Preview

International Relation Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1107 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
International Relation Theory
Compare and Contrast Classical Realism and Classical Liberalism

The International relation has many issues to debate. The most keenly debate issues in International relation is pessimistic view of The Classical Realism against the optimistic view of The Classical Liberalism. The theory of The Realism came from ancient times. This theory was first time established in Greece in 431 BC by Thucydides. The Theory of The Realism is defined as in favour of using of power to bring to realization the interest of nation. They have a pessimistic view of human nature and high regard for the values of national security .The realist are more sceptics about progress in international politics. They think that international relation is always conflictual. Another theory which is completely the opposite is Liberalism. The Classical Liberalism theory is a political ideology which was founded on ideas of freedom and equality. That ideology was introduced to the world by John Locke in the Seventeenth Century (Jackson,2010). The Classical Liberalism belief in progress and has a conviction that international relation can be cooperative. In that essay will be compared and contrast main arguments of two theory’s which is Classical Realism and Classical Liberalism. Firstly, will be compared and contrasted a human nature of Classical Realism and Classical Liberalism. The Classical Realism has pessimistic view of human nature. The Classic Realist Thucydides’ says that international politics is driven to have a fight for a power, which has its roots in human nature (Baylis,2011) .In realist theory thought that human are highly competitive. They consequently trying always being first. They do not wish to be taken advantages of. They try very hard do not have good international relations with other countries also trying to stop domination by others .Thucydides think that state just think about itself benefits rather than people which live in that state.



Bibliography: : Baylis J. , Smith S. , Owens P. (January 29, 2011). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations . 5th ed. USA: Oxford University Press. p102-113. Jackson R. ,Sorensen G. (April 19, 2010). Introduction to International Relations: Theories Machiavelli N. (February 11, 2006). The Prince. Available: www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=2533203. Last accessed 01.06.2011.and Approaches . 4th ed. USA: Oxford University Press. p59-69,p96-126. Hobbes T.. (February 11, 2006). THE LEVIATHAN. Available: http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html. Last accessed 01.06.2011. By Thucydides. (January 29, 1994). The History of the Peloponnesian War. Available: http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.html. Last accessed 02.06.2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens P. (eds) (2008), Shapcott, R.in 'The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3976 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Thucydides, and Rex Warner. History of the Peloponnesian War. London, England:Penguin Group, 1972. Print.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realism is conservative and negative. Realists plan for durability of the current international state of affairs. Liberalism is progressive and hopeful. Liberals believe change is necessary and inevitable. Both realism and liberalism contain truths. Liberal’s hopeful view of international politics is based on these beliefs: liberals consider states to be the main actors in international politics, they emphasize that the internal characteristics of states vary, and that these differences have extreme effects on state behavior. Liberals also believe that calculations about power matter little for explaining the behavior of good states.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Study on Asos

    • 3973 Words
    • 16 Pages

    10. Baylis, J., Smith, S., Owens, P. (Eds.), 2010. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, 5th ed. OUP Oxford.…

    • 3973 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mingst, A. K. & Arrenguin, M. I. 2011. Contending Perspectives: How to think about International Relations Coherently, Essentials of International Relations. 5th ed. New York: WW Norton & Company.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roskin, M., Berry, N. (2010). IR: The New World of International Relations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Roskin, M.G. & Berry, N.O. (2010). IR: The new world of international relations: Eighth ed.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morgenthau, Hans J. 1953: Political limitations of the United Nations. In: Lipsky, Georg A. (ed): Law and Politics in the World Community. Essays on Hans Kelsen 's Pure Theory and Related Problems in International Law, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 143-152. Ness, Gayl D./Brechin, Steven R. 1988: Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations. In: International Organization 42 (2), 245-273. North, Douglass C. 1990: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge UP. Olson, Mancur 1968: Die Logik des kollektiven Handelns. Kollektivgüter und die Theorie der Gruppen. Tübingen, Mohr. Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood 1989: World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press. Peters, Anne 2006: Völkerrecht: Allgemeiner Teil. Zürich et al., Schulthess. Powell, Robert 1994: Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. In: International Organization 48 (2), 313-44. Putnam, Robert D. 1988: Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. In: International Organization 42 (3), 427-460. Risse, Thomas 2007: Social Constructivism Meets Globalization. In: Held, David/McGrew, Anthony (eds): Globalization Theory. Approaches and Controversies. Polity Press. Cambridge and Malden, 126-147. Selten, Reinhard 1978: The Chain Store Paradox. In: Theory and Decision 9 (2), 127-159. Selten, Reinhard/Stoecker, Rolf 1986: End Behavior in Finite Prisoner’s Dilemma Supergames. A Learning Theory Approach. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 7 (1), 4770. Shanks, Cheryl/Jacobson, Harold K./Kaplan, Jeffrey H. 1996: Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981-1992. In: International Organization 50 (4), 593-627. Simmons, Beth A./Martin, Lisa L. 2002: International Organizations and Institutions. In: Carlsnaes, Walter/Risse, Thomas/Simmons, Beth A. (eds.) Handbook of International Relations. Sage: London et al., 192-211. Stein, Arthur A. 1995: Coordination and collaboration: regimes in an anarchic world. In: Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.): International Regimes. Cornell UP: Ithaca and London, 115-140. Strange, Susan 1997: The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge UP. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne. Ulbert, Cornelia 2005: Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik. Theoretische Ansätze und methodische Herangehensweisen. In: Ulbert, Cornelia/Weller, Christoph (eds.): Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 934. Vaubel, Roland 2006: Principal-agent problems in international organizations. In: Review of International Organizations 1 (2), 125-138.…

    • 17660 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical realism has mainly come to be associated with Hans Morgenthau who is said to have had the largest impact on the field. This theory is mainly state level based and highlights that all people are greedy, aggressive, insecure and thus the same states that govern these people must have the same characteristics as the people make the state and the state is defined by the people present. Realists believe that power politics is a law of human behavior. Thus meaning it is in bred within all humans to thirst for power and it is that same drive for power and the motivation to dominate and have authority over others evolve into the fundamental aspects of human nature. Seeing as classical realists believe this, they tend to see international politics and power politics are all equivalent. Hans J. Morgenthau explained in many of his works that to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ancient Greece

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: From: Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, Benjamin Jowett, trans., (New York: Duttons, 1884), pp. 11-23, Sections 1.2-17.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Goldstein & Pevehouse (2007). International Relations (Brief 2008-2008 edition). New York, NY: Pearson Longman…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Lancov, S. (2006) 'World politics and International Relations '. Studybook. Retrieved on 18, April, 2013.…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    China Rise

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Realism and liberalism are the two important theoretical frameworks explain and predict the patterns of international relations in general and security in particular. While realism considers the states always are adversaries of each others so world peace is very difficult to realize without a global central authority(Betts), conversely, liberalism treat states are rational entities with benign-oriented commitments so that international peace could be achieved and facilitated under the supports of international institutions such as United Nations. As a new power and a large economy of the world, the ‘peaceful rise’ policy of People Republic of China (PRC) , could be explorered by both paradigms. Based on that comparative study, this essay will find out the contrast and convergence of the two paradigms in the case of the most powerful communist country, but set aside from the viewpoint of Marxism. Additionally, this essay suggests that there is a convergence in explaining for the PRC’s peaceful rise policy from the viewpoints of both paradigms. As a result, a new framework to assess similar international security policies will be proposed. This is an initial effort to invent a new paradigm which is totally different with communism to be best applied in formulating and implementing international security policy which could be applied in a similar country like China to achieve a more peaceful world. As a result, this finding will reject the assumption that communism is the theoretical framework used to achieve this policy and incline with the finding from Fukuyama (p.7) that…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Originating from the German word 'Realpolitik ' , realism is often used as a term which fits a more realistic and unpretentious political theory, as opposed to an unrealistic ideological theory. It is this theory which has been one of the leading and most prominent ways of thinking in terms of international relations in modern times, with its stark view of nation states and people appealing greatly to the Western leading political institutions, as recently it has become another phrase for 'power politics '. Instead of referring to itself as an ideology, realists see it as more of a straight forward rational theory, a way of thinking reasonably in the situation, rather than seeing the world as a far fetched and ideological utopia. Political realism is seen as a way of explaining political philosophy models, and to prescribe political relations. It makes many assumptions, the key one being that power is indeed (or ought to be) the first point in political action, be it in an international or domestic sphere. Domestically, this theory declares that the politicians must look to take full advantage of their power. However when in the international arena the nation states should be the primary agents that advance and seek to make the most of the power available to them. It can be seen therefore that nations and politicians ought to pursue power or their own interests in theory, but in reality the ruling nation state of affairs-that nations and politicians only selfishly pursue power.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Different theories explain why international organizations are created; which are basically a response to problems of incomplete information, transaction costs, and other barriers to efficiency and welfare improvement for their members. But different questions like; do international organizations really do what their creators intend them to do? Do they really support member states in achieving their basic interests mutually? These critical questions and others of their likes can be analyzed to some extent by several theories proposed by different scholars in the field of international relations. Such theories are liberal, realism and constructivism but the concern of this work is on realism and liberal theory.…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays