After he came up dead and his story popped up in the newspaper many people gave their opinion on his decisions. One of the harshest of them said, “amounts of disrespect to the land… just another case of underprepared, over confident men bumbling around out there and screwing up because they lacked the requisite humility” (51). Most of these came from Alaskans who know how harsh the land could be but John Krakauer the author of the book Into The Wild believed otherwise. McCandless wasn’t crazy for what he did, he was just unfamiliar with the area but if he was crazy he wouldn’t have lasted in the wilderness as long as he did. (59)…
People were upset because they did not think McCandless’s life was worth all the fame and publicity and fame. They say McCandless had an easy life, he went to college got his degree and could be making a big salary. Some people including Krakauer and Penn are happy or satisfied with McCandless’s transcendentalist thinking and his nonconformity. Real transcendentalists know that McCandless was trying to get away from his route that he did everyday and to explore. Ever since Krakauer first heard the story of McCandless he has actually gone out and seen where he stayed on Fairbanks bus 142. Krakauer has so much respect for McCandless, to go out into the wilderness with a limited food supply takes courage and to have confidence, that most people do not have. During and before Mccandless trip he respected many transcendentalists such as Thoreau. So much respect that McCandless wrote his Declaration of Independence of transcendentalism. With McCandless gone and for only his story to carry on we must continue with being a nonconformist and to inspire one another. He definitely deserved his fame and to bring together a groups of strangers who never thought would meet. McCandless’s life was valuable and meant a lot to many people and he used it to inspire…
Into the wild is a book and a movie written by Jon Krakauer that is inspired by the actions of a college graduate named Chris McCandless. He lived a life on his own and was not the average person. Many people have different views and opinions about him and the way he chose to live his life. Shaun Callarman claims that he, “was bright and ignorant at the same time. He had no common sense, and he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness. He made a lot of mistakes based on ignorance. I don't admire him at all for his courage nor his noble ideas. Really i think he was plain crazy,” I strongly agree with Callarman’s statement because he did not consider the consequences of his actions before doing them.…
Chris McCandless, is he crazy or did he have justification? In the book Into the Wild, Chris McCandless deserted all his possessions and all of his money and set out on a journey to Alaska, that would eventually kill him. Some may believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild because of pure ignorance, but the main reasons are family problems and the desire to see and experience…
How many times has Hollywood taken a true story and turned it into something different? Hollywood took Chris McCandless’s story and turned it into an overdramatic work of art. Unlike Krakauer’s nonfiction best seller Into the Wild, the movie Into the Wild by Sean Penn overemphasizes ideas or fails to include crucial evidence which twists the viewers understanding of Chris McCandless’s life. The movie overemphasizes Chris’s parents’ relationship and the effect it has on him, creates a love interest for him in “Slab City”, and fails to mention Chris’s knowledge of the wild. Sean Penn’s film skews how people will remember Chris McCandless.…
The book “Into The Wild” tells the story of Chris McCandless and his journey and interactions with various people. Jon Krakauer the author wrote this book to show people what really happened so they could decide their own opinion of Chris McCandless and his story, instead of judging him on what the media said or critics or whoever. I personally think Chris was a nice smart person but didn’t make good decisions. One example of his bad decisions and the most prevalent one was is his decision to go live off the land with little or no supplies, Chris only brought the clothes on his back and other limited supplies such as cheap boots and a light coat. Another example is his refusal to accept help from people, had he actually took most of the things people offered him he would most likely survived and made it out in one piece living off the land. Those were just a few examples of his stubbornness and bad choices.…
What could be the purpose of Jon Krakauer writing the book “ Into The Wild”? The author, Krakauer who had a common interest with Chris McCandless, which was the love of the outdoors, the author may relate to Chris and reflect upon his life. Krakauer, who had traveled to Alaska in 1974, Alaska also happens to be the spot where McCandless went to in 1992. Krakauer sees his reflection upon McCandless because feels that he and McCandless are very alike they both have similar hobbies. Krakauer starts to see McCandless as himself a little,Krakauer wants to get McCandless’s story to the people because he feels like they are the same person because they are very identical and he wants the world to know what actually happened to him. Krakauer still wants to find the motive of why McCandless went into the wilderness . Krakauer till this day still loves talking about McCandless, he still does slideshows just to tell people his story. Krakauer argues to the fact that people call McCandless an idiot or a “bush” for leaving his home and trying to survive in the wild without proper materials that are needed. Krakauer's main purpose is to get McCandless’s story out to the people and he wants to motivate the young audience to always to do what their mind/heart wants them to do despite what the society thinks and to be happy they way they want to live their life the way…
Jon Krakauer wrote the book “Into the Wild”, and it is about a young man named Christopher McCandless who literally takes a journey into the wild. As the book started off it was clearly indicated that McCandless would be dead by the end of his journey. This tells us that whatever he was doing out there was probably not a smart thing to be doing. Christopher may come off as a sympathetic young man with a profound moral cause who is seeking a higher truth because of all the ideas that he has in his head about where he is headed. Jon Krakauer doesn’t believe that Chris was doing anything wrong but what Chris was doing was completely wrong. Krakauer does not make an effective case in trying to justify McCandless’ behavior because McCandless made a lot of unwise choices. To add on to that McCandless would not accept assistance from any of the people who were trying to help him out even though it was pretty obvious that he was about to head into the Alaskan wilderness clearly underprepared.…
To Chris McCandless and many others of his ilk like Henry Thoreau and Jack London,the wilderness of the west has a very specific allure. McCandless sees the wilderness as a purer state, a place free of the evils of modern society, where someone like him can find out what he is really made of, live by his own rules, and be completely free. Yet, it is also true that the reality of day-to-day living in the wilderness is not as romantic as he and others like him imagine it to be. Perhaps this explains why many of his heroes who wrote about the wilderness, for example, Jack London, never actually spent much time living in it.…
Yes, living alone in the wilderness like Thoreau and London sounds exciting, especially if you fake a big part of your adventures or if you can pack up and go home when you get too hungry. Chris McCandless doesn’t have these options, but Shaun Callarman believes that Chris is full of “Romantic silliness,” and by this statement I think he means that Chris goes into Alaska seeing only the good parts of the wilderness experience. Like Callarman, I believe that Chris has a head full of “Romantic ideas” and that he lacks “common sense” although I would not call him “plain crazy.”…
Before Grimm, before Supernatural, and even before Wicked, there was one “reimagining of classic fairy tales with interwoven plots and grey scale characters” and that was Into the Woods by Stephen Sondheim. Sondheim uses four familiar stories to set the scene for his overarching plot allowing him to concentrate on jokes and creating new relationships between old characters. He also uses familiar characters in ways that blend categories. Through much of act one every character is stock through and through, yet by the end of the play our dashing prince charming has become an unapologetic adulterer, and the wicked old witch becomes an anti-hero. In addition to plot and character Sondheim pays special attention to his musical numbers; just from the first number we understand the characters relationships to one another, their motivations (having children, going to the festival, visiting grandma, and not starving), and we’re introduced to the play’s key metaphor: the woods. While these aspects were vital to the performances success I will be concentrating on the diction and acting.…
* “I worry about when to plant and how to fertilize, and whether or not we’ll have enough water. I worry about low germination rates, and diseases and insects and accidents. But I haven’t wanted to be dead since the day I entered the garden” (Hegland 162).…
Being the black sheep of the family isn’t fun because it gives your whole family an exclusive free pass to point out your flaws, differences, and mistakes. June 22, 2015, a day I can never forget nor suppress no matter how hard I try. My family decided it would be nice to all get together at my grandma’s house for a family dinner since some time has passed since we really bonded. I wasn’t all that thrilled to go but had no choice but to go, when we got there everything I was told to go help cook. Being told to go help cook wasn’t the problem, the real problem was the reason for having to go help cook was because I’m a female meaning I’m ‘required’ to cook and clean for the male species. This annoyed me because we live in the time where all…
tyler is small. he always has been. from birth, to (though he doesn't know for sure) death. everything about him is small. his hands, his arms, his legs. but inside, there was something there, crawling out. clawing out. it screams, and tears at the cage it's entrapped in.…
Side by side, the horses flew across the field. At the far edge, nestled behind several towering pine trees, sat the quaint cottage, and just to the right, sunlight glinted off the calm surface of the spring. As Gawain and Wallace’s horse shot into the lead, Gawain gave the reins a gentle pull, slowing the animal.…