Preview

Interpreting the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
946 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Interpreting the Constitution
| | |

Graded Assignment Answer Key

Interpreting the Constitution

Use the following question as a basis for writing a clear essay outline on the constitutional issues that divided the nation in the years leading up to the Civil War.

Use both our knowledge of the time period and the information on pages 2 and 3 this document to help you organize your outline. You may use the secondary and primary sources below to help you answer the question.

(50 points)

1. What were the major issues that drove the nation to Civil War in 1861? Follow the format in the example below to write your outline.

I. Topic Sentence: First issue

a. Support or proof b. Support of proof

Essay Outline

I.

A.

B.

II.

A.

B.

III.

A.

B.

IV.

A.

B.

V.

A.

B.

Source A: Events Leading to Disunion

• 1820 - Missouri Compromise: The legislation prohibited slavery in the newly acquired Louisiana Territory above the 36°30’N latitude line, admitted Missouri to the Union as a slave state, and Maine as a free state in order to maintain the balance of slave and free states in the Senate.

• 1846 - Wilmot Proviso: Although the Wilmot Proviso banning slavery in territories acquired from Mexico did not become law, it did reignite a bitter debate over slavery after nearly thirty years without debate on the issue in Congress.

• 1850 - Compromise of 1850: Stephen Douglas helped achieve a compromise in 1850 that admitted California as a free state, provided popular sovereignty for two territories, passed the Fugitive Slave Act, provided compensation to Texas, and abolished the slave trade in Washington, D.C. What it didn’t do was achieve a permanent solution to the issue of slavery for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Near the end of the Mexican-American War, the question of whether new territories won in the war would allow slavery or not became an issue. To address this issue, Pennsylvania Congressman David Wilmot proposed the”Wilmot Proviso” (Proviso = condition of terms of agreement), which called for the banning of slavery from any land purchased from Mexico. Northerners supported the proviso, southerners hated It., and after much debate, it was voted down, but reopened the debate about slavery and exposed serious sectional divisions in the…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 study guide

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. Wilmot Proviso- ban slavery in any territory to be acquired from Mexico in the Mexican War…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Wilmot Proviso-unsuccessful 1846 congressional amendment that sought to ban slavery in territories newly acquired from Mexico…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 eventually overturned the Missouri Compromise, when Texas applies for statehood after the Mexican-American War. Henry Clay, also known as “The Great Compromiser” allowed Texas to be declared a slave state, by writing this. To balance out the addition of a slave state to…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, a political action made during this period of time was the events of the Compromise of 1850. This question of westward expansion was thought at first to solve the question of slavery in territories. California was admitted as a free state and New Mexico and Utah were both organized as territories without slavery but the decision to decide if they chose to enter the states. These compromises were exhausted attempts for the free states to compromise slavery.…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over slavery arose again after the Mexican-American War, when Congress had to decide the status of new territory acquired from Mexico. Although the Constitution gave Congress no ability to rid the nation of slavery, it allowed for Congress to determine the qualification future state's admission. This made it possible for a majority of either section to manipulate a new state's status through making the abolition or the protection of slavery necessary for the state to become organized. An earlier compromise in 1820, was the result of a struggle for sectional control over the status of Missouri. Congress choose to appease both sides by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise created a westward line dividing the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The conflict between the North and South stemmed back to 1846, when the U.S.A won a huge area of Mexican territory as the result of what became known as the Mexican War. The land acquired revived controversy over the extension of slavery, as many Northerners wanted the new territory to become a free state with no slavery, and many Southerners wanted slavery to expand. Numerous compromises were conceded, to try to resolve the sectional conflict, for example the Wilmot Proviso of 1846 attempted to exclude slavery from any territory gained as a result of the war. The Calhoun Doctrine issued in 1847, and known as ‘The Platform of the South’, asserted that the territories were common property of all the states. However the argument of whether slavery should be allowed to expand, still continued and even threatened to tear the union apart, therefore a compromise of some sort seemed essential.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise affected the start of the Civil War for different reasons. The major reason was that it divided where slavery was legal or not at a line, known as the 36o30’ line, 36th parallel, or the Mason Dixon line. When Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine entered as a free state. The 36th parallel separated the North from the South, making the North all free states, and the South all slave states. The North and South basically became their own separate countries, but ruled by the same government. Many people wanted to break away from their slave state, and move to a free state, which caused the outbreak of the Civil War.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq; Slavery, Apush

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question: Some historians argue that slavery was the primary cause of the American Civil War. Utilizing the documents and your knowledge of the period 1846-1860, explain to what extent you believe this statement to be valid.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, not daring to upset the balance between the total number of states with either stance. This law also forbade the extension of slavery into any area north of the 36°30′ latitude line in the…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War-Causes.

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1782 Americans won their independence from Britain in the American Revolution. After the colonies won their independence, Americans created the Constitution. Its purpose was to replace the Articles of Confederation and solve its problems and more importantly to bring the states together under a single document creating a stronger union of all the states. There was one problem though: there were a few fundamental issues that the framers could not agree on. These issues included slavery and state vs. federal power. Since the framers could not agree they compromised, leaving these issues unresolved. The Union was formed with the Constitution, which was supposed to unite the states but instead embodied its major divisions. With conflicting ideas about the provisions in the Constitution related to the issues of slavery and the power of states' governments vs. the national government the union split into rivaling sections ultimately leading to the Civil War.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His 115 = Civil War

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * When the Mexican War ended, new territories were to be admitted as new states…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slave Compromise

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During 1820-1860, several reasons in the political views on slavery eventually led to the termination of compromise. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, generated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 in order to maintain the country as a whole. The Missouri Compromise declared Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, ended slave trade in Washington D.C. and a stronger Fugitive Slave Law passed. In 1833, Senator Henry Clay stated,”…it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state. Additionally, although Declaration of the National Anti-Slavery Convention in 1834 opposed slavery, they did believe Congress had “no right to interfere with any of the slave states…” .However, the northern disagreement against the Compromise of 1850, especially the Fugitive Slave Law, Wilmot Proviso and popular sovereignty, increased slavery’s opposition. This was emphasized in the Election of 1860, where not one Southern state voted for Lincoln; Lincoln won all of the “free” states except New Jersey. This major issue over slavery ultimately led to southern succession therefore deterioration of compromise. This is similar all of the times when individual states attempted to secede from the Union for various reasons, such as states’ rights. Western Expansion in Polk’s presidency due to Manifest Destiny created problems if new territories should be slave or free states. Like always, the North opposed slave states in new territories, and South favored it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays