Investments
initial position
Active management strategies can be broadly grouped into those applying: marketing timing, industry selection, security selection. Given the fact that that the investor already holds a well-diversified portfolio, it was decided that the most appropriate strategy was to purchase growth stocks which was considered to be undervalued by the market and can be bought cheaply today but has significant earnings upside to be able to outperform the market in capital terms in the future (Chahine (2009)). Chahine (2009) suggested that these stock may be identified using a combination of PE ratios and forecast earnings growth. The details of the initial position are shown in Appendix 1.
Price-Earnings Ratio
The Price-to-Earnings ratio is a measure of the share price of a company relative to its earnings. As such, a high PE ratio means that an investor is paying more for each unit of income compared to a company with a lower PE ratio. This valuation method has proven to be a useful analytical tool to identify desirable stocks as Campbell and Shiller (1989) showed that the ratio is a good predictor of future stock prices (See Graph 1). This conclusion is supported by Bhargava and Malhotra (2006) who showed that an increase in PE ratio brings about a decline in yields and inflated stock prices.
Graph 1: Source: Anderson and Brooks (2006)
An empirical study conducted by Basu (1977) concluded that portfolios formed with low PE ratio stocks outperformed portfolios formed by high PE stocks. This is confirmed by Graph 2 which shows that in the period from 1975 to 2003, low PE stocks have significantly higher Sharpe ratios than high PE stocks.
Graph 2: Source: Anderson and Brooks (2006)
Anderson and Brooks (2006) suggest that the main advantage of PE ratios is that they easily comparable with an unlimited number of stocks. However, it is limited by virtue of the fact that it is not stable over time and is partly determined by outside forces such the
Active management strategies can be broadly grouped into those applying: marketing timing, industry selection, security selection. Given the fact that that the investor already holds a well-diversified portfolio, it was decided that the most appropriate strategy was to purchase growth stocks which was considered to be undervalued by the market and can be bought cheaply today but has significant earnings upside to be able to outperform the market in capital terms in the future (Chahine (2009)). Chahine (2009) suggested that these stock may be identified using a combination of PE ratios and forecast earnings growth. The details of the initial position are shown in Appendix 1.
Price-Earnings Ratio
The Price-to-Earnings ratio is a measure of the share price of a company relative to its earnings. As such, a high PE ratio means that an investor is paying more for each unit of income compared to a company with a lower PE ratio. This valuation method has proven to be a useful analytical tool to identify desirable stocks as Campbell and Shiller (1989) showed that the ratio is a good predictor of future stock prices (See Graph 1). This conclusion is supported by Bhargava and Malhotra (2006) who showed that an increase in PE ratio brings about a decline in yields and inflated stock prices.
Graph 1: Source: Anderson and Brooks (2006)
An empirical study conducted by Basu (1977) concluded that portfolios formed with low PE ratio stocks outperformed portfolios formed by high PE stocks. This is confirmed by Graph 2 which shows that in the period from 1975 to 2003, low PE stocks have significantly higher Sharpe ratios than high PE stocks.
Graph 2: Source: Anderson and Brooks (2006)
Anderson and Brooks (2006) suggest that the main advantage of PE ratios is that they easily comparable with an unlimited number of stocks. However, it is limited by virtue of the fact that it is not stable over time and is partly determined by outside forces such the
References: * Aaker, David A., and Robert Jacobson, (1987), The Role of Risk in Explaining Differences in Profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 30(2), 277-296. * Bank Investment Consultant, (2006), Characterizing Risk, Bank Investment Consultant, 36-37 * Barnes, Leo, (1977), Long Lead vs * Bhargava, Vivek and D. K. Malhotra, (2006), Do Price-Earnings Ratios Drive Stock Values?, Journal Of Portfolio Management, 33(1), 86-92 * Bird, R * Blume, Marshall E., (1971), On The Assessment of Risk, The Journal of Finance, 23, 1-10 * Bollerslev, Tim., Engle, Robert F., and Jeffrey M * Brooks, Robert D., Faff, Robert W., Fry, Tim R. L., and E. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, (2005), Alternative Beta Risk Estimators in Cases of Extreme Thin Trading: Canadian Evidence, Applied Financial Economics, 15, 1251-1258 * Campbell, J * Condon, Kathleen A., (1981), Measuring Equity Transaction Costs, Financial Analysts Journal, 37(5), 57-61 * Damodaran, Aswath, (2008), Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications, Stern School of Business * Dimson, E., (1979), Risk Measurement When Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading, Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 197-226 * Dimson, E., and P * Dimson, E., Marsh, P. R., and M. Staunton, (2003), Global Evidence on the Equity Risk Premium, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15, 27–38 * Dince, Robert R., and Peter N * Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, (1992), The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465 * Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R * Fatas, Antonio and Ilian Mihov, (2009), Why Fiscal Stimulus is Likely to Work, International Finance, 12(1), 57-73 * Fowler, David J., Rorke, Harvey C., and Vijay M * Frino, Alex, Chen, Zhian, Hill, Amelia, Cometon-Forde, Carole and Simone Kelly, (2006), Introduction to Corporate Finance (Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW.). * Jensen, Michal C., (1968), The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964, Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416 * Jensen, Michael C, (1972), Capital Markets, Theory and Evidence, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3, 357-398 * Kaufhold, Kevin C., (2008), Time-Referenced Investment Policies, Journal of Financial Planning, April, 54-61. * Koski, Jennifer L., and Roni Michaely, (2000), Prices, Liquidity and the Information Content of Trades, The Review of Financial Studies, 13(3), 659-696 * Kumar, P * Litzenberger, Robert, Ramsay, Krishna and Howard Sosin, (1980), On the CAPM Approach to the Estimation of a Public Utility’s Cost of Capital, The Journal of Finance, 35(2), 369-383. * Mixon, Scott, (2001), Earnings Revisions and Portfolio Returns, Journal of Investing, 10(3), 33-35 * Modigliani, Franco and Leah Modigliani, (1997), Risk-Adjusted Performance, Journal of Portfolio Management, 23(2), 45-54 * Mossin, Jan, (1966), Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market, Econometrica, 34, 768-783 * Mullins, David E., (1982), Does the Capital Asset Pricing Model Work?, Harvard Business Review, 60, 105-114 * Murphy Jr., Joseph E., (1968), Earnings Growth and Price Change in the Same Time Period, Financial Analysts Journal, 24(1), 97-99 * Officer, R * Sharpe, William F., (1964), Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance, 19, 425-442 * Sharpe, William F., (1966), Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Business, 39 * Treynor, Jack L., (1966), How to Rate Management Investment Funds, Harvard Business Review, 43 * Tseng, Kuo C., (1998), Low Price, Price-Earnings ratios, Market Value and Abnormal Stock Returns, The Financial Review, 23(3), 333-343 * Zacks, Leonard, (1979), EPS Forecasts – Accuracy is Not Enough, Financial Analysts Journal, 35(2), 53-55