Preview

Internal Conflict In The Crucible

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internal Conflict In The Crucible
Karol Dabrowski December 1, 2012
English III Period 2: Roll 12 Indicating Theme through Internal Conflict: An Examination of Miller’s Intent in The Crucible Theocracy is a method of government in which a divine being is formally recognized as the public Head of state and community officials are viewed as divinely guided. In a theocratic civilization, God himself is thought of as the head of state. Conscious of how a theocracy can destroy a society, Miller intends to imply – through his portrayal of John Proctor and Reverend Hale – the thematic idea that theocracy is essentially blind and corrupt. One indication of Miller’s intent, in this respect, is his formation of John
…show more content…
This is shown through Reverend John Hale. In the play, after Proctor is arrested, Hale denies the accounts and resigns from the courtroom. Hale informs the courtroom, “I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court” (3.120) Miller chose these words to show how Hale, once a supporter of the trials, now criticizes them and is against the courtroom. These words are an occasion of internal conflict because on one hand he wants to believe what he’s known all of his life but, on the other he believes the trials are corrupt and unfair. From a thematic outlook, Miller aims to imply that when a society is subject to a blind and corrupt government, such as a theocracy, nothing good can come of it much like in the words quoted when the society crumbled and even a once supporter of theocracy criticized it. In another segment of the play, Hale is attempting to get the prisoners to confess their crimes in a useless effort of thwarting their punishments. In the play Herrick says, “He goes among them that will hang, sir. And he prays with them” (4.123). Miller chose these words in order to show how Reverend Hale, a once supporter of the court, now denounces it and attempts to save the lives of the people he assisted in accusing. These words are an instance of internal conflict because Reverend Hale is going against what he believed in …show more content…
In truth, however, such an examination is most likely wrong because Miller obviously suggests his belief that, in truth, a theocratic government is nothing but blind and corrupt. In the drama, Reverend Hale tells Danforth that none of the captives will plead guilty and informs him of what’s going on in the town. Reverend Hale states, “Excellency, there are orphans wandering from house to house; abandoned cattle bellow on the highroads, the stink of rotting crops hangs everywhere. . .” (4.130) As of a thematic standpoint, Miller infers that when people are being ruled by a theocracy pain and disorder are all it can convey because in the play, the town is left in wrecks because of the trials. In another scene of the story, John Proctor admits to witchcraft and Danforth tries to get him to accuse someone else. Judge Danforth states to Proctor, “You have most certainly seen some person with the Devil. Mr. Proctor, a score of people have already testified they saw this woman with the Devil” (4.140). From a thematic opinion, Miller seems to be inferring that a theocratic government is crooked because even after Proctor has confessed to witchcraft they try to get him to convict someone else. According to literary criticizer Muhammad Awan, the charges of the court were unfair and illegitimate. Muhammad Awan claims that, “The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crucible Summary

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this film a group of girls go dancing in the woods with a black slave named Tituba. They see that they have been caught by the local minister and one of the girls falls into a coma. The girl is rushed to the village and puts everyone at worry. Parris tries to calm everyone down they gathered were the girl was kept. Abigail the main girl from the clique talks the girls into admitting they were just dancing in the forest nothing else. John Proctor, a local farmer, hears about what went on in the forest. He also was working for John and his wife Elizabeth, but after she found out Abigail and her own husband were having an affair she quickly fired her from that job. In the movie you can tell that Abigail still wants to be with John but john refuses to commit another foolish act. One day Betty wakes up from her coma and begins screaming. Everyone rushes in and wonders if she was bewitched. Since her parents died and left her, they left her money and land deeds obviously they were going to say that she had been bewitched to get rid of her so that they can take her property. Reverend hale begins growing suspicious of the whole situation and speaks to tituba. Tituba then confesses to communing with the devil, and say that she has seen the devil conspiring with other townspeople. Betty joins them and starts naming witches. Elizabeth knowing all of the killings were not true, she tells her husband to denounce Abigail as a fraud. When her husband refuses to do so Elizabeth becomes very angry and jealous and accuses his of still having feelings for her. Soon Elizabeth is accused of witchcraft and is arrested and taking to court. Elizabeth encourages John to take matters to justice and accuse Abigail and the girls of fraud. Elizabeth is pregnant and is insisted to the court system to…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people in Salem had no manners or respect for others. The impact of poor behavior is exhibited throughout “The Crucible”.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What profit him to bleed? Shall the dust praise him? Shall the worms declare his truth? (145)” Reverend Hale begs Elizabeth to convince John Proctor to convince in order for him not to be hanged. Hale does this because he sees the errors in his ways and knows that Proctor is innocent. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Reverend Hale’s despair, Judge Danforth’s integrity, Reverend Parris’ greed exhibit their use of authority.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several leading characters in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible exhibit qualities of pride and arrogance. Hale and Danforth, two men of considerable authority, convey Miller’s message, and criticism of pride. These two characters show that pride does not shine light on the truth, but rather turns just judgment away from it. Their pride ultimately dictates the decisions of the Salem witch trials, which leads to the deaths of hundreds of innocents.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller reinforces this idea when Judge Danforth's declares, "A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road in between." During Salem's witch trials, the general public felt they were powerless and kept to themselves. One could argue theocracy actually encourages wrongdoing. In a society with outrageous consequences, bad behavior is regularly kept secret. Miller exemplifies this theory by creating a veiled affair between Abigail and John Proctor. Fear and cowardice are the key fraudulent traits in The…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before the official separation of Church and State, religious leaders in America held most of the power. Therefore, religion-bound ideas bled into the natural flow of human thinking, and the two were intertwined. Exploring classic literature can help illustrate the two-strand rope of human thought, especially by studying and interpreting Puritan-era works like The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, and “Sinners in the Hands of An Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards. Although theological ethics are significant motivators towards personal choice in these three works, so are humanistic ethics, leading to conflict between the two ideas.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Men of high stature and prestige with intimidating power have always been in control of many aspects in a society. Deputy Danforth and Reverend Hale were considered to be “godly” men with power and control who followed the scriptures of their God. While attempting to be an example of a holy Christian, they became corrupt in their actions and went against biblical law to enhance their own lives. Deputy Danforth and Reverend Hale begin their oppositions towards one another when Reverend Hale experiences an epiphany of his actions, and Danforth remains condemning innocent people. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller uses rhetoric strategies…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    T: Reverend John Hale changed from the beginning to the end of the play the Crucible.…

    • 879 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reverend Hale Analysis

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court allegations reach an unlawful point when reputable villagers like John Proctor are being sentenced to death. This action causes Hale to proclaim, “I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court!” (1213). He now understands that evil is not in the accused suspects of witchcraft, but in the accusers themselves. Hale’s viewpoints change when Judge Danforth will not let him explain why the suspects are innocent. Once Hale is silenced, he bursts out, “Let you not mistake your duty as I mistook my own. I came into this village like a bridegroom to his beloved, bearing gift of high religion...and what I touched with my bright confidence, it died...Beware Goody Proctor...It is mistaken law that leads you to sacrifice. Life...is God’s most precious gift; no principle...may justify the taking of it...prevail upon your husband to confess.” (1224-1225) John Hale is trying to persuade the guilty to confess. He wants them to understand that by confessing, it spares them their life. He wants them to fathom that life is the most important gift and to cherish it. Hale is in opposition of the court when he realizes his actions accidentally led to the death’s of many accused, including John Proctor. By withdrawing his favor towards the court, he put his own reputation aside to help the guilty to try and save…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women In The Crucible

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All of the men in the court want to be in power. Reverend John Hale tries to help John Proctor in certain situations and Hale is suddenly turned down, everything he would say. Hale had tried multiple times with putting in a good word for Proctor to the other courtmen, and they would not care, they were just worried about him having the affair and of being accused for witchcraft. The court had no real proof that Proctor was guilty, and when hale would try to save him the court would announce that Hale had no proof he was innocent, but they never noticed they didn’t…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Truth In The Crucible

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Learning and speaking the truth are not always the easiest things to accept. In The Crucible accepting the truth is one of the main issues that occur throughout the play. Though everybody now knows that most or all depending on what the reader wants to believe were not witches, and consequently died for something they never did. Many characters lie throughout the play for their own reasons some to due with land while the others for more personal reasons. The death of many were caused by the others failing to accept the truth.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller is a great author that uses many forms of syntax, figurative language, and diction to enhance his writing throughout The Crucible. Miller uses figurative language throughout The Crucible, to put emphasis on certain ideas and things. Miller also uses diction in The Crucible to show that the story is taking place in the past and to give the story a more biblical feel to it. One other thing that Arthur Miller does really well is his use of syntax. He uses syntax throughout The Crucible to show the intelligence levels of different characters. Miller uses these three different things in combination throughout The Crucible to enhance the story and to tell the story of the witch craft trials in an insightful way.…

    • 846 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through my time being with the church I have never questioned or doubted the sacredness of our work once, but recently I have come to find myself realizing that the duty performed by reverends of this sanction are ill minded in determining the wrongfulness of a fellow towns member’s affairs. I am now considering leaving the church; I must record all of my reasons for doing so in this journal.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hypocrisy

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Arthur Miller 's "The Crucible", the people of Salem are in a crisis and sometimes people who claim to be good aren 't what they seem and may be in fact a hypocrite. Judge Danforth a senior judge during the Salem witch trials exposes his hypocrisy in his conflicts between Giles Corey, Mary Warren and the people of the town for the sake of his own reputation.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Proctor is an honest, plain-speaking local farmer. He is an impressive presence in the room, being described as ‘a man in his prime’ and ‘powerful of body’, illustrating his strength and independence. Although some people criticise his religious commitments, he is generally ‘respected and even feared in Salem’, again suggesting his position in the community. However, we then learn that he is a ‘sinner’. Although it may be easy, at this point, for the reader to judge Proctor, forming a negative opinion of him, we then learn that he sins ‘against his own vision of decent conduct’ and regards himself as a ‘fraud’, implying that he regrets and is ashamed of his sins. Proctor represents common sense and decency. He is not perfect, but is very aware of his own faults, unlike many others in the play. He is his own harshest judge. He believes very strongly in telling the truth but is tortured by the knowledge that he is living a lie. Although he is guilty of hypocrisy, he condemns himself for it. Here, Miller presents proctor in a more positive light and intends for the reader to empathise with Proctor, given that he regrets his mistakes and is burdened constantly by guilt.…

    • 1884 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays