Preview

International Trade

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
35536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
International Trade
Content I. Vertical Integration II. Horizontal integration III. Economies of scale IV. Economies of scope V. Economic efficiency VI. Proprietary(property or ownership) Know-how VII. Monopoly VIII. Oligopoly IX. perfect competition (pure competition) business definition X. workable competition business definition XI. Cost leadership XII. Differentiation (economics) XIII. Barriers to exit XIV. Inventory flow XV. Incoterms XVI. Multinational Corporation XVII. Parent company XVIII. Decentralization XIX. Centralisation XX. License XXI. Intellectual property XXII. Copyright XXIII. Patent XXIV. Legal monopoly XXV. Trademark I. Vertical integration
In microeconomics and management, the term vertical integration describes a style of management control. Vertically integrated companies in a supply chain are united through a common owner. Usually each member of the supply chain produces a different product or (market-specific) service, and the products combine to satisfy a common need. It is contrasted with horizontal integration. Vertical integration has also described management styles that bring large portions of the supply chain not only under a common ownership, but also into one corporation (as in the 1920s when the Ford River Rouge Complex began making much of its own steel rather than buy it from suppliers).
Vertical integration is one method of avoiding the hold-up problem. A monopoly produced through vertical integration is called a vertical monopoly.
Nineteenth-century steel tycoon Andrew Carnegie's example in the use of vertical integration[1] led others to use the system to promote financial growth and efficiency in their businesses.
Three types
Vertical integration is the degree to which a firm owns its upstream suppliers and its downstream buyers. Contrary to horizontal integration, which is a consolidation of many firms that handle the same part of the production process, vertical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. A company buys another company in the same supply chain, but either in front of it or behind it in the supply chain. This is called…

    • 250 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. By the pool method the company would consume all competition to control supply interlocking directorate was when a company or group with control the board members of other companies to facilitate deals to benefit the baeking party horizontal integration is where a corporation controls all of one area of production to hold a monopoly on that stage of production vertical integration is when a company controls all stages of production of a product controlling every part and monopolizing prices…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Horizontal merger refers to two companies that were once competitors but came together to merge into one large organization. As one large operation, they are serving the same clientele under one entity.…

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A horizontal merger is a merger occurring between companies in the same industry. They are a business consolidation that occurs between firms who operate in the same space, often as competitors offering the same good or service. They are common in industries with fewer firms, as competition tends to be higher and the synergies and potential gains in market share are much greater for merging firms in such an industry.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APush

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. Vertical Integration- which a company would control every stageof the industrial process, from mining the raw materials to transporting the finished product…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The owner of Carnegie Steel Company, Andrew Carnegie, pioneered the use of vertical integration. Vertical integration is a system of related businesses in which a parent company owns its suppliers. Back then the railroads needed steel for their rails and cars, the navy needed steel for their new naval fleet, and the cities needed steel to build their skyscrapers. When Andrew Carnegie saw this demand he took advantage of it. When Carnegie started his steel company he started with a very little amount of money so in order to pay less to manufacture the steel and increase his profits, Carnegie bought out companies that provided raw materials like iron, which is one of the main components of steel. He bought out coal companies as well because it was needed to heat the furnaces that were used in the Bessemer process. Not only did he buy products to produce his steel, he also bought railroads so he could ship his steel at a much lower cost. He was able to beat out competitors by producing his steel cheap and efficient that everyone chose to buy form him and not anyone else.…

    • 567 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 4 Knowledge Check

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5.A company buys another company in the same supply chain, but either in front of it or behind it in the supply chain. This is called…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When one company controls an entire area of goods or services, so that customers don't have other choices.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MKT 411 Final Exam Review

    • 5846 Words
    • 24 Pages

    SC Integration – the idea of working together with the other firms in the supply chain to achieve total lower costs and better customer service (concept of seamless integration)…

    • 5846 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a) Andrew Carnegie & Steel: He founded his own company in the steel business and used vertical integration (acquiring companies that supplied his business). He sold the company to J.P. Morgan for $480 million. He believed in the “Gospel of Wealth”- Wealthy people had a duty toward the rest of society. (pg. 469)…

    • 5327 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 14 Section 3

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Vertical Integration-a company’s taking over its suppliers and distributors and transportation systems to gain total control over the quality and cost of its product.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vertical integration is defined in our Marketing Essentials textbook as the acquisition or merger with an intermediary in the channel that is either a supplier or a buyer (Page 270). SUPERVALU has grown to have networked with retail chains. This includes CUB FOODS, FARM FRESH, HORNBACHERS, SHOP 'N SAVE, and SHOPPERS (Page 297). SUPERVALU has also bought Rainbow Foods stores. They have also had to sell five of its grocery store chains. SUPERVALU has a broad and growing network of grocery stores to do…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economics study guide

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the difference between a horizontal merger and a vertical merger? Horizontal merger combines companies that produce the same product under one large company. Vertical merger—the company owns all of the factors that go into producing the product.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Esquel

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The degree to which a firm owns its upstream suppliers and its downstream buyers is referred to as vertical integration. In the case of Esquel I believe it to be a right strategy of vertical integration. This is advantageous in some regards since this would allow the company to control many of the variables that may affect the efficiency and the consistency of your products and service. And better control of the supply chain. The cons would be it would take a lot of time and strategy to do vertical integration. The integration would make the firm dealing with a numerous aspects irrelevant to the product such as proper usage of raw materials. In case of delay of any process it would disrupt the sales. Esquel uniqueness is their control over the quality of the product and service which made vertical integration a remarkable strategy.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays