Theorem- information that seem true but must be proven (like solving a mystery) using the postulates.…
Intuition – Is the idea that principles of right and wrong have been built into a person’s conscience and the he or she will know what is right by listening to that “little voice “within.…
Intuition will have a huge influence on the decision making process of a person or an organization. Surely a person before making a decision on a purchase for example will consider his or her past experiences prior to making that decision. An organization is similar in that regard. An organization will take in to account what happened in their past concerning a process or product and the results of that prior to making any new decisions that may affect the success of the organization.…
Theorems: Statements that can be proven by using definitions, postulates and the rules of deduction and logic.…
Intuition is the effortless immediate automatic feeling or thoughts we often use instead of systematic reasoning. Overconfidence can lead us to overestimate the accuracy of our beliefs. Belief preference may cause you to cling to a belief. Framing is the way a question is worded or altered.…
“Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma- which is living the result of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart intuition,” this quote is Bill Gates’ words. This quote familiarizes itself with the book Sidekicked. Sidekicked is a book written by John David Anderson. It is about a boy named Andrew Macon ( a.k.a The Sensationalist). Andrew has to make severe decisions as a sidekick, and as a teenager. With super villains on the loose, and superheros on the low. Andrew has to step up his game as a superhero sidekick. Throughout the novel two themes stood out to me. Those themes are do only what you feel is best, and just because you are not a hero doesn’t mean you can’t save the day.…
According to Peter Singer, ordinary intuitions allude to the commonly held moral convictions about something and might be true or false. Common intuitions thus apply across the board and are accepted by a large group who support a belief if they belief is or reject one that they are against. An example of a common intuition as illustrated by Singer is the notion that killing worse compared to letting someone die naturally. On the other hand, rational intuitions according to Singer are the neutral, objective view of a situation rather than seeing it from the accidental incidents that evolved from the past. For instance, it is considered a rational intuition if the death of anyone is tragic (Singer 351). Rational intuitions here do not consider the moral aspect of a given tragic…
Amy, I agree I too believe intuition is definitely a part of the professional nurse’s decision-making process. I can recall stating many times “I just have this feeling” or “that patient just don’t look right”. If a nurse has been in this profession for a period of time, I bet they too have said the same thing. Calling some physicians can be taxing enough even when you have significant changes with supportive evidence. It is always nerving to call a physician with intuitive insight, however, I too have done the same. Some physicians respond with follow-up orders, while others are not as appreciative. However, as a nurse, we are the patient's advocate and it is our responsibility to notify the physician with concerns. We are with the patient…
The human mind is an obscure, complex object to understand and interpret. The brain itself is fascinating and mysterious, and it holds many valuable features hidden and not realized by the conscious human mind. Many unexplainable phenomena have been associated in life and in literature through the mind's workings. Psychologists develop reasons why people do certain things that they do, but with every human being's perception being so unique and varied, there is still much left to explore of the human mind. Human intuition is one facet of the mind that is very interesting, yet not very understood. The supersensory ideas that human intuition provides are of the soul, world, and God. No matter how grand their suggestiveness, no matter how genuine the evidence, those ideas have no empirical validity, and they belong entirely to the intellectual due to the fact that the understanding cannot "prove" itself existent or not. Human intuition is different between all people due to the fact that each person's mind matures at different levels of spirituality, understanding, and insight. Plus, it's very difficult for people to unravel and decipher the true, deep meaning of events and things in life, when really, the meaning of life isn't known. Yet, the human mind is so powerful that it even reveals things to itself about itself and about life. Be it human intuition or a phenomenon, such an experience is called an epiphany. An epiphany, as a feeling, is a sudden realization or comprehension of the essence or meaning of something (Wikipedia). An epiphany, in other words, is when someone has "found the last piece of the puzzle and now sees the whole picture." An epiphany is accomplished when new information or a new experience, normally insignificant by itself, illuminates a deeper or numinous foundational frame of reference (Wikipedia). Common cliché's, that people use to describe an epiphany, are "Eureka" and "I have found it!" (Wikipedia). These are definitely…
While deductive arguments are always certain, they are flawed in that they don’t obtain any new information. The conclusion is always contained implicitly in the premises. At best, deductive arguments merely uncover truths that were just unrecognised or obscured previously. Certainty comes at a cost.…
There are valuable insights to be gained from George Orwell’s famous book, ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’, and from director Steven Spielberg’s movie ‘Minority Report’. Though both these works point to the dangers of unbridled power in the hands of the State, there are also substantial differences in plot and vision of these works.…
point in history of mankind. What if the Wright brothers had no knowledge of flying…
Intuition, as I see it, is the ability to know something immediately without any apparent rational process. It is a process of thinking without actually thinking; it is a gut feeling. When I asked my friends about their opinion on intuition, all they say is “I know something, but I don’t know how I know it.” Generally based in emotions, due to its nature as a sense of knowing within one’s self, intuition doesn’t really fit nicely into any of the four traditional ways of knowing. It isn’t an emotion, nor is it based upon reasoning, language, or perception. It is a special way of knowing which cannot be distinctively explained, but occupies the place which other ways of knowing cannot. Intuition is simply a device on its own and despite it being used as a way to justify knowledge and being in close relation to awareness, intuition acts strongly on its own as a way of knowing and as such should be introduced as one. Intuition forms the fundamental base of most of the knowledge as well as natural human reflex.…
Cognitions are thoughts. Dissonance means clashing. The influential thoughts of cognitive dissonance states that contradicting or clashing thoughts cause discomfort. That is, we have a need for consistency in our thought, perceptions, and images of ourselves (Cooper, Mirablie, & Scher, 2005; Festinger, 1957). Inconsistency, then, can motivate people to make their thoughts or attitudes agree with their actions (Oskampe & Schultz, 2005). The theory of cognitive dissonance in social psychology proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by altering existing cognitions, adding new ones to create a consistent belief system, or alternatively by reducing the importance of any one of the dissonant elements. Cognitive dissonance is the distressing mental state that people feel when they "find themselves doing things that don 't fit with what they know, or having opinions that do not fit with other opinions they hold." A key assumption is that people want their expectations to meet reality, creating a sense of equilibrium.( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance) Likewise, another assumption is that a person will avoid situations or information sources that give rise to feelings of uneasiness, or dissonance. Cognitive dissonance theory explains human behavior by positing that people have a bias to seek consonance between their expectations and reality. According to Festinger, people engage in a process he termed "dissonance reduction," which can be achieved in one of three ways: lowering the importance of one of the discordant factors, adding consonant elements, or changing one of the dissonant factors. This bias sheds light on otherwise puzzling, irrational, and even destructive behavior. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance)…
Mathematics is not just a long list of random formulas that someone’s invented out of nowhere. Mathematics work because it is true, there is a reason for every step, every rule, and every part of every formula.…