Preview

Is Gay Marriage Ruining the "Sanctity" of the Institution?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Gay Marriage Ruining the "Sanctity" of the Institution?
Is Gay Marriage Ruining the "Sanctity" of the Institution?

Marriage is traditionally viewed as the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife. However, what happens when those two people are two men or two women? This topic of gay marriage has been a major issue in the United States over the past few years. It has raised several political debates as well as other minor arguments throughout the United States and around the world. Until recently, homosexual couples in the United States were allowed to marry. Recently, a series of events change the standing of homosexual marriages in the United States. The Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas repealed a Texas law that made sodomy a crime in order to affirm the privacy rights of homosexuals. In November 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the state cannot deny marriage licenses to homosexual couples. Following the Massachusetts decision, more gay marriages occurred publicly across the nation from San Francisco to New York. President George W. Bush responded to these activities by urging Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages. On May 17, 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to grant legalized same-sex marriages. Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that marriage is a union between a man and a woman and they view anything else as morally wrong. They claim that homosexual marriage is unconstitutional and would destroy the sanctity of marriage. I believe that gays and lesbians should have the right to marry legally; it would allow them to have several legal benefits, such as medical coverage and pension rights. These same marital rights are given to heterosexual couples, so why would homosexual couples be deprived? I believe that the government should not interfere in personal matters such as marriage. In the United States alone there are over eighty-four major religions that are practiced. Why is it that many of the laws that this country enforce is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    You can't deny somebody the right to get married without touching discrimination. " On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Sarah Zabel ruled Florida's gay marriage ban unconstitutional and stated that the ban serves only to hurt, to discriminate, to deprive same-sex couples and their families of equal dignity, to label and treat them as second-class citizens, and to deem them unworthy of participation in one of the fundamental institutions of our society."(ProCon.org) Opposing gay marriage is just flat out wrong, you can't just treat some citizen of the country one way and favor the others, that is 100% discrimination, and unconstitutional. Some people might argue and say that it's strictly a religious matter, however, that's not true, marriage is also a secular matter. Secondly telling gay people they can't get married isn't a religious freedom its abuse. Because if you were to base your argument off of the fact that gay people can't get married because of your religion, that's flat our crazy, one because not everyone in this country, or the world is of the same religion, and secondly, I can just go an make a religion were gay people are allowed to get married, and that ok because that what we believe in. Other people maybe argue that it says in the bible that gays getting married is an abomination, however, this country was founded on the fact that there is separation of church and state, which make that argument invalid as…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting with the last prompt of the assignment, according to our textbook, “Win-win orientations assume that there are usually ways to resolve differences so that everyone gains…When all people are committed to finding a mutually acceptable solution, a win-win resolution is possible” (Wood, 2009, p. 230). Unfortunately, here is the precise problem with the religious zealots who call themselves Christians. They are forever stuck in a win-lose orientation. What becomes ludicrous is they believe somehow, the human right to share love with an individual of the same sex in a committed relationship with all of the legal benefits will cause strife for them. None of the gay population is telling them to marry same-sex individual yet they insist, if gays want to marry and raise a family, it must be with someone of the opposite sex. Heterosexuals are doing such an exemplary job of getting marriage right that is common knowledge the divorce rate hovers around fifty percent. The point here is the INSTITUION OF MARRIAGE has been in the toilet for quite some time now and the only thing extending the legal right to gay couples will do is boost the economy with fabulously lavish weddings and then the inevitable lining of divorce lawyers’ pockets.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same-sex marriage has been an on-going battle for many years. California’s opposition to same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, barely passed in the 2008 election. Same-sex marriage has been a news-worthy topic since 1997 when Hawaii passed a Domestic Partnership policy which triggered other states to change policies as well. This issue started a state-to-state debate of whether same-sex couples should have the same rights that heterosexual, married couples have. This debate between states has reached a Congressional level. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases surrounding this on-going debate. The cases the Court will hear are related to allowable benefits for same-sex partners, and California’s ban on gay marriage.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hodges that state limitations on same-sex marriage violates the Fourteenth Amendment, making all state bans on same-sex marriages illegal. This Supreme Court decision took the decision of gay rights legislation, when it comes to marriage, out of the hands of the states, making it a federal issue. This ruling made it legal for same-sex couples to marry in all 50 states. The problem with the rulings, though, was that it did not provide instructions on implementation within the individual states (Duke, 2015). This paper will focus on legislation on the Federal level and will cover issues and rights that the LGBT community has been fighting for. As you will read later in the paper, marriage is not the only rights that the LGBT community lacked, there were many policies that passed through the United States government to get the country where it is today in terms of…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those are marriages are strictly between a man and a woman and marriage is a privilege, not a right. In bible it is often quotes that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. So in the case of Baker v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within an family is as old as the book of Genesis” (Gay Marriage - ProCon.org). So two couple of the same sex getting married is contradictory to that belief. Many Christian believers believe that it is morally wrong to allow same-sex marriage. These can be attributed to religious texts. Oppose group of marriage equality believe that marriage is a privilege and not a right. The classes that are protect under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 include “(1) a history of longstanding, widespread discrimination, (2) economic disadvantage, and (3) immutable characteristics… ‘Sexual Orientation’ does not meet any of the three objective criteria shared by the historically protected civil rights categories” (Gay Mariage – ProCon.org). Same-sex marriage contradicts nature. Two people of the same sex will never be able to marry because it is biologically…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America, through its core democratic values, is greatly divided on civil rights issues because of the weight of consideration given to all who can voice their opinions. This gives rise to many topics of strong debate, delaying progressive action due to liberties granted by the Bill of Rights, and implications of impeding civil rights discrepancies. Currently there is a major debate in the white house, concerning the legal rights of gay people, mainly their right to have a marital status recognized by all levels of government. In 1996, there was an act, Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA), that was approved that made clear what the definition was of the words “marriage” and “spouse”. This definition was: “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same sex marriage is currently not an option in 39 states. It has been frowned upon by the church for decades, yet the 14th amendment makes “the elusive promise of equality a reality”. (p.255) In 1996 congress passed DOMA to define the word marriage as a “legal union between one man and one woman” (p.253) This preventing any couples married in one state that allows gay marriage to move to a state without, and receive recognition of their union.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People always against same-sex marriage but then they do not hate gays they just disagree that same sex marriage relate with religious. People think that marriage was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As the book of Genesis mentioned “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; make and female He created them. God blessed them, saying ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen 1:28-29). However, government and religious beliefs should be separated, government should not put religious beliefs into consideration, it is extremely unfair. Government has to clear and classify that government is the one who make the law not religious or God. It is important that we know that same-sex marriage has their freedom to choose the religious beliefs or not, so government is the one who control it but not religion so it should clearly…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adocates throughout the world came together with one voice to fight for marital rights for same sex couples. According to an article in the Huffington Post, Liebelson and Terkel, reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that it is legal for all Americans, no matter their gender or sexual orienation, to marry the people they love. The decision is a historic victory of gay rights activitsts who have fought for years in the lower courts. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia already recognize marriage equality. The remaining 13 states ban these unions, even as public support have reached record levels nationwide. The justices found that, under the 4th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth BaderGinsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonai Sotomayor. In a rare move, the four dissenting justices each wrote an opinion (Dana Liebelson and Amanda Terkel,…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of November 7, 2012, gay marriage has been legalized in nine U.S. states (Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Washington) including the District of Columbia. However, thirty-one states have constitutional amendments banning gay marriage and six states have laws banning gay marriage. There are many arguments surrounding this controversy that express extremely different opinions regarding supposed outcomes and benefits that would come along with legalizing gay marriage.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same-sex marriage is one of the most controversial issues here in Texas; with that being said views can fluctuate over time. Aaron Blake of The Washington Post writes a very interesting article explaining a recent case in which a court judge strikes down Texas’ ban on gay marriage. U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia ruled that current laws restricting same-sex marriage violated the United States Constitution and took away their rights “without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose.” The ruling did not take immediate effect and is still working its way through the appeal process. In 2005 Texans amended the state constitution to define marriage exclusively as a union between a man and a woman…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since many people accociate marriage with the church, then to them, this aforementioned versus would make the marriage of homosexuals a sin, and therefore be wrong. But then on the other hand, you have millions of pople in the nation who are not Christians, so the idea of sin isn't something they would believe in. Why should a law be created that affect everyone, based on a religious view held by only portion of the population?…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many people today the topic of gay marriage creates ethical controversy. When dealing with matters concerning ethics people often have passionate feelings. Simply put, ethics are the concern of what is morally right or wrong. According to the author of the textbook, The Philosophical Journey, “in ethics, we are concerned with what we ought to do, what consequences ought to be achieved, and what sort of persons we ought to become.” (Lawhead 418) It is an issue that sparks protests and public demonstrations in favor of and against. Same sex relationships in Colorado have always been considered to be taboo. Many oppose gay marriage and the rights of homosexuals as evidenced by the state laws pertaining to gay marriage.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Only sixteen states have legalized gay marriage; moreover, there are still thirty-four states left. The real question is what is keeping people from voting for same-marriage? There are a variety of reasons opponents argue same-sex marriage should be illegal. Their main argument involves the traditional definition of marriage. For generations the definition of marriage has been “a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children with a family” (ProCon.org, 2013). This is supported by religious texts such as the Bible, but there are many arguments as to why the above definition in invalid. To begin, it is also stated in the Bible that women are property of men. It is the twenty-first century and there are equal rights for women, many women participate in the workforce and it is no longer acceptable to suggest that a woman’s place is at home. Supporters are in agreement with Sylvia Law when she stated, “any effort by the state to hardwire sex differences into the concept of marriage perpetuates traditional sex-based stereotypes of man-as-breadwinner and woman-as-housekeeper” (Eskridge, 1993). Everyday an increasing number of Americans become more open-minded and accepting of others, so why can people not be accepting of homosexuals. If people of religion can disregard one statement, why can they not disregard another? Ted Olsen, former US…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Same sex marriage has been a debatable issue in the United States for many decades now, but just in 1993, Baehr v. Miike, a legal case of three same-sex couples decided by The Supreme Court of Hawaii, alarmed the nation when ruled that a ban on same sex marriage constituted discrimination based on sex. During that time, no one state allowed same-sex marriage but all of them recognized marriages from each other. Thus, if back then with Baehr v. Miike case, Hawaii had recognized same sex marriage, other states would have had recognized it too. It was then, as an immediate response to the Hawaiian case, the creation of The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), an Act that was passed by the federal government in 1996…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics