sanctions is that some criminals that are put on house arrest could still commit their crimes, for example a drug dealer…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in our country our justice system runs by two models in order to keep peace and order to the public the first model is the determinate sentencing model what the Determinate model is when the judge is about to pass a sentence on to defendant and to address the problem with crimes that has been going around since the 1980s for example the government of some states in our country passed the three strike laws where when someone commits a crime that is considered serious then they get harsher sentences and to tell people who are more likely to commit the crime to don’t do it and it is not worth it . One of the pros for the determinate sentencing model is that the defendant could be eligible for probation, parole and alternative programs…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ultimately, I would advocate indeterminate sentencing for suspects that caused part 1 offenses while I would advocate determinate sentencing for suspects that only caused part two offenses. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion but one thing is for sure, without the proper use of sentencing, our community would be far more dangerous than before.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of sentencing: the “deserved infliction of suffering on evildoers and “the prevention of crime.” There four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing. First, the oldest and most common is retribution. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. The second philosophy is deterrence. In deterrence, the goal of sentencing is to prevent future crimes. Deterrence takes a general and specific form. General deterrence is that by punishing one person, others will be dissuaded from committing a similar crime. Specific deterrence assumes thart an individual, after being punished once for a certain act,…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Sentencing Procedure

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of punishment is paramount for the protection of society. Sentencing is traditionally the means in which the state and the community punish the offender for the crime they have committed. For a sentencing to occur the judge or magistrate may try to fulfil punishment objectives such as: incapacitation which is needed to protect society by removing the offender from society. Deterrence which tries to inhibit an individual offender as well as sending a message to the community that criminal behaviour is unacceptable and will be punished. Rehabilitation which tries to change the behaviour of the offender so that they will not re-offend. Retribution can be seen as the most important factor in sentencing. The impact of the crime will reflect on society, thus retribution encompasses the notion that the punishment should fit the crime. This is the most important factor of sentencing. The judge or magistrate has to consider the particular sentence to provide for the accused. THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURES) ACT 1999 (NSW) lays down the allowable purpose of sentencing in s 3A of the act, this act is cost efficient to society and requires no additional resources to enforce its guidelines. An example of the purpose of punishment incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation and retribution is evident in the case Regina v Milat February 1998 where Ivan Milat was sentenced seven consecutive life sentences plus eighteen years. The punishment was given primarily on…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe mandatory sentences could be effective if the correctional system was expanded to accommodate the increase of prisoners. From what I have learned so far, the political climate of the country has a lot to do with sentencing laws. It can be a rollercoaster of tough on crime methods to programs designed to lessen punishment. Mandatory…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics