During the height of the technological revolution of the 21st century, there has been increased controversy on the costs and benefits of a technology-driven society. While it is easy to point out the over-excessive amount of time the public spends online, many fail to see the much more favorable aspects provided through a more interconnected world. Technology is helping amalgamate the world. The use of elements such as the internet and social media grant access to a vast expanse of information, establishing both a local and a global community. The concept of community is being transformed from a physical group of people to a virtual network as people all over the world have increasingly more access to connect with one another.…
One reason why individuals use the internet is because they can gather and share information with other individuals no matter where on the globe they are located. This advancement…
The Internet promotes both convergence and divergence amongst different culutres and nations of the world.…
For the past twenty or so years information has largely been stored in digital form, providing the current generation of digital natives with access to more and more information in recent years. With this new flow of information available to the public has come increased censoring by the government. However, this is not a new issue as some might believe. Since the first primitive government was established information has been shielded and manipulated from the every day citizens of the world by those in power. The cause fought against information censorship enjoys the same past. For as long as information has been censored there have been those who have fought against it (Newth, 2010). This issue has arisen particularly in the United States, as some believe access to any information that exists is a right protected by the Constitution.…
“In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…
The Internet is an amazing place where people can communicate, transfer and research information, and find entertainment sites. It also allows freedoms that major media enterprises did not have. The concern with the Internet is it contains sites that are not appropriate for children. Some people believe the Internet should be free from censorship while other argue the Internet should be controlled.…
The problem of Internet censorship, the act of limiting access to undesirable sites, continues to grow in today’s world. While justifying censorship in other countries because of nondemocratic governments, the United States Constitution grants the protection of an American’s freedom of speech, causing for the rise of many controversies and scandals.…
We have a right to believe in what we want and say what we want without the government limiting it, but if the government monitors the content we post online, the First Amendment rights we have would be very much at risk of being violated. The first time the Supreme Court heard a case dealing with First Amendment protections and how they apply to the Internet was Elonis v. United States. According to the article The Supreme Court case that could kill online free speech — or curb online harassment, the case revolved around a Pennsylvania man, Anthony Elonis, who posted several violent comments on Facebook in 2010 stating that he wanted to kill his ex-wife for leaving him and taking their children with her. He was convicted and sentenced to 44 months in prison on four counts of “making threats.†Now, Elonis is before the Supreme Court arguing that his threats should not have been taken seriously, as they were just made online, and did not constitute “true threatsâ€. This case really made people start to think whether government should have any power to determine what we can or can't say on the internet, because this can be an overstretch by the government on our First Amendment…
" The United States of America is a government established in the context of calls for independence from what was believed to be a tyranny of the British government. From this foundation, we have birthed core American values, freedom chief among them. This has manifested itself within the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights that states that as citizens of America we have the right to free speech. Flash forward to today, and this amendment has been argued over time and time again, for how much freedom is too much when the common good hangs in the balance? With the rise of new technologies and globalization, the Internet has become a primary form of communication, serving as a basis for a new kind of speech that can reach more people than…
People have suffered through not knowing the full extent of the digital age because some governments have prevented them from accessing the information super-highway known as the internet. The internet is censored because of corrupt and controlling governments and schools that think they are helping. Censorship itself is not inherently bad, but the venal tendencies of man are what cause censorship to become the main tool of dictators. The internet should be free, allowing all people of all races and creeds to access its free information. Censorship is an insidious tool that only leads to corruption and lack of creative expression.…
The Internet is a complex, living organism inhabited by people from all nations, ages, cultures, political and religious backgrounds. Despite international differences, languages and other barriers, the Internet has spread to every nook and cranny on the planet. Today the Internet is a forum for free discussion and a provider of information for all of those who wish to use it. Because of this freedom present in the web' minorities are afraid of this medium, and accuse it as being a villain, and wish to regulate it. Thus, the Internet is currently under fire because it is being blamed for the irresponsible people who use it for the wrong reasons. Web sites which contain pornographic material are the ones which we fear the most for our innocent children, however, censorship should never be used as the easy way out' as it has been so often used before by governments.…
With more and more frequency the newspapers are reporting instances of school children distributing disks of pornographic images which they have downloaded from the net and recently a university student was found to be operating such a site for material. On November 11, an Associated Press release (Phillips,1994) reported that Carnegie Mellon University had decided to block its users from accessing sexually explicit materials through the Internet: the university's president feared that the university could be prosecuted under state pornography laws if it did not control the access. Within the last week Towson State has prevented access to all of the alt.* groups on the Usenet which include alt.binaries.pictures.* which has sexually explicit pictures. Towson State has also included a warning on their home page that there may be pornographic material on the Internet. Pornographic material is not the only material to be found on the net which can raise questions of censorship and control: discussion of racial, political, religious and sexual topics all run the risk of offending someone, somewhere, leading to demands for control of the Internet. The question of censorship may also be raised in some unexpected places: one newsgroup is the rec.humor list, which is a collection of jokes submitted to subscribers. There are straightforwardly rude jokes but others are politically incorrect, focusing on sexual stereotypes, mothers-in-law, women and so on.…
We've been arguing for a while that attempts by various governments to shut down forms of communication during protests and riots only serves to make protesters and rioters angrier. Some new (quite timely) research, pointed out by Mathew Ingram, seems to agree that internet censorship tends to make such problems worse. The research is a quick read, and certainly goes further than efforts like L. Gordon Crovitz's "it's okay if the world didn't end."…
is anonymity on the Internet and so ages and identities are not known this makes…
The Internet Policy Institute (IPI) is the nation’s first independent, nonprofit research and educational institute created exclusively to provide objective, high-quality analysis and outreach on economic,…