There is a lot of debate right now as to if the United States should go back to war with Iraq. Both sides of this debate, the people that are for going back to war and the people who are totally against it, have legitimate points” pro” and “con”. However, a lot of the people that are” Pro” engaging in war with Iraq again do not realize the underlining issues which exist. The United States just got out of a war with Iraq which brings up a lot of questions if we should go back or not. There are a few questions that most people do not sit down and truly think fully about.…
Bush and the global war on terror. Bush had to deal with an attack against American civilians, his quick action rallied the country to the cause and to the war on terror. “In October 2001, the United States attacked — not with conventional forces, but by deploying military advisors and supplies that bolstered anti-Taliban rebel forces. While Afghani allies carried the ground war, American planes rained destruction on the enemy.” (A. 965) Bush would later invade Iraq more or less for the oil production and to spread…
“The reason we invaded Iraq was for reasons far more than weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant who waged many wars in the Middle East, supported and aided numerous Aab invasions of Israel, threatened to invade Saudi Arabia, overran Kuwait, and caused the UN to bring about sanctions against Iraq. Saddam was also known to have an extensive chemical weapons arsenal and has used several chemical weapons against his own people while suppressing many human…
President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…
The president can use military power as he decides is essential and proper to shield national security and authorize all relevant United Nations Security chamber resolutions to use force. Before starting war, under obligations Bush had to make accessible to Congress his assurance of circumstances. Indeed, under requirements he had to prove that Iraq was infringing upon UN resolutions by yet being in control of weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that Iraq was behind the 9-11 assaults. Invading Iraq started before any peaceful resolutions, an alliance between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and a threat of weapons of mass destruction was proven. In his book, Record emphasizes how the 9/11 Commission reported in 2005 that while there may have been contacts between al Qaeda and the Baathist administration, have seen no proof that these ever formed into a community relationship; nor have we seen confirmation showing that Iraq participated with al Qaeda in creating or completing assaults against the United States” (51). Furthermore, Hussein allowed UN auditors to have access to suspected weapons areas. They reported that there was no proof or conceivable sign of an atomic weapons program in Iraq. Record concludes, Iraq was a choice not because it was a convincing security threat but…
President George W. Bush did something very important that has marked the United States hisorty. On March 19, 2003 he announced that war against Iraq had begun. In the primary document : Bush Declares War, the President gives a brief explaintion to the country into why he declared war with Iraq. He begain his justification for the war by explaining to all fellow citizens so everyone was aware. He started off by saying that the "country was in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq , to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger". In other words, not to cause harm but to actually defend us.…
The Islamic State is a terrorist group that should be stopped. They have hurt and continue to hurt a lot of people, but there isn’t much that the U.S. could do that has not been done yet. In my opinion, the fastest way to end with a problem is to get rid of it completely. One way to achieve that is by using nuclear weapons. Bombing Iraq to swipe the Islamic State could be an infinitive answer, but like everything there are some pros and cons to this method. To be more exact there are more negative effects to this method. First of all, Isis is not just in one place, but it’s spread all over the region. That means the U.S. would have to use many bombs. That would be extremely expensive and ineffective. Also, we would also be killing innocent…
After the 9/11/2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, the Bush Administration national security team actively debated an invasion of Iraq. The Iraq war started in 2003 and ended in 2011. In the decade since the 9/11, more than two million American military personnel had been deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan or both, as of Aug. 30, 2011. About five thousand troops did not return.…
Invading Iraq in 2003, signifying the start of the Iraq War, was not to avenge the attacks on 9/11. The Iraq War was also known as the War on Terrorism and allowed America to take a stance against terroristic groups such as Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein’s supposed connection with them as a strong government figure. At the start of the war, America strongly supported the invasion of Iraq. During the first couple years of war, the gap between the military…
After September 11, President Bush and his administration, associated the Iraqi regime with terrorism, and said Iraq had the capacity to produce Weapons of Mass Destruction, which could be used by terrorists to threaten the United States. Therefore, encouraging the U.S. citizens to support Bush and reelect him as President because he would take action by sending troops to Iraq, to find Saddam and other terrorists, while obtaining weapons that could potentially be used against the U.S. However, over time Bush and his administration began to lose support for their action taken in the war.…
America can help create an environment in Afghanistan for the establishment of a stable government, and it can help the Afghans rebuild important state institutions, including a national army and a police force. But only the Afghans themselves can build a nation.…
Six months ahead of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the United States had very little incisive evidence and relied greatly on analytic reviews and judgment in assessing what it knew about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction and their WMD Programs. This is according to declassified U.S. intelligence report.…
To insist that any civilized nation attempt to combat irrational, hostile nations or terrorist organizations by following international law is itself irrational. The UN and international law in general need to be able to adjust to face unique threats. Fighting an enemy that does not adhere to rules of warfare or international law while “playing by the rules” is a recipe for disaster. A simple example of this is the use of uniforms. The Geneva Conventions provided that lawful combatants must wear a distinguishable uniform. In Iraq and Afghanistan the enemy wore no uniforms while American soldiers are required to wear them. How does a soldier identify the enemy if he wears no uniform? There is little argument that our enemies in Iraq and Afghanistan were not following international law. The argument then turns to how we deal with nations and organizations like these.…
Bush’s war in Iraq has done untold damage to the United States. It has impaired our military power and undermined the morale of our armed forces. Our troops were trained to project overwhelming power. They were not trained for occupation duties.” I completely agree with George Sorors thoughts on the war between the United States and Iraq.…
Saddam Hussein was the leader of Iraq for over 30 years who made a “promising, oil-rich nation”(MacFarquhar) into a war-filled, police state. After growing up fatherless and in a poor village, he found violence to be a quick solution to his problems. In 2003 the United States invaded Iraq due to various threats and conflicts the two nations had run into. Was the United States justified in invading Iraq? Some might say that Iraq should deal with their own problems and not have another nation come to shut them down. Iraq’s problems were not kept within Iraqi borders, which is why they had become so great. The United States had many justified reasons to invade Iraq. Hussein was killing many people, including his own, he invaded various countries…