Preview

Internet Censorship

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
481 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internet Censorship
S. Walls
Dr. Patterson
EN 111 07
13 November 2012
Internet Censorship Internet is one of the biggest and most used sources for, entertainment, information, and social interactions. Many Americans rely on the Internet for their personal, and work lives. If the government is allowed to restrict what we as a free people can and can not see, they cross a line that shouldn’t be crossed. The major problems with censoring the Internet are, the violation of the First Amendment, passing the bill could lead to other government controls, and the possibility of fanning the flames of civil unrest.
Censorship is the control of information and ideas circulated within a society. It has been a hallmark of dictatorships throughout history. In the 20th Century, censorship was achieved through the examination of books, plays, films, television and radio programs, news reports, and other forms of communication for the purpose of altering or suppressing ideas found to be objectionable or offensive. The rationales for censorship have varied, with some censors targeting material deemed to be indecent or obscene; heretical or blasphemous; or seditious or treasonous. The government censoring internet content is a clear violation of our First Amendment, and as a country founded on the Constitution we cannot allow that. One of the most popular, and cherished rights granted to Americans is freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment. Censoring and regulating what we as American citizens can and can’t see on the Internet is a direct opposition of the Amendment.
With the government having the power to violate the first amendment they can move on to other things, there may never be an end to where enough is enough. Once the government sees the opportunity at hand they will be able to move onto other situations and change them as they see fit. Many people in the tech world agree that piracy is a real problem, but they worry about the significance of this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Blown To Bits Analysis

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The FCC regulates the media sources of the United States of America. The regulate the radios and television of america. They ensure that there is not any malicious content being broadcasted to the American public. The FCC wished to censor the internet after they successfully censored television and radio. I think this is ridiculous the purpose of the internet is to be able to communicate and transfer information of any sort or any kind between people. This regulation would destroy the purpose of the internet. It is up to the user to decide whether or not something is malicious content not the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By denying the public the right of access to any form of information the government denies the public their basic rights. The public should be trusted with information, just as the public trusts government officials with the governance of their country. The government is not only defiling the rights of American citizens by censoring what information they have access to, but betraying the trust they bestowed upon them to make decisions in their best interests. Political and social activist said it best: “The right to know is the right to live” (FreedomInfo, 2006). This sums up perfectly what many take for granted, that information is not simply knowing, but something which influences every aspect of an individual’s…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censoring the internet doesn’t allow individuals to know the truth about the world we live in. Also, it contradicts with our law of freedom of speech. Critics argue that if we’re blind to the world, it’s more dangerous than living in a world of truth. “Critics also say that by implementing a law on internet censorship, abusive government officials will get away with their wrong practices such as abuse of power and corruption” (Green Garage). Even though that might be true, the government will always do whatever it takes to hide certain information that could break them. In the end censoring the web will always be a tough topic to debate about. Experts have made very important points on why we shouldn’t censor the web but I still believe censoring it will be a huge advancement to everyone. Censoring the web prevents human trafficking, cyber bullying and stops identity theft. It also ends things like the black market and the other illegal activities. The list of upsides that censoring the web has can go on forever. I think everyone can agree though that saving people lives and stopping criminals in the act is way more important than some “truth” that might be hidden from us. Censoring the internet will either make or break this world and in the end we have to decide whether it’s worth finding…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We all want the Internet to be fun and safe place where everyone can go and enjoy the great benefits it offers. Pro-censorship groups do not want to see someone’s freedom of speech to be taken away from them. Every citizen is guaranteed even if it is on the Internet. Likewise, anti-censorship groups do not want children being exposed to inappropriate…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebuttal Research Paper

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Censorship according to the Encyclopedia Britannica is "The Act of changing or suppressing speech or writing that is considered subversive of the common good." Censorship, therefore, undermines and is contrary to the First Amendment, which is intended to allow freedom of speech.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment protects the privacy of beliefs, the fourth amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure, and the fifth amendment protects the privacy of personal information. All of these protections are made to keep the government from disturbing people's personal lives. However, things posted on the internet are not personal, they are public. The constitution allows for the monitoring of public areas, otherwise, how could laws be enforced? There is a delicate balance between freedom and peace and our government does a pretty good job of keeping that…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Videogame Censorship

    • 3194 Words
    • 13 Pages

    From the blurred images on TV to the beeped out words on the radio, censorship can be seen everywhere. It can be defined as the act or practice of suppressing material deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds. Censorship has been around for decades and has been done by various groups, such as the government, religious groups, corporations, or the mass media. Censorship is also seen in every country and each of them may have its own guidelines in regards to censorship. There are multiple reasons for censoring, such as to prevent state or government secrets from being leaked, to prevent falsification of scientific research, and many others. While many believe that censorship is necessary for the good of the people, other feel that censorship is wrong and that it restricts people’s freedom of speech and expression. Everything that undergoes a form of censorship falls into a certain category of censorship.…

    • 3194 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Censorship is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient as determined by a government, media outlet, or other controlling body. It can be done by governments and private organizations or by individuals who engage in self-censorship.…

    • 3494 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have a right to believe in what we want and say what we want without the government limiting it, but if the government monitors the content we post online, the First Amendment rights we have would be very much at risk of being violated. The first time the Supreme Court heard a case dealing with First Amendment protections and how they apply to the Internet was Elonis v. United States. According to the article The Supreme Court case that could kill online free speech — or curb online harassment, the case revolved around a Pennsylvania man, Anthony Elonis, who posted several violent comments on Facebook in 2010 stating that he wanted to kill his ex-wife for leaving him and taking their children with her. He was convicted and sentenced to 44 months in prison on four counts of “making threats.” Now, Elonis is before the Supreme Court arguing that his threats should not have been taken seriously, as they were just made online, and did not constitute “true threats”. This case really made people start to think whether government should have any power to determine what we can or can't say on the internet, because this can be an overstretch by the government on our First Amendment…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet should be censored in the United States. There are countless websites and search engines that have inappropriate and sometimes false information. Websites such as Wikapedia say that they are accurate but are known for giving false information. Pornographic websites sometimes have harmless URL addresses that can be easily stumbled upon by under age children. In addition, social networking websites do not enforce age restrictions and can be dangerous for young children. These are all examples of the dangers of the lack of censorship on the internet.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is in over their heads. They think they’re the “big dog” and we even call them “Big-Brother”. “Let us never forget that government is ourselves and not an alien power over us. The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a President and senators and congressmen and government officials, but the voters of this country” (Franklin D. Roosevelt). Franklin says the government is not in control, but this country is letting them over power us. Why does the government get to make the laws? Why can’t the American people all get together and discuss what is happening? They won’t be able to stop the American people, because of the first amendment. It gives us the right to speak freely. So why don’t we use it ? The American people might say if we use it to much the government might just take the first amendment away, but if we don’t use it what is the reason for having that amendment. First it is our privacy what’s next? Is the government going to try and take away our freedom of speech…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is suppose to protect our freedom of expression, not censor it. People are putting censorship (officially suppressing ideas or writing) on art, book, and the internet. After Donald Trump became president multiple government websites disappeared from the web. These websites helped to inform US citizens about what is going on in the government. There shouldn’t be censors on the information people need, art people observe, or books people read. These censoring had formed unworldly, immature teenagers. Our young adults are the future, and they’re not ready to go into the adult world still. Censorship has got out of control because it infringes on teenagers rights to learn about the world and to express themselves.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the government should not have control over what is posted on the internet, people should know how to tell whether the information is good information or not. While this does make it hard, trusted sources are easy to come by and the government should not be able to decide what information the citizens get access to and what information they don’t. It makes it harder for them to hide things happening in the world from us like they sometimes do but at the same time, the internet helps them catch a lot of criminals that they wouldn’t have caught in another…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Reagan stated, ‚ÄúGovernment's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.‚Äù When it comes to the role government should play in monitoring the internet, the government has the duty to protect its citizens, but anything overreaching this, is not the duty of the government. The Supreme Court has held there are limitations to the freedom of speech, such as ""advocacy of the use of force"" is unprotected when it is ""directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action"" and is ""likely to incite or produce such action."" These same limitations transfer over when relating to internet content as well. In the name of national security and immediate danger, the government has reason to further investigate, and after thorough examination with the consent of elected officials, has the right to take further action.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Policing the Internet

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Internet was created in the late 1960s so that U.S. Department of Defense researchers could share information with one another and with other researchers. The scientists and academics who created the internet soon saw the power of the new technology: Wires linking computer terminals together in a "web" of networks allow people anywhere in the world to communicate over the computer. Even though it was developed by the government, the Internet is not government run. The Internet Society, a volunteer organization, addresses usage and standards issues. The term NEA was created by Authors Doc Searls and David Weinberger which is an acronym that stands for: No one owns it, Everyone can use it, and Anyone can improve it. Therefor it is not in any government’s power to regulate what can and cannot be viewed on the internet. It cannot be owned by any government or corporation because the internet in itself is classified as an agreement, not a thing. It is a communication source where the whole world can stay connected. Countries such as China and Egypt, as well as many other countries in Asia and Europe, continued to have their rights taken away by their government and are blocked from going on news sites that would keep them up to date on world news. Although there are people who would use the internet as a tool to illegal means, censoring the internet for all citizens is not going to prevent a determined person from saying what needs to be said. It only makes it illegal to do so. Governments that regulate and restrict informational websites end up making themselves look even worse than if they were to just let their citizens have free roam of the world wide web.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays